Editors: Siegel, Marilyn J.
Title: Pediatric Body CT, 2nd Edition
> Table of Contents > Chapter 13 - Thoracoabdominal Trauma
Chapter 13
Thoracoabdominal Trauma
Injuries are the leading cause of death in children after the age of 1 year. Most deaths and injuries are caused by blunt trauma, usually associated with motor vehicle accidents. Other causes of blunt trauma include bicycle, skateboard, all-terrain vehicle, or motorcycle accidents; falls; and assaults (1,2,3). The remaining trauma-related deaths and injuries are due to gunshot or stabbing incidents, burns, drowning, and child abuse.
Multisystem injury is characteristic of blunt trauma, and the most common sites of injuries are the musculoskeletal system, head and neck, and then the abdomen and thorax. The extensive use of CT has improved the care of trauma patients. This in part reflects not only the ability of CT to detect injury, but also its ability to exclude significant trauma, thereby leading to more conservative management (4,5,6,7,8). This chapter reviews the approach to performing CT in children following blunt thoracoabdominal trauma, the patterns of injury, and the impact on patient management.
General Considerations
Clinical Assessment
The initial step in the management of children with major or multisystem injuries is the identification of potentially life-threatening injuries, which include (a) acute respiratory failure from airway obstruction, tension pneumothorax, or hemothorax; (b) massive hemorrhage, causing hypovolemic shock; and (c) severe intracranial injuries (1,9,10).
Patients who are hemodynamically unstable often require emergency surgical intervention. CT is usually reserved for hemodynamically stable patients who are at higher risk of a thoracic or abdominal injury. Clinical and laboratory variables associated with a significantly higher risk of injury include substantial respiratory distress, hypoxemia, abdominal tenderness or distention, lap-belt ecchymosis, gross hematuria, dropping or low hematocrit levels, elevated liver transaminase levels, and a trauma score (Glasgow Coma Score) <12 (7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14). Neurologic impairment without signs referable to the chest or abdomen is a low-yield indication for thoracoabdominal CT (15).
Blunt Thoracic Trauma
Pulmonary contusion or laceration, pneumothorax, hemothorax, and rib and clavicle fractures are the common chest injuries in children. Hemopericardium or pneumopericardium, great vessel trauma, diaphragmatic rupture, airway or esophageal disruption, and sternal injuries are less frequent injuries. Chest radiography remains the imaging study of choice to screen children with blunt thoracic trauma. Thoracic CT can be useful in hemodynamically stable patients with equivocal radiographs to confirm suspected injuries and to diagnose unsuspected injuries. CT may also be used to more precisely delineate the full extent of a radiographically apparent injury.
CT Technique
The CT technique is similar to that for a conventional examination of the mediastinum and lungs. Posttraumatic thoracic CT examinations are performed following a bolus administration of intravenous contrast material, which is administered with a power injector whenever possible. The contrast volume varies with patient weight. Scanning is initiated after a delay of 25 to 30 seconds. The milliamperage and kilovoltage need to be the lowest possible that maintain image quality (16,17). Typical collimation and pitch are 0.75 to 1.5 mm and 1 to 1.5, respectively, for a 16-row detector, and 0.6 to 1.25 mm and 1 to 1.5, respectively, for a 64-row detector. Images are reviewed with 3- to 5-mm section thickness at lung, soft tissue, and bone windows. Images are reconstructed at 1 to 2 mm if multiplanar and 3D reconstructions are indicated. (See Chapter 1 for more detailed discussion of techniques). Artifacts can be minimized by positioning the patient's arms above the head and by removing overlying
P.430

tubes and other opaque objects from the scanning field whenever possible.
Figure 13.1. Subcutaneous emphysema following blunt chest trauma. CT image through the upper chest shows air in the subcutaneous tissues and in the muscle planes of the chest wall. Also note bilateral pneumothoraces (P) and small pneumomediastinum (arrow).
Specific Injuries
Chest Wall
Chest wall injuries include contusion, hematoma, subcutaneous emphysema (Fig. 13.1), and fractures (Fig. 13.2). Chest wall contusion produces soft tissue–attenuation reticular densities within the usually homogeneous subcutaneous fat, whereas hematoma usually produces a soft tissue–attenuation mass. Both processes can obliterate fat planes between muscles. Subcutaneous emphysema is seen as bands of air within the subcutaneous fat and/or between the muscle groups of the chest wall (Fig. 13.1). Subcutaneous air may be a sequela of skin lacerations, open soft tissue wounds, or an underlying pneumothorax or pneumomediastinum.
Figure 13.2. Fractures. A: Rib fracture. CT image with bone window setting demonstrates segmental (double) fractures (arrows) of a right rib associated with right pleural effusion, lung contusion, and subcutaneous emphysema posteriorly. This patient had multiple segmental fractures, consistent with flail chest. B: Scapular fracture. CT at a more superior level shows a scapular fracture (arrow). The right apical density represents hemothorax.
Rib fractures occur in 15% to 35% of children with blunt thoracic trauma (2,18,19) (Fig. 13.2A). The frequency is lower in children than in adults, presumably because the chest wall is more pliable and resilient in the pediatric population. Rib fractures alone are usually of little clinical significance and are not a reliable predictor of the severity of injury. However, their location and number can indicate the presence of underlying injuries (20,21,22,23). Fractures of the first three ribs, especially when accompanied by mediastinal hematoma or extrapleural hematomas over the lung apices, should elicit concern about brachial plexus and vascular injuries. Fractures of the tenth through twelfth ribs should increase concern about hepatic, splenic, and renal injuries (21).
Flail chest is a more serious finding of rib fracture and is defined as segmental or double fractures of three or more contiguous ribs or single fractures of five or more adjacent ribs. Paradoxical respiratory motion associated with the flail segment can lead to impaired chest wall mechanics, atelectasis, and respiratory failure. Other injuries of the thorax that can be identified by CT include thoracic spine, sternal, scapular (Fig. 13.2B) and clavicular fractures, and sternoclavicular joint dislocations.
Pleural Space
Pneumothorax
Pneumothorax occurs in 24% to 35% of children with blunt thoracic injuries (Figs. 13.1 and 13.3) (2,22,24).
P.431

Mechanisms of injury include direct puncture of the visceral pleura by fragments of a fractured rib; primary lung injury, such as pulmonary laceration; and tracheobronchial or esophageal tears. In patients who are hemodynamically stable and not ventilated, small pneumothoraces recognized only by CT are usually not clinically significant. These patients can be followed by serial chest radiographs. Recognition of small pneumothoraces is important in patients who need mechanical ventilation or general anesthesia for surgery. Both of these procedures may produce enlargement of the pneumothorax with resultant respiratory or cardiovascular compromise (25,26).
Figure 13.3. Occult pneumothorax. Axial CT scan demonstrates a small left pneumothorax (arrows) that was not identified on a supine chest radiograph. Note also ill-defined areas of ground-glass density and consolidation bilaterally, representing parenchymal contusions.
CT also can be helpful in characterizing confusing air collections observed on chest radiography, such as distinguishing a medial pneumothorax from a pneumomediastinum (Fig. 13.4) or air within the pulmonary ligament. Following chest tube placement for treatment of pneumothorax, CT may be of value in ascertaining the exact site of the thoracostomy tube and in guiding tube repositioning when the tube is in an extrapleural location. Thoracostomy tubes located within a pleural fissure may still function as effectively as those lying elsewhere in the pleural space and do not necessarily need to be repositioned or replaced (27).
Hemothorax/Pleural Effusion
Hemothorax, defined as a collection of blood within the pleural space, occurs in 35% to 70% of children with blunt thoracic trauma (2,22,24). It may be the result of injury to the chest wall, diaphragm, mediastinum, or lung. When there is venous bleeding, such as that associated with a lung contusion, the hemothorax is usually small, low pressure, and self-limited. Laceration of higher-pressure systemic arteries (i.e., intercostal, internal mammary, aorta, or other great vessels) is more likely to produce a large, rapidly expanding hemothorax. Acute hemothorax has high attenuation (70 to 80 HU) (Fig. 13.5) (21).
Figure 13.4. Pneumomediastinum. Axial CT scan with lung windows shows air (arrows) anterior to the thymus (T) and in the right paramediastinal area. Note also atelectasis of both upper lobes posteriorly and soft tissue emphysema.
Posttraumatic pleural effusions usually represent hemothorax, but on occasion, they contain only transudate or chyle or an admixture of both fluids. Transudative effusions
P.432

can occur after resuscitation and overhydration of the patient. Chylous pleural fluid usually follows a crush or penetrating injury to the thorax or neck, which damages the thoracic duct. Attenuation values of serous and chylous effusions are approximately 10 to 20 HU. Air within a posttraumatic pleural fluid collection may result from pneumothorax or tracheobronchial fistula or it may be secondary to percutaneous aspiration.
Figure 13.5. Hemothorax. CT scans shows a high-attenuation (55 HU) left pleural effusion (E), representing hemothorax. Also note subcutaneous air (arrow) and left lower lobe atelectasis (A).
Figure 13.6. Pulmonary contusion. A: CT image through the lung bases demonstrates a nonsegmental area of consolidation in the right lower lobe. B: CT in another child shows bilateral ground-glass opacity.
In patients who undergo pleural drainage, CT may be of value to assess the adequacy of the drainage and the position of the thoracostomy tube (28). Malpositioned chest tubes can be easily recognized at CT. CT can also be used to differentiate pleural fluid from parenchymal complications, such as atelectasis or contusion.
Lung Parenchyma
Pulmonary Contusion
Pulmonary contusion is the extravasation of blood into the interstitium and airspaces without laceration and is the most common pulmonary injury, occurring in approximately 50% to 65% of children with blunt thoracic trauma (2,22,24). Most contusions occur near the site of blunt impact, close to ribs or the spine, but they may be found in areas remote from the injured site because of a contrecoup effect. Usually they are localized and produce mild symptoms, but they can be widespread and lead to acute respiratory distress syndrome (21). Typically, they have both rapid onset and resolution, appearing within 4 to 6 hours after injury and clearing within 3 to 8 days (20).
At CT, contusion appears as an ill-defined area of ground-glass density or consolidation, typically in a peripheral location (Fig. 13.6). The CT appearance is nonspecific and can mimic edema, pneumonia, and aspiration. The presence of associated rib fracture or chest wall hematoma favors contusion over other causes of lung opacity.
Pulmonary Laceration
Pulmonary laceration, which is a tear of the lung parenchyma resulting in formation of a cavity that may be filled with air or air and blood, occurs in approximately 15% of children with blunt thoracic injuries (2). The mechanisms of injury include (a) sudden compression against a closed glottis, (b) compression of the lung over the vertebral body from rapid compression of the chest wall, and (c) a penetrating injury by a fractured rib fragment (29).
The typical CT appearance of pulmonary laceration is a round, well-circumscribed, parenchymal opacity or cavity containing air or air and fluid (Fig. 13.7). Pulmonary lacerations usually resolve completely over several weeks to months (20,29). Air-filled lacerations (also termed pneumatoceles) resolve more quickly than blood-filled lacerations (hematomas).
Aorta
The incidence of aortic laceration in children sustaining blunt thoracic trauma ranges between <1% and 7% (2,30,31). The postulated mechanisms of injury include (a) a shearing stress on the aorta produced by differential deceleration of the aortic root, aortic arch, and descending aorta at the time of blunt trauma and (b) compression of the aorta between the sternum and the thoracic spine (the osseous pinch) (32,33,34,35). Regardless of the mechanism of injury, the result is a tear in one or more layers of the aortic wall. Most tears are complete (i.e., transmural).
P.433

Figure 13.7. Pulmonary laceration. CT image through the lower chest demonstrates a right lower lobe parenchymal cavity containing an air–fluid level (arrow).
Over 90% of aortic tears involve the aortic isthmus (i.e., proximal descending aorta at the insertion of the ligamentum arteriosum just beyond the origin of the left subclavian artery) (30,35). The remaining tears involve the ascending or descending aorta. Clinical findings associated with aortic tear include retrosternal or interscapular pain owing to mediastinal dissection of blood, dyspnea, upper extremity hypertension, lower extremity hypotension, and a harsh systolic murmur over the precordium or transscapular area. Aortic injury is often associated with other thoracic injuries, including lung, cardiac, and diaphragm injuries (35).
Figure 13.8. Aortic lacerations. A: Axial CT demonstrates high attenuation periaortic and mediastinal hemorrhage and a saccular pseudoaneurysm (arrow) arising from the proximal descending aorta. B: Aortic laceration. Axial CT demonstrates periaortic mediastinal hematoma (H), and linear lucency within the enhanced aortic lumen, representing an intimal flap (arrow) in this 16-year-old boy involved in a motor vehicle accident.
Chest radiography is the initial screening examination in the assessment of suspected aortic injury. Patients who have obvious clinical or radiographic evidence of mediastinal injury require emergency aortography or surgical intervention (32). CT is generally reserved for hemodynamically stable patients who are at high risk for aortic tear based on abnormal chest radiographs or appropriate mechanisms of injury (32,36,37). In such patients, CT can determine the presence of aortic injury or diagnose other causes of apparent mediastinal widening seen on chest radiography. Alternative explanations for mediastinal widening include hemorrhage owing to injuries of the brachiocephalic vessels, hematoma secondary to vertebral body fracture, paravertebral pleural effusion, atelectatic/contused lung, and congenital vascular anomalies, such as double or right aortic arch (32,38,39).
Direct CT findings of aortic injury are false or pseudoaneurysm (Fig. 13.8A), intimal flap (Fig. 13.8B), focal aortic contour deformity, and active contrast extravasation (31,40,41,42,43). The false aneurysm appears as a saccular outpouching or an area of focal aortic widening. An intimal flap is seen as a linear, low-attenuation area within the opacified aortic lumen. Mediastinal hematoma is an indirect finding of mediastinal trauma and is not specific for aortic injury. Most often, mediastinal hemorrhage is secondary to tears of small mediastinal arteries and/or veins rather than from aortic tear (21). Mediastinal hemorrhage may be diffuse or focal and appears as a fluid collection within the mediastinum. The sensitivity of CT for the diagnosis of aortic injury is >95% (36,43). Causes of false-negative studies are technically suboptimal examinations degraded by motion artifact or
P.434

insufficient contrast material administration and contained intimal and/or medial tears unassociated with mediastinal hematoma.
Partial aortic transection may not be recognized at the time of the blunt trauma. The tear may expand over time and be incidentally detected on plain chest radiography or because of symptoms related to expansion (21). A chronic traumatic pseudoaneurysm appears on CT as saccular or fusiform dilatation of the aortic lumen. Calcification may be noted in the wall of the pseudoaneurysm.
Heart/Pericardium
Cardiac injuries, usually contusions, occur in approximately 5% of cases of blunt trauma (2). Acute hemopericardium is the characteristic finding of injury to the heart or pericardium. On CT, pericardial hemorrhage appears as a high-attenuation fluid collection in the pericardial sac (44,45) (Fig. 13.9). Large amounts of blood can compress the heart and lead to cardiac tamponade. CT findings of distended central veins (e.g., vena cava, hepatic and/or renal veins) and periportal lymphedema, in combination with hemorrhagic pericardial fluid, suggests acute tamponade.
Pneumopericardium results when air from ruptured alveoli dissects along perivascular and/or peribronchial sheaths and enters the pericardial space (Fig. 13.10). Small amounts of pericardial air are usually of little clinical significance and may be an incidental finding on CT. Larger amounts of air can cause tension pneumopericardium and hemodynamic compromise.
Figure 13.9. Acute traumatic hemopericardium. CT image demonstrates high-attenuation blood in the pericardial sac (white arrows) in a patient who sustained a stab injury to the left chest. Note also a hemorrhagic pleural effusion (E), pneumothorax (black arrow), and left lower lobe atelectasis (A). (Same patient as in Fig. 13.5.)
Figure 13.10. Pneumopericardium. A small amount of air (arrow) is present in the pericardial sac in this patient with a history of motor vehicle accident.
Trachea and Bronchi
Tracheobronchial injuries occur in <5% of children sustaining blunt chest trauma (2,46). Mechanisms of injury include (a) compression of the tracheobronchial tree between the sternum and vertebral columns, (b) a shearing injury, and (c) an acute increase in tracheobronchial pressure following a crush injury to the chest against a closed glottis (46). Approximately 80% of tracheobronchial injuries occur within 2.5 cm of the carina; 80% involve main-stem bronchi, 15% involve the trachea, and 5% involve distal bronchi (46,47).
CT findings of tracheal and/or bronchial rupture include a focal defect in the tracheal or bronchial wall, deformity of the central airway, an extraluminal location of the endotracheal tube or the balloon cuff, persistent pneumothorax or air leak following thoracostomy tube placement, massive mediastinal and subcutaneous emphysema, abrupt tapering of the injured bronchus, and mediastinal shift toward the collapsed lung (Fig. 13.11) (48). When there is a complete bronchial tear, the transected lung falls away from the hilum toward the posterolateral chest wall or hemidiaphragm, the so-called fallen lung sign. By comparison, in the usual pneumothorax
P.435

with an intact bronchus, the lung remains attached to the hilum and collapses toward it.
Figure 13.11. Bronchial rupture. CT scan just below the tracheal bifurcation shows a defect in the posterior wall of the right stem bronchus (arrow), a large pneumomediastinum, and subcutaneous air.
Esophagus
Esophageal injury from blunt chest trauma is rare, occurring in <1% of children. The mechanism of injury is usually a severe compressive blow to the chest and/or abdomen. Other causes of esophageal trauma include foreign body ingestion (Fig. 13.12), inadvertent esophageal intubation, traumatic nasogastric tube placement, endoscopy, and esophageal dilation procedures. CT signs of perforation include extraluminal air, periesophageal fluid, esophageal thickening, pleural effusion, and oral contrast material within the mediastinum or pleural space (49).
Diaphragm
Diaphragmatic rupture occurs in approximately 2% of children with blunt thoracic injury (2). The mechanisms of injury are thought to be a direct frontal impact causing an increase in intra-abdominal pressure or a direct lateral impact, which distorts the chest wall and shears the diaphragm. Left-sided ruptures are more common than right-sided ruptures, believed to reflect the protective effect of the liver on the right hemidiaphragm. Most ruptures involve the posterior and posterolateral portions of the diaphragm (50,51,52). Diaphragmatic rupture rarely occurs in isolation and is more commonly associated with intra-abdominal and/or intrathoracic injuries.
CT findings of diaphragmatic rupture include discontinuity or a gap in the hemidiaphragm (absent diaphragm sign), intrathoracic herniation of abdominal organs or fat (Fig. 13.13), a waistlike constriction of stomach or bowel at the site of herniation, and thickening of the diaphragm as a result of edema or hematoma (50,51,52,53,54,55). The stomach, spleen, kidney, small and large bowel, and omentum can herniate into the thorax with tears of the left hemidiaphragm. The liver and occasionally the colon herniate with lacerations of the right hemidiaphragm. The use of reformatted sagittal or coronal images may improve the diagnosis of diaphragmatic rupture, especially detection of small defects (56,57).
Figure 13.12. Esophageal perforation. CT image at the level of the aortic arch demonstrates air (white arrows) and extravasated high-attenuation oral contrast material (black arrow) in the mediastinal soft tissues adjacent to the esophagus (open arrow), related to esophageal perforation. T, trachea.
Figure 13.13. Diaphragmatic rupture. CT image through the lower chest demonstrates the air- and fluid-filled stomach (ST) lying within the left thoracic cavity.
P.436

Abdominal Trauma
CT has virtually replaced all other imaging studies in the evaluation of blunt and penetrating abdominal trauma because of its noninvasive nature and excellent sensitivity. It permits rapid identification of patients needing surgical treatment and allows for more confident nonoperative management of children with relatively minor injuries (58,59).
Subsequent to the introduction of CT, diagnostic peritoneal lavage had been widely used as a quick method to screen for hemoperitoneum after blunt trauma. Although it has high sensitivity (>95%) for detecting hemorrhage, peritoneal lavage cannot distinguish between inconsequential and severe bleeding, evaluate the retroperitoneum, or show the source or extent of injury (60). Furthermore, the absence of hemoperitoneum does not exclude the presence of organ injury. Currently, the major indications for peritoneal lavage are evaluation of the child who is hemodynamically unstable or who has a severe head injury and is unable to undergo abdominal CT.
Sonography, primarily using the four-quadrant abdominal scanning technique referred to as focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST), has also been used in the trauma resuscitation process (61,62,63,64,65). The main role of FAST in patients with blunt abdominal trauma is detection of hemoperitoneum. However, the sonographic examination is often impaired by abdominal tenderness and the ileus associated with trauma. In addition, like peritoneal lavage, FAST cannot identify the source of bleeding or evaluate the retroperitoneum. Using CT as the confirmatory test, recent data have shown a sensitivity for FAST of 42%, specificity of 98%, positive-predictive value of 67%, and negative-predictive value of 93% (65). Given the poor performance of FAST, CT remains a better screening test for blunt abdominal trauma (61,62,63,64,65).
Technique
CT examinations for evaluation of abdominal trauma should be performed with intravenous contrast medium. Intravenous contrast agent improves differentiation between normal and pathologic parenchyma, and it aids in detection of active arterial bleeding and extravasation of contrast-opacified urine (66,67). Normal parenchyma enhances, whereas hematomas and lacerations do not. Intravenous contrast medium can be administered by a power injector or hand injection. Scanning is usually initiated 55 to 60 seconds after the start of contrast administration (see Chapter 1 for more detail).
The use of oral contrast medium is controversial. Disadvantages of oral contrast use include delay in diagnosis and treatment of injuries, and risks of vomiting and aspiration (68). Recent studies in adults have suggested that bowel and mesenteric injuries requiring surgical intervention are not missed when patients undergo CT with a multirow detector scanner without oral contrast material (69,70,71,72). Experience (personal communication) in pediatric trauma patients also suggests that oral contrast is not necessary for diagnostic accuracy when CT examinations are performed on a multirow detector scanner.
The abdomen should be scanned from the dome of the diaphragm to the pubic symphysis. Delayed scans obtained 3 to 5 minutes after the initial helical acquisition may help to assess the renal collecting system and the urinary bladder. Typical collimation and pitch are 0.75 to 1.5 mm and 1 to 1.5, respectively, for a 16-row detector, and 0.6 to 1.25 mm and 1 to 1.5, respectively, for a 64-row detector. Images are reviewed with 3- to 5-mm section thickness at lung, soft tissue, and bone windows. Lung windows are useful to detect pneumothorax and pneumoperitoneum. Small pneumothoraces identified solely on abdominal CT scans, however, uncommonly require tube thoracostomy (73).
Prior to the initiation of scanning, all extraneous tubes, catheters, and metallic leads should be removed from the scanning field to reduce streak artifacts that otherwise might degrade the image and mimic a traumatic injury. Artifacts also can be minimized by positioning the patient's arms above the head rather than along the sides of the body.
Pathology
Hemoperitoneum
Hemoperitoneum in children with blunt abdominal trauma is usually associated with other injuries (74). The most commonly associated injuries are hepatic and splenic injuries, followed by retroperitoneal injuries, isolated pelvic fracture, and bladder or bowel injury. The presence of hemoperitoneum on a single CT study indicates the quantity of blood loss between the time of injury and the CT examination. It does not indicate that active bleeding is present or the need for surgical intervention.
Hemoperitoneum initially pools near the site of bleeding and then flows into more dependent recesses of the peritoneal cavity (Fig. 13.14). Morison pouch or the posterior subhepatic space is the most dependent recess in the upper abdomen and hence, the most common site of blood accumulation in upper abdominal injury (Fig. 13.14B). Other common sites of blood accumulation are the perihepatic (right subphrenic) and perisplenic (left subphrenic) spaces (Fig. 13.14A and B), paracolic gutters (lateral peritoneal recesses) (Fig. 13.14C), and the pelvis, particularly the posterior cul-de-sac and the paravesical fossae (Fig. 13.14D). Large collections of blood may be seen in the pelvis, even when there is little blood in upper abdominal sites. Therefore, it is important to
P.437

scan the entire pelvis in patients undergoing CT for blunt abdominal trauma to determine the extent of hemoperitoneum.
Figure 13.14. Hemoperitoneum. A: An 8-year-old boy with a splenic laceration. CT through the upper abdomen shows blood in the perihepatic (PH) and perisplenic (PS) spaces. B: At a lower level, blood is present in Morison pouch (M), the most dependent recess in the upper abdomen, and the perihepatic (PH) and perisplenic (PS) spaces. C: CT through the lower abdomen shows blood pooling in the paracolic gutters (G). D: A scan through the lower pelvis shows a moderate amount of blood in the cul-de-sac (C). Note the relatively low attenuation of freshly extravasated blood compared with enhanced organs and vessels. BL, bladder.
The CT appearance of hemoperitoneum depends on the age of the blood and whether it is free flowing or clotted (75). Freshly extravasated intraperitoneal blood is isodense to circulating blood (i.e., 30 HU to 45 HU) on noncontrast CT scans and hypodense on contrast-enhanced scans. Within hours of the acute injury, clot formation begins and the attenuation value of the blood increases, measuring 50 to 100 HU. Very densely clotted blood may have an attenuation value exceeding 100 HU. Several days after the injury, clot lysis begins and the attenuation value of the blood begins to decrease. After 2 to 3 weeks, the attenuation of the lysed blood is close to that of water (0 to 20 HU). In some cases, acute or resolving hemoperitoneum may show a hematocrit effect with layering of the lighter, low-attenuation supernatant serum on the heavier, high-attenuation sedimented erythrocytes and clot.
Hemoperitoneum usually shows substantial clearing or resolution by 1 week after the injury. Hemoperitoneum that remains unchanged 5 or more days after injury or increases in volume should raise concern for ongoing intraperitoneal bleeding.
P.438

Figure 13.15. Sentinel clot. CT scan though the upper abdomen shows a hepatic laceration (arrow) and high-attenuation clotted blood (B), termed a sentinel clot, in the perihepatic space. Lower-attenuation fresh (unclotted) blood is seen lateral to the sentinel clot.
Focal High-attenuation Fluid Collections
High-attenuation perivisceral clot, the so-called sentinel clot, is a sensitive finding of organ injury. The sentinel clot occurs in close proximity to a site of visceral injury (Fig. 13.15) (76) and on occasion, it may be the only sign to indicate the site of origin of visceral hemorrhage.
Figure 13.16. Active arterial extravasation. CT image through the upper abdomen shows an area of extravasated contrast-enhanced blood (arrows) within a right hepatic lobe laceration. Note also a small aorta and inferior vena cava and low-attenuation, nonenhancing, splenic parenchyma indicating hypovolemic shock.
Active arterial hemorrhage occurs within or near a site of visceral injury (Fig. 13.16) (66,67,77,78,79). Most frequently it is seen as a focal jet of extravasated contrast material with an attenuation value that is isodense to the abdominal aorta and its major branches. It is often surrounded by a large, low-attenuation hematoma. The demonstration of active arterial extravasation on CT almost always indicates the need for emergency laparotomy or angiographic embolization.
Hypovolemic Shock
Visceral injuries producing large volumes of intraperitoneal blood and large losses of fluid into the gastrointestinal tract may result in substantial loss of circulatory volume (i.e., hypovolemia) and hypovolemic shock. As mentioned previously, patients who are hemodynamically unstable and demonstrate signs of hypovolemic shock require surgery rather than radiologic evaluation. Occasionally, however, a patient with active abdominal hemorrhage may become hemodynamically stable and then undergo CT examination. In some of these patients, the CT examination may show signs of persistent systemic hypovolemia and hypovolemic shock. Recognition of these signs is critical, because the patient requires close monitoring of vital signs and immediate fluid resuscitation.
In patients with systemic hypovolemia, CT images show a flattened or collapsed inferior vena cava and renal veins, indicating decreased central venous return and sometimes a small aorta. CT findings indicating hypovolemic shock include diffuse dilatation of bowel by fluid, abnormally intense contrast enhancement of the bowel wall and mesentery, dense bilateral nephrograms without contrast excretion into the collecting system, small aorta and inferior vena cava, low-attenuation spleen, and moderate to large peritoneal fluid collections (Fig. 13.17) (80,81,82).
Specific Injuries
Liver
The liver is the most commonly injured abdominal organ in children with blunt abdominal trauma, accounting for approximately 40% of blunt abdominal injuries (2,7,83). The right hepatic lobe is injured in about 80% of children, the left lobe in approximately 20%, and the caudate lobe in <2%. Multiple hepatic segments are injured in 35% of children. The posterior segment of the right lobe is injured more often than the anterior segment. Injuries to the left lobe are evenly divided between the medial and lateral segments (84). Right lobe injuries are often associated with rib fractures, pneumothorax, lung contusion, and
P.439

injuries to the right kidney. Left lobe injuries are more likely to be associated with pancreatic and duodenal injuries.
Figure 13.17. Hypovolemic shock. A: CT scan through the upper abdomen shows fluid-filled small bowel with intensely enhancing walls and a small inferior vena cava (arrow). B: CT in another patient shows a small aorta, collapsed inferior vena cava, constricted renal vessels, increased bowel wall enhancement, and hemoperitoneum.
An injury severity score system based on the amount of anatomic disruption has been developed for categorizing hepatic injuries (Table 13.1) (85). However, the accuracy of this system in predicting clinical outcome and the need for surgical intervention has not been encouraging (7).
Table 13.1 Liver Injury Scale
Grade Type of Injury Description of Injury
I Hematoma Subcapsular, <10% surface area
  Laceration Capsular tear, <1 cm parenchymal depth
II Hematoma Subcapsular,10% to 50% surface area intraparenchymal <10 cm in diameter
  Laceration Capsular tear 1–3 cm parenchymal depth, <10 cm long
III Hematoma Subcapsular, >50% surface area of ruptured subcapsular or parenchymal hematoma; intraparenchymal hematoma >10 cm or expanding
  Laceration >3 cm parenchymal depth
IV Laceration Parenchymal disruption involving 25% to 75% hepatic lobe or 1–3 Couinaud segments
V Laceration Parenchymal disruption involving >75% of hepatic lobe or >3 Couinaud segments within a single lobe
  Vascular Juxtahepatic venous injuries; i.e., retrohepatic vena cava/central major hepatic veins
VI Vascular Hepatic avulsion
From Moore EE, Cogbill TH, Jurkovich GJ, et al. Organ injury scaling: spleen and liver (1994 revision). J Trauma 1995;38:323–324.
The principal types of hepatic injuries seen on CT include hematomas, lacerations, and vascular injuries. Knowledge of the extent of injury, relationship of the injury to major vascular structures, and the presence of active bleeding are the major determinants of surgical or nonoperative management. For example, lacerations extending into the porta hepatis are more closely associated with biliary tract and vascular injuries and are more likely to need surgery.
Hepatic hematomas may be intraparenchymal or subcapsular (86). Subcapsular hematomas flatten or compress the underlying hepatic parenchyma, appearing as low-attenuation, lenticular-shaped fluid collections between the capsule and enhancing parenchyma. Most are found along the anterolateral margin of the right hepatic lobe (Fig. 13.18). Parenchymal hematomas appear as round or oval hypoattenuating lesions with irregular or smooth margins. They may contain areas of high-attenuation clotted blood (Fig. 13.19).
Lacerations are the most common type of hepatic injury. On enhanced CT, liver lacerations appear as irregular linear or branching, low-attenuation areas within the higher attenuation enhancing hepatic parenchyma (Figs. 13.20 and 13.21). Multiple parallel lacerations resulting in a branching or stellate pattern are termed bear claw lacerations (Fig. 13.22) (86). Lacerations can be classified as superficial (<3 cm depth from the surface) or deep (>3 cm depth). Deep lacerations that extend between two visceral surfaces may result in fragmentation of the liver and isolated nonperfused
P.440

devitalized segments (Fig. 13.23). Small amounts of gas can be seen within hematomas and lacerations (Fig. 13.23) (87,88). The gas is thought to be secondary to hepatic ischemia and necrosis and does not necessarily indicate infection.
Figure 13.18. Subcapsular hematoma. CT scan demonstrates a lenticular-shaped fluid collection (white arrows) compressing and displacing the liver parenchyma medially. Note also an associated fracture in the right hepatic lobe (black arrows) and periportal edema (open arrow).
Vascular injuries are rare following blunt abdominal trauma. However, injuries to the hepatic veins or inferior vena cava are life-threatening lesions with a high mortality, because they can result in rapid exsanguination when the liver is mobilized at the time of surgery. CT findings suggesting vascular injury are lacerations extending into the region of the intrahepatic inferior vena cava or one of the three major veins and extensive hemorrhage behind the right lobe of the liver, in the lesser sac, or near the diaphragm (Fig. 13.24) (86).
Figure 13.19. Intrahepatic hematoma. Contrast-enhanced CT scan demonstrates a rounded collection of blood (black arrow) in the posterior part of the right hepatic lobe. A nasogastric tube (white arrow) is present in the stomach.
Figure 13.20. Superficial hepatic lacerations. Note linear low-attenuation lacerations <3 cm from the surface (arrows) in the right hepatic lobe.
Periportal halos, defined as circumferential zones of decreased attenuation around the intrahepatic portal vein and its branches, are another common feature of hepatic trauma (Figs. 13.18 and 13.25) (89,90,91,92). These halos represent either blood or edema in the loose areolar
P.441

zone around the portal triad sructures. The edema is probably secondary to the third spacing of fluids during vigorous resuscitation. This sign may also be seen in patients with tension pneumothorax or pericardial tamponade, probably secondary to obstructed lymphatic drainage.
Figure 13.21. Deep hepatic laceration. CT scan demonstrates a deep (>3 cm from the surface) laceration (arrows) in the right hepatic lobe and associated blood in the perihepatic and perisplenic spaces.
Figure 13.22. Multiple hepatic lacerations. Note multiple branching low-attenuation lacerations in the medial segment of the left lobe. This appearance has been termed bear-claw laceration.
Hepatic lacerations and hematomas usually decrease in size and attenuation over 2 to 3 weeks (93). They occasionally increase in size on early follow-up scans (i.e., within 7 days of injury), probably owing to coalescence of the lesions. Lacerations heal more rapidly than hematomas, often showing significant involution within the first month of injury. Hematomas may persist for 6 months or longer, possibly because bile in the hematoma delays clot resorption (94). Subcapsular hematomas usually resolve within 6 to 8 weeks (94).
Figure 13.23. Hepatic laceration with devascularization. A deep laceration (>10 cm from the surface) (black arrows) extends between the visceral surfaces of the right hepatic lobe, resulting in an isolated, nonperfused posterior segment. There is abrupt termination of the right portal vein as it enters the devascularized portion. Note also a small bubble of gas (white arrow) in the nonperfused segment.
Figure 13.24. Inferior vena caval injury. CT reveals active extravasation in a right lobe laceration that extends into the region of the inferior vena cava (white arrow). The cava is flattened and irregular. Extravasated contrast is seen immediately behind the cava (black arrow) and in the right perihepatic space, consistent with active bleeding. Also note a constricted aorta and low-attenuation splenic parenchyma secondary to hypovolemic shock. Lacerated inferior vena cava confirmed surgically. (Same patient as in Figure 13.16.)
Figure 13.25. Periportal low attenuation. CT image shows low-attenuation areas (arrows) around the enhanced portal vein. There was no CT evidence of hepatic injury. The periportal low attenuation was attributed to elevated central venous pressure following vigorous fluid resuscitation.
P.442

Complications occur in about 10% of patients with hepatic injuries and include abscess, biloma, hemobilia, and pseudoaneurysm (84,95,96). Hepatic abscess appears as a focal low-attenuation fluid collection with enhancing walls. Occasionally, abscesses contain gas bubbles or are surrounded by a low-attenuation halo of edematous parenchyma. CT findings of biloma are a well-defined, low-attenuation lesion in or around the liver. Differentiation between abscess and biloma may require percutaneous needle or surgical aspiration. Hemobilia results when there is a communication between the hepatic arterial system and the biliary tree. The CT finding of hemobilia is a high-attenuation focus within the gallbladder lumen. Blood within the gallbladder resulting from biliary ductal trauma needs to be distinguished from primary gallbladder injury (see below). Hepatic pseudoaneurysms result when lacerations cross the hepatic arteries. They enhance following administration of intravenous contrast material.
Pitfalls in Diagnosis
Beam-hardening artifact from adjacent ribs and streak artifacts from air–contrast interfaces may mimic hepatic lacerations or hematomas. Rib artifacts can be recognized by their location adjacent to a rib; they also become broader as they go deeper into the liver substance. Streak artifacts from air–fluid or air–contrast levels in stomach or bowel usually are more regular, linear, and better defined than true lacerations. Congenital clefts also can mimic lacerations. Associated hemoperitoneum supports the diagnosis of hepatic injury rather than a congenital cleft.
Table 13.2 Spleen Injury Scale
Grade Injury Type Description of Injury
I Hematoma Subcapsular, <10% surface area
  Laceration Capsular tear, <1 cm parenchymal depth
II Hematoma Subcapsular, 10%–50% surface area intraparenchymal, <5 cm in diameter
  Laceration Capsular tear, 1–3 cm parenchymal depth that does not involve a trabecular vessel
III Hematoma Subcapsular, >50% surface area or expanding;   ruptured subcapsular or parenchymal hematoma; intraparenchymal hematoma ≥5 cm or expanding
  Laceration >3 cm parenchymal depth or involving trabecular vessels
IV Laceration Laceration involving segmental or hilar vessels producing major devascularization (>25% of spleen)
V Laceration Completely shattered spleen
  Vascular Hilar vascular injury with devascularizes spleen
From Moore EE, Cogbill TH, Jurkovich GJ, et al. Organ injury scaling: spleen and liver (1994 revision). J Trauma 1995;38:323–324, with permission.
Gallbladder and Biliary Tract
Blunt injury to the gallbladder and biliary tree are rare. CT findings of gallbladder injury include pericholecystic fluid, thickening or interruption of the gallbladder wall, an enhancing mucosal flap within the gallbladder lumen, and high-attenuation intraluminal clot (97,98). Avulsion results in displacement of the gallbladder from its fossa (98). Pericholecystic fluid and a collapsed gallbladder lumen are nonspecific findings but should elicit concern for gallbladder trauma if associated with other CT signs of gallbladder injury.
Blunt injuries to the biliary tract are usually associated with hepatic parenchymal lacerations and take the form of biloma formation and hemobilia. Hemobilia on CT appears as a high-attenuation fluid collection within the gallbladder lumen. A late sequela of bile duct injury is biliary stricture.
Spleen
The spleen is the second most frequently injured abdominal organ in children with blunt abdominal trauma, accounting for approximately 30% of abdominal injuries (2). An injury severity score based on the extent of anatomic disruption of the spleen on CT has been developed to classify splenic injuries. The scoring system for splenic injuries is scaled from I to V, indicating the least to most severe injury (Table 13.2). However, similar to the scenario in the liver, it cannot
P.443

reliably predict the success or failure of nonoperative management versus surgical intervention.
Figure 13.26. Subcapsular splenic hematoma. CT scans shows a low-attenuation subcapsular hematoma (arrow) compressing underlying splenic parenchyma.
The spectrum of splenic injuries is similar to that seen in the liver and includes subcapsular and parenchymal hematoma, laceration, and vascular pedicle injury (99). Subcapsular hematomas are typically seen as crescentic, low-attenuation fluid collections that flatten the underlying parenchyma on contrast-enhanced CT scans (Fig. 13.26) (99). Intrasplenic hematomas appear as round or oval hypoattenuating lesions with smooth or irregular margins (Fig. 13.27). They may contain high-attenuation regions, reflecting active arterial hemorrhage.
Figure 13.27. Splenic hematoma. Contrast-enhanced CT scan demonstrates a focal high-attenuation area of active arterial extravasation surrounded by low-attenuation blood (arrow).
Figure 13.28. Splenic lacerations. A: Contrast-enhanced CT scan demonstrates a deep low-attenuation laceration (black arrow) and two superficial lacerations (white arrows) in the area of the splenic hilum. B: CT in another patient shows a deep laceration (black arrow) in the lower pole of the spleen. Note also a small subcapsular hepatic hematoma (white arrow).
Splenic lacerations appear as linear or branching low-attenuation areas (Fig. 13.28). Similar to the liver, splenic lacerations are classified as superficial (<3 cm depth from the surface) or deep (>3 cm depth). Deep lacerations that traverse the full thickness of the splenic parenchyma often extend into splenic hilum, injuring a branch artery and resulting in segmental or lobar nonperfusion (i.e., infarction) (Fig. 13.29). Multiple lacerations, usually resulting from a compressive force, are termed a shattered spleen (Fig. 13.30).
Vascular pedicle injuries include avulsion and occlusion of the splenic artery. CT findings of main splenic
P.444

artery avulsion and occlusion are a normal-sized, nonenhancing spleen. There is minimal hemoperitoneum with arterial thrombosis, whereas avulsion is associated with a large hemoperitoneum (Fig. 13.31). Occlusion of a segmental vessel results in a wedge-shaped, unenhancing area with the base at the splenic capsule and its apex pointing toward the splenic hilum. In both avulsion and occlusion, the upper pole of the spleen can be perfused by short gastric arteries.
Figure 13.29. Laceration with associated infarction. CT shows a deep laceration (arrow) of the spleen. Note the area of nonperfused parenchyma posteriorly, consistent with thrombosis or injury of the artery of the affected segment. Normal splenic enhancement is seen anteriorly. Also noted is perihepatic fluid.
Perisplenic hematoma usually resolves within 2 to 4 weeks (99,100). Intrasplenic hematomas and lacerations decrease in attenuation and become more sharply circumscribed as they diminish. Small hematomas and lacerations may resolve within several weeks, whereas larger hematomas and tears may require several months to heal (99). Splenic injuries may resolve with no sequelae, leave a deformed splenic margin, or form a posttraumatic pseudocyst (Fig. 13.32) or pseudoaneurysm. Pseudocyst is seen as a well-defined, low attenuation lesion, whereas the pseudoaneurysm appears as a well-circumscribed area of dense vascular enhancement.
Figure 13.30. Shattered spleen. The spleen is shattered into multiple separate pieces, some of which are still perfused. Blood is noted in the perisplenic space.
Figure 13.31. Splenic pedicle avulsion. Contrast-enhanced CT shows a large hemoperitoneum (H) and absent perfusion of the splenic (S) parenchyma, which contains several small gas bubbles secondary to tissue necrosis. Periportal edema (arrowheads) is also present.
An increase in splenic volume of >10% may be seen on serial CT scans after blunt abdominal trauma and is not a sign of deterioration. The apparent splenic enlargement is thought to represent a return of the spleen to normal size following physiologic contraction in response to adrenergic stimulation and volume depletion at the time of initial injury (101).
Delayed splenic rupture, defined as hemorrhage after an asymptomatic period of 48 hours, has been described in some patients whose initial CT scans were interpreted as normal (102). Poor contrast enhancement of the splenic parenchyma, making injury indistinguishable from normal parenchyma, in part may explain the false-negative diagnoses. In other cases, true delayed rupture of an intrasplenic or subcapsular hematoma may be the cause of late-onset hemorrhage.
Pitfalls in Diagnosis
Congenital splenic clefts may simulate splenic lacerations. Clefts are commonly located along the superomedial
P.445

aspect of the spleen, are smoothly marginated, and are not accompanied by perisplenic or intraperitoneal blood (Fig. 13.33). Splenic lacerations usually involve the lateral splenic border, are irregular, and are frequently associated with hemoperitoneum. Streak artifacts from metallic leads, nasogastric tubes and/or air–contrast levels in the stomach, and beam-hardening artifacts from ribs can also result in a false-positive diagnosis of splenic injury. Artifacts usually have sharper margins than true lacerations, may extend beyond the splenic border, and are not associated with perisplenic clot or hemoperitoneum.
Figure 13.32. Splenic pseudocyst. A: CT scan at time of initial injury shows a low-attenuation deep splenic laceration (arrow) extending to the splenic hilum. There is associated perisplenic and perihepatic blood. B: The patient returned 6 weeks later with increasing flank pain. CT scan demonstrates a large pseudocyst (C). The laceration (arrow) is still visible.
Figure 13.33. Congenital splenic clefts. Two low-attenuation clefts (arrows) are present in the body of the spleen on its medial surface. The smooth margination of the clefts and the lack of a perisplenic hematoma are useful in separating a congenital splenic cleft and a laceration.
Transient splenic heterogeneity, which is a normal flow phenomenon on CT scans obtained immediately after a bolus injection of intravenous contrast medium, may simulate a splenic injury (Fig. 13.34) (103). In equivocal cases, scans acquired after equilibration of the contrast material may help differentiate between normal enhancement and laceration. On delayed scans, normal parenchyma exhibits a uniform, homogenous appearance. The injured spleen will exhibit heterogeneity and often additional findings of perisplenic clot and hemoperitoneum.
Hypoperfused splenic parenchyma associated with hypovolemic shock can mimic a vascular pedicle injury and thus be another potential pitfall in the diagnosis of splenic injury (Figs. 13.16 and 13.24) (104). This is likely a result of arterial vasoconstriction owing to sympathetic stimulation at the time of acute injury. The presence of other CT signs of hypovolemic shock (e.g., small aorta and inferior vena cava, intense bowel wall enhancement, prolonged nephrograms) is helpful in differentiating between hypoperfusion and a true vascular injury.
Kidney and Ureter
Renal injuries account for 15% to 40% of incidents of children with blunt abdominal trauma (2,5). The presence of hematuria and hypotension are two clinical signs associated with an increased likelihood of renal
P.446

trauma (105,106,107,108). Most children with renal injuries have gross or microscopic hematuria (>50 red blood cells per high-power field), but 30% can have normal urinalyses, particularly those with vascular pedicle injuries (105,106,107).
Figure 13.34. Heterogeneous splenic enhancement. Early arterial phase image demonstrates normal splenic heterogeneity, which needs to be recognized so it is not mistaken for splenic injury.
Table 13.3 Renal Injury Scale of the American Association of Surgeons in Trauma
Grade Type of Injury Description of Injury
I Contusion Microscopic or gross hematuria, normal imaging studies
  Hematoma Nonexpanding subcapsular, without parenchymal laceration
II Hematoma Nonexpanding perirenal hematoma confirmed to retroperitoneum
  Laceration <1 cm depth in the renal cortex
III Laceration >1 cm depth in the renal cortex without collecting system involvement or urine extravasation
IV Laceration Extending through renal cortex, medulla, and collecting system
  Vascular Main renal artery or vein injury without devascularization; thrombosis of a segmental renal artery without parenchymal laceration
V Laceration Completely shattered kidney
  Vascular Injuries to renal hilum with devascularization of the kidney; renal artery occlusion or disruption
From Moore EE, Cogbill TH, Malangoni MA, et al. Organ scaling injury. Surg Clin North Am 1995;75:293–303, with permission.
The mechanisms of renal injury are a direct impact, laceration by the lower ribs, or disruption by a rapid acceleration–deceleration event (108). An abnormal kidney is more susceptible to injury than a normal one. Common pre-existing abnormalities include hydronephrosis, Wilms tumor, horseshoe kidney, and renal cystic disease.
Renal injuries are classified into five broad categories based on the renal injury scale of the American Association of Surgeons in Trauma (109,110,111) (Table 13.3). The extent of the renal injury and its relationship to renal artery and vein may serve as a guide for potential surgical or angiographic intervention.
The principal types of renal injury include hematoma, laceration, and vascular injuries. Subcapsular hematomas appear crescentic and flatten the lateral contour of the kidney. They can extend into the perinephric (Gerota) fascia when the renal capsule is lacerated. Large perinephric hematomas may displace the kidney anteriorly, medially, and superiorly. On contrast-enhanced CT scans, subcapsular hematomas have lower attenuation values relative to enhancing parenchyma. On delayed scans, the attenuation value of the fluid may increase if opacified urine leaks into the subcapsular or perinephric spaces. Subacute and
P.447

chronic hematomas may demonstrate peripheral rim enhancement. Parenchymal contusions, also know as hematomas, appear as ill-defined areas of slightly increased attenuation on unenhanced CT scans. Areas of decreased enhancement or a striated nephrogram, caused by delayed tubular transit time secondary to edema, can be seen on contrast-enhanced scans (Fig. 13.35).
Figure 13.35. Renal contusion. A: Contrast-enhanced CT scan demonstrates an area of striated contrast enhancement (striated nephrogram) in the left kidney posteriorly (arrow) resulting from stasis of contrast-enhanced urine in renal tubules. B: CT in another patient shows a small hypoattenuating contusion (arrow) in the lower pole of the left kidney.
Figure 13.36. Superficial renal laceration. Contrast-enhanced CT scan shows a linear, low-attenuation laceration (black arrow) extending from the renal capsule into the parenchyma associated with a minimal perirenal hematoma (white arrow). The laceration did not extend into the collecting system.
Renal lacerations are recognized as linear or branching low-attenuation areas within the enhancing renal parenchyma (Fig. 13.36). They may be superficial (<1 cm deep) or deep (>1 cm in depth) (Figs. 13.37 and 13.38). Deep lacerations may involve the collecting system resulting in contrast extravasation; they also can transect the kidney into two parts (i.e., fractures) (Fig. 13.38). Lacerations usually
P.448

occur in an axial plane and parallel segmental arteries and veins, so that parenchymal enhancement is preserved. Multiple lacerations resulting from a compressive force are termed a shattered kidney. Some of the multiple lacerations may cross vascular structures, producing renal infarction (109,110,111,112,113).
Figure 13.37. Deep laceration. Contrast-enhanced CT demonstrates a large laceration of the interpolar region of the right kidney extending into the renal hilum with extravasation of opacified urine (arrows) into the perirenal space. A large perirenal hematoma is also present. A follow-up CT scan 6 months later showed focal cortical scarring.
Figure 13.38. Deep laceration. Axial contrast-enhanced CT scan (A) and sagittal reformation (B) show a large, distracted laceration (i.e., fracture) in the interpolar region of the left kidney transecting the kidney into two pieces. There is no extravasation of opacified urine, but there is large perirenal hematoma. Also note on the sagittal view an area of decreased contrast enhancement in the posterior lower pole of the kidney (arrow), consistent with occlusion of a segmental arterial branch.
Vascular injuries can involve the artery or vein. CT signs of main renal artery occlusion and avulsion are a normal-sized nonenhancing kidney (i.e., absent nephrogram), abrupt termination of the contrast-filled renal artery at the point of injury, and retrograde filling of the renal vein (Fig. 13.39) (109,110,111,114,115,116). Cortical rim enhancement, as a result of perfusion by capsular collateral vessels, may be seen, although usually not in the first few hours after infarction (109,110). The cortical rim sign is more typical of subacute infarction. Renal artery avulsion is associated with massive hemorrhage, involving the perirenal space and several other retroperitoneal compartments. Because arterial flow is completely disrupted, renal artery occlusion is not associated with a significant perinephric hematoma. Occlusion or laceration of a segmental or branch artery produces a peripherally based, wedge-shaped area of nonperfusion that extends to the renal capsule. CT findings of traumatic renal vein thrombosis are an enlarged rather than normal-sized kidney, persistent nephrogram, absent or decreased enhancement of the renal vein, and clot in the renal vein.
Myoglobinuria secondary to rhabdomyolysis is a rare cause of a prolonged nephrogram on CT (117). Iodinated contrast agents should be administered with caution if myoglobinuria is suspected clinically because of their potential to initiate or worsen actual renal failure. It is the discrepancy between the dark color of the urine, the positive Hematest, and the absence of significant hematuria on microscopic examination that should suggest the diagnosis of myoglobinuria.
Conservative management is appropriate for patients with grades I and II injuries and even for most patients
P.449

with grades III and IV injuries with assurance of close monitoring and the ability to intervene quickly in the event of hemodynamic instability. Contrast extravasation alone is not an indication for surgery (109,110). Traumatic thrombosis or occlusion need to be treated with prompt surgical revascularization to minimize the risk of loss of renal function. Penetrating injuries are also often an indication for surgical intervention. Category IV and V injuries often result in parenchymal atrophy. Hypertension can develop years after the renal injury (118).
Figure 13.39. Renal artery occlusion. Contrast-enhanced CT obtained 2 days after a motor vehicle accident shows absent perfusion of the left kidney except for a rim of enhanced cortical tissue, reflecting perfusion by subcapsular collateral vessels. There is retrograde flow into the left renal vein (arrow). Note also absence of an extrarenal fluid collection.
Pitfalls in Diagnosis
Artifact owing to respiratory motion of the kidney during the scan cycle can mimic a subcapsular hematoma. The absence of the “lesion” on repeat or adjacent scans provides the correct diagnosis.
Ureter
Injuries of the ureteropelvic junction are usually caused by deceleration that creates tension on the renal pedicle (119). Although the kidney is relatively mobile, the ureter is fixed in the retroperitoneum, and thus, it may be lacerated or avulsed at its junction with the renal pelvis in a deceleration injury. The diagnosis may be delayed because hematuria can be absent.
CT findings of ureteropelvic junction injuries are prompt renal excretion of contrast material, an intact collecting system, absent opacification of the ipsilateral ureter distal to the disruption, and contrast medium leakage, which may be confined to the medial perirenal space or extend into the periureteral and anterior pararenal spaces (119,120,121,122,123). Ureteropelvic junction disruption is best seen on delayed CT scans.
Bladder
Bladder injuries may occur as a result of blunt, penetrating, or iatrogenic trauma. The likelihood of bladder injury varies directly with the degree of bladder distention. A distended urinary bladder is more susceptible to injury than a decompressed one. The signs and symptoms of bladder injury are nonspecific. Patients with bladder rupture usually present with suprapubic pain or tenderness. However, in patients with concomitant pelvic fractures, the pain associated with the fractured pelvis can overshadow the pain associated with the bladder injury. Nearly all patients with bladder injuries have gross hematuria.
CT has replaced conventional cystography as the imaging method of choice for evaluating suspected bladder injury, and it can be done in conjunction with CT of the abdomen to assess potential associated injuries. CT cystography performed with adequate bladder distention is as sensitive as conventional cystography for detecting bladder injury (124,125,126,127). Causes for false-negative CT cystography include inadequate bladder distention, associated hematoma preventing contrast leakage, and extremely dilute contrast material. To optimize the sensitivity of CT cystography for diagnosis of bladder rupture, the urinary bladder should be fully distended, either by retrograde filling or antegrade filling using intravenous contrast material administration and clamping the urinary catheter (128).
The spectrum of bladder injuries includes rupture and contusion (127). Bladder rupture is further subdivided into intraperitoneal and extraperitoneal types, depending on the relationship of the tear to the peritoneal reflections. Intraperitoneal bladder rupture usually results from a direct impact to a distended bladder and necessitates operative repair. Extraperitoneal bladder rupture may result from a shearing injury at the bladder base, a direct blow, or penetration of the bladder wall by a bony spicule from a fractured pelvis. A nonpenetrating extraperitoneal bladder injury is treated with suprapubic cystostomy or transurethral catheter drainage. Penetrating bladder rupture requires surgical repair.
Intraperitoneal bladder rupture results in leakage of opacified urine into the peritoneal spaces and recesses, outlining the bladder and bowel and pooling in the paracolic gutters (Fig. 13.40) (129). Extraperitoneal rupture results in leakage of contrast and urine pooling in the prevesical (space of Retzius) and perivesical space. Extravasation may also extend into the inguinal canal, thigh, scrotum, penis, and perineum or into the anterior abdominal wall (Fig. 13.41) (124,130).
Bladder contusion is defined as an incomplete tear of the bladder mucosa or wall, resulting in hemorrhage into a localized segment of the bladder wall (126). CT findings are focal wall thickening without contrast medium leakage (125,126). Bladder contusion is self-limiting and is treated conservatively.
Adrenal Hemorrhage
Adrenal hemorrhage occurs in approximately 3% of children who sustain blunt abdominal trauma. Clinical signs and symptoms are nonspecific and include abdominal tenderness and hematuria (131). Adrenal hemorrhage is usually unilateral, commonly on the right side, and often associated with ipsilateral intra-abdominal and intrathoracic injuries. CT findings are an enlarged oval or triangular gland that is hypoattenuating relative to liver and spleen on contrast-enhanced CT scans (Fig. 13.42). Associated findings include increased attenuation of the periadrenal fat, intraperitoneal and retroperitoneal blood, and ipsilateral diaphragmatic crural thickening (131).
Pancreas
Pancreatic injuries account for <5% of all abdominal injuries from blunt trauma in children (2,5,132). They are
P.450

most often associated with motor vehicle accidents, followed by bicycle handlebar injuries, and child abuse. The common mechanism of injury is compression of the pancreas between the vertebral column and the anterior abdominal wall. Injuries of the pancreatic head are more likely to occur when the vector of force is to the right of the spine, whereas the neck, body, and tail of the pancreas are injured more often when the force of impact is midline or left sided (133). Most injuries occur in the pancreatic neck and body as the result of compression of the pancreas against the spine.
Figure 13.40. Intraperitoneal bladder rupture. A: CT scan through the upper pelvis of a young man demonstrates extravasated contrast-opacified urine in the peritoneal cavity. B: A scan through the lower pelvis demonstrates a collapsed urinary bladder (B), which contains only a small amount of contrast material and a left acetabular fracture.
Figure 13.41. Extraperitoneal bladder rupture. CT scan through the pelvis shows contrast-opacified urine from the urinary bladder within the prevesical space of Retzius (black arrow) and perivesical space (white arrow).
The early diagnosis of pancreatic injury is often difficult because clinical and laboratory findings are not specific. The typical signs of abdominal pain, leukocytosis, and elevated serum amylase levels may not be present for one or more days after the trauma. In addition, an increase in the serum amylase level may occur with salivary gland contusion or bowel injury. Moreover, serum amylase levels do not vary in proportion to the severity of pancreatic injury and may be higher in patients with pancreatic contusions than in those with pancreatic fractures.
Pancreatic injuries include contusion or hematoma, laceration, transection (i.e., fracture), ductal disruption, and pancreatitis (133). On contrast-enhanced CT, hematoma appears as a poorly marginated, hypoattenuating area within the normal enhancing parenchyma. Laceration (less than full-thickness injury) and transection (full-thickness injury) appear as a low-attenuation linear cleft coursing perpendicular to the long axis of the gland (133,134,135,136) (Fig. 13.43). Pancreatic duct disruption cannot be directly seen on CT. However, ductal injury can be suggested based on the degree of parenchymal injury (137). Deep lacerations (>50% pancreatic thickness) and transections are commonly associated with ductal disruption (137) (Fig. 13.43). The duct is usually intact when there is a superficial laceration (<50% pancreatic thickness).
Unexplained fluid in the anterior pararenal space or lesser sac should strongly suggest the possibility of pancreatic injury (132,133,135,138,139). However, fluid in the anterior pararenal space is not de facto evidence of
P.451

pancreatic injury. Other causes of peripancreatic fluid include third spacing of intravascular fluid in children with hypovolemic shock (81,82), blood extending from a splenic injury or bare area of the liver, blood or bowel contents extending from a duodenal injury, and blood or urine dissecting from a renal injury following disruption of the renal fascia (122).
Figure 13.42. Adrenal hematoma. Axial CT (A) and coronal reformation (B) show an enlarged right adrenal gland (arrow) that is hypoattenuating to the enhancing kidney.
Figure 13.43. Pancreatic laceration with disruption of the pancreatic duct. CT scan through the upper abdomen demonstrates a low-attenuation fracture (arrow) separating the pancreatic body and neck. A small amount of fluid is seen around the tail of the pancreas. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography demonstrated ductal disruption.
CT findings of pancreatitis include focal or diffuse enlargement of the gland, increased attenuation of the peripancreatic fat, thickening of the renal fascia, and intrapancreatic or extrapancreatic fluid collections (132,133,135). Posttraumatic pancreatitis is the result of autodigestion by pancreatic enzymes liberated after the injury. In general, pancreatic inflammatory changes evolve over time and usually will not be present immediately following the injury.
The severity of pancreatic injury is graded based on the modified Moore organ injury scale (140) (Table 13.4). Disruption of the pancreatic duct is treated surgically or by endoscopy with stent placement, whereas injuries without duct involvement are treated conservatively (137,140). Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or MR pancreatography may be necessary for further evaluation of ductal anatomy when CT findings are equivocal (133,137).
Damage to the ductal system is the principal determinant of the development of significant complications,
P.452

such as pseudocyst, abscess formation, pancreatic fistula, and sepsis (137,140). The CT appearance of pseudocyst and abscess is that of a low-attenuation fluid collection with well-defined, enhancing walls (Fig. 13.44). A specific diagnosis of abscess can be made if the mass contains air or an air–fluid level. Otherwise percutaneous or surgical aspiration will be required for differentiation.
TABLE 13.4 Pancreatic Injury Severity Scale
Grade Injury Description
I Minor contusion or superficial laceration without duct injury
II Major contusion or laceration without duct injury or tissue loss
III Distal transection or parenchymal injury with duct injury
IV Proximal transection or parenchymal injury involving ampulla
V Massive disruption of pancreatic head
From Moore EE, Cogbill TH, Malangoni MA, et al. Organ injury scaling: pancreas, duodenum, small bowel, colon, and rectum. J Trauma 1990;30:1427–1429, with permission.
Figure 13.44. Pancreatic pseudocyst. Initial CT had shown a fracture at the junction of the pancreatic body and neck. Follow-up CT 1 month later demonstrates a low-attenuation pseudocyst (C).
Pitfalls in Diagnosis
Pancreatic fractures can be difficult to diagnose on CT. False-negative diagnoses can result if CT scans (<12 hours), because the lacerated pancreatic fragments may be closely apposed. As intrapancreatic and peripancreatic edema and inflammation develop over time, the pancreatic fragments separate, and the diagnosis of pancreatic trauma becomes more evident. False-positive diagnoses of pancreatic fracture or laceration can result when streak artifacts from gastric air–fluid levels or physiologic thinning of the pancreatic neck are mistaken as a pancreatic injury (141). Additionally, unopacified jejunal loops adjacent to the pancreatic tail may be mistaken for focal pancreatic swelling. These pitfalls can be avoided by careful scrutiny of contiguous CT sections.
Bowel and Mesentery
Bowel and mesentery injuries account for 5% to 15% of blunt abdominal injuries in children (2,142). They are most often caused by bicycle handlebars, child abuse, and the use of lap-type seat belt restraints (12). The diagnosis of intestinal or mesenteric injury is often difficult because clinical findings such as abdominal pain, tenderness, and vomiting are nonspecific. Peritoneal signs, such as rigidity, rebound tenderness, and absent bowel sounds, may not be apparent for several hours or days. Massive bleeding is uncommon, although minimal hematemesis or melena is not unusual. Linear ecchymosis or the seat belt sign should increase concern for bowel and mesenteric injury (12,143).
The mechanisms of injury include (a) direct compression of bowel between the anterior abdominal wall and the spine; (b) a shearing injury near sites of relatively fixed ligaments and mesenteric attachments, such as the ligament of Treitz and ileocecal junction; and (c) an abrupt marked increase in intraluminal pressure. Injuries to bowel usually involve the second and third portions of the duodenum and the proximal jejunum. The duodenum is retroperitoneal and relatively immobile anterior to the spine, whereas the proximal jejunum is fixed by the ligament of Treitz. Ileal, colonic, and gastric injuries occur, but they are less common than proximal bowel injuries. Bowel and mesenteric injuries include contusion/ hematoma, laceration, and complete transection.
CT signs of bowel laceration and transection include free intraperitoneal or retroperitoneal air, extraluminal contrast material, bowel wall disruption, thickened bowel wall, abnormal bowel wall enhancement, and infiltration of the mesentery (143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151). Free air in the peritoneal cavity or retroperitoneum is present on CT in 33% to 65% of children with bowel perforations (143,146). Pneumoperitoneum is most often seen in the subdiaphragmatic area, anterior to the liver (Fig. 13.45).
P.453

Extraluminal air may also accumulate in the leaves of the mesentery or in the retroperitoneum, commonly in the right paraduodenal and anterior pararenal spaces. Although extraluminal air is highly suggestive of bowel perforation, it is not pathognomonic. Other causes of extraluminal air include dissection of air from a pneumothorax or pneumomediastinum, peritoneal lavage prior to CT, and intraperitoneal bladder rupture (143,145,146). Extraluminal contrast material and bowel wall disruption are specific signs of bowel perforation, but unfortunately these signs occur in a minority of patients (7% and <1%, respectively) (143).
Figure 13.45. Pneumoperitoneum. CT scan at soft tissue windows shows free intraperitoneal air (open arrows) over the anterior surface of the liver and in the falciform ligament (arrowhead).
CT signs of bowel contusion/hematoma include thickened bowel wall, intraluminal hematoma, and abnormal wall enhancement (Figs. 13.46 and 13.47) (145). The wall thickening can be eccentric or circumferential and is commonly associated with luminal narrowing (Fig. 13.47). The attenuation of the hematoma is relatively high initially, but it decreases as the blood matures. Wall thickening is not a specific indicator of bowel injury, and it can be seen with insufficient bowel distention or bowel edema secondary to systemic volume overload or the hypoperfusion complex (145,151,152). Wall enhancement also can be seen with hypovolemic shock.
CT findings specific to mesenteric injury include active mesenteric bleeding, mesenteric vasculature beading, and abrupt termination of the mesenteric vessels (145). Although these findings are relatively specific for mesenteric injury, they have low sensitivity. Mesenteric stranding, fluid in the mesenteric root, and focal hematoma are less specific findings of mesenteric injury (Fig. 13.48).
Figure 13.46. Duodenal hematoma. CT scan through the upper abdomen demonstrates a large, high-attenuation hematoma (H) in the transverse portion of the duodenum. A thin rim of oral contrast material (arrows) surrounds the hematoma.
Figure 13.47. Jejunal hematoma. CT scan at the level of the pancreatic head (P) demonstrates circumferential thickening of the jejunal walls (arrows), consistent with intramural hematoma.
Intraperitoneal and retroperitoneal fluid is a common finding in both bowel and mesenteric injuries (143,145). The specificity of this sign is low if there are other concomitant injuries. If no associated injury is noted, bowel or mesenteric injury should be suspected, particularly if there are moderate or large amounts of fluid (143,145,153). Free intraperitoneal fluid from bowel perforation commonly accumulates between bowel loops (i.e., the interloop compartment) and typically has a triangular appearance. By comparison, free intraperitoneal fluid related to solid organ injuries (e.g., liver or spleen) is
P.454

most commonly seen in the paracolic gutters and the pelvis, sparing the interloop spaces.
Figure 13.48. Mesenteric hematoma. CT scan through the lower abdomen shows hematoma (H) in the transverse mesocolon.
Free extraluminal air and focal bowel wall thickening are associated with a strong likelihood of a bowel injury that requires surgical repair (143). Complications of blunt trauma to the bowel or mesentery include ischemia, infarction, and stricture of the bowel lumen (154).
References
1. Breaux CW, Smith G, Georgeson KE. The first two year's experience with major trauma at a pediatric trauma center. J Trauma 1990;30:37–43.
2. Cooper A, Barlow B, DiScala C, et al. Mortality and truncal injury: the pediatric perspective. J Pediatr Surg 1994;29:33–38.
3. Bhutta ST, Greenberg SB, Fitch SJ, et al. All-terrain vehicle injuries in children: injury patterns and prognostic implications. Pediatr Radiol 2004;34:130–133.
4. Kaufman RA. CT of blunt abdominal trauma in children: a five-year experience. In Siegel MR, ed. Pediatric Body CT. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1988:313–347.
5. Kaufman RA, Towbin R, Babcock DS, et al. Upper abdominal trauma in children: imaging evaluation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1984;142:449–460.
6. Stylianos S, Hicks BA. Abdominal Trauma. In: Oldham KT, Colombani PM, Foglia RP, Skinner MA, eds. Practical and Pediatric of Pediatric Surgery. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005:431–446.
7. Taylor GA. Imaging of pediatric blunt abdominal trauma: what have we learned in the past decade? Radiology 1995;195:600–601.
8. Taylor GA, Fallat ME, Potter BM, et al. The role of computed tomography in blunt abdominal trauma in children. J Trauma 1988;28:1660–1664.
9. Stylianos S, Hicks BA. Abdominal trauma. In: Oldham KT, Colombani PM, Foglia RP, Skinner MA, eds. Principles and Practice of Pediatric Surgery. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005;431–446.
10. Jaffe D, Wesson D. Emergency management of blunt trauma in children. N Engl J Med 1991;324:1377–1482.
11. Hennes HM, Smith DS, Schneider K, et al. Elevated liver transaminase levels in children with blunt abdominal trauma: A predictor of liver injury. Pediatrics 1990;86:87–90.
12. Sivit CJ, Taylor GA, Newman KD. Safety-belt injuries in children with lap-belt ecchymosis: CT findings in 61 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991;157:111–114.
13. Taylor GA, Eichelberger MR, O'Donnell R, et al. Indications for computed tomography in children with blunt abdominal trauma. Ann Surg 1991;213:212–218.
14. Beaver BL, Colombani PM, Fal A, et al. The efficacy of computed tomography in evaluating abdominal injuries in children with major head trauma. J Pediatr Surg 1987;22; 1117–1122.
15. Taylor GA, Eichelberger MR. Abdominal CT in children with neurologic impairment following blunt trauma. Ann Surg 1989;210:229–233.
16. Haaga JR. Commentary. Radiation dose management weighing risk versus benefit. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;177:289–291.
17. Siegel MJ, Suess C, Schmidt B, et al. Radiation dose and image quality in pediatric CT: effect of technical factors and phantom size and shape. Radiology 2004;233:515–522.
18. Sivit CJ, Taylor GA, Eichelberger MR. Chest injury in children with blunt abdominal trauma: evaluation with CT. Radiology 1989;171:815–818.
19. Nakayama DK, Ramenofsky ML, Rowe MI. Chest injuries in childhood. Ann Surg 1989;210:770.
20. Mirvis SE, Templeton P. Imaging in acute thoracic trauma. Semin Roentgenol 1992;27:184–210.
21. Molina PL, Quinn MT, Bouchard EW, et al. Computed tomography of thoracoabdominal trauma. In: Lee JKT, Sagel SS, Stanley RJ, et al., eds. Computed Body Tomography with MRI Correlation. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006:1417–1480.
22. Stark P. Radiology of thoracic trauma. Invest Radiol 1990;25:1265–1275.
23. Thoongsuwan N, Kanne JP, Stern EJ. Spectrum of blunt chest injuries. J Thorac Imaging 2005;20:89–97.
24. Manson D, Babyn PS, Palder S, et al. CT of blunt chest trauma in children. Pediatr Radiol 1993;23:1–5.
25. Bridges KG, Welch G, Silver M, et al. CT detection of occult pneumothorax in multiple trauma patients. J Emer Med 1993;11:179–186.
26. Wolfman NT, Myers WS, Glauser SJ, et al. Validity of CT classification on management of occult pneumothorax: a prospective study. AJR am J Roentgenol 1998;171:1317–1320.
27. Curtin JJ, Goodman LR, Quebbeman EJ, et al. Thoracostomy tubes after acute chest injury: relationship between location in a pleural fissure and function. AJR am J Roentgenol 1994;163:1339–1342.
28. Gayer G, Rozenman J, Hoffmann C, et al. CT diagnosis of malpositioned chest tubes. Br J Radiol 2000;73:786–790.
29. Wagner RB, Crawford WO, Schimpf PP. Classification of parenchymal injuries of the lung. Radiology 1988;167:77–82.
30. Lowe LH, Bulas DI, Eichelberger MD, et al. Traumatic aortic injuries in children: radiologic evaluation. AJR am J Roentgenol 1998;170:39–42.
31. Spouge AR, Burrows PE, Armstrong D, et al. Traumatic aortic rupture in the pediatric population. Role of plain film, CT and angiography in the diagnosis. Pediatr Radiol 1991;21:324–328.
32. Cohen AM, Crass JR. Traumatic aortic injuries: current concepts. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 1993;14:71–84.
33. Cohen AM, Crass JR, Thomas HA, et al. CT evidence for the “osseous pinch” mechanism of traumatic aortic injury. AJR am J Roentgenol 1992;159:271–274.
34. Crass JR, Cohen AM, Motta AO, et al. A proposed new mechanism of traumatic aortic rupture: the osseous pinch. Radiology 1990;176:645–649.
35. Eddy AC, Rusch VW, Flinger CL, et al. The epidemiology of traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta in children: a 13-year review. J Trauma 1990;30:989–992.
36. Raptopoulos V, Sheiman RG, Phillips DA, et al. Traumatic aortic tear: screening with chest CT. Radiology 1992;182:667–673.
37. Richardson P, Mirvis SE, Scorpio R, et al. Value of CT in determining the need for angiography when findings of mediastinal hemorrhage on chest radiographs are equivocal. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991;156:273–279.
38. Dennis LN, Rogers LF. Superior mediastinal widening from spine fractures mimicking aortic rupture on chest radiographs. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989;152:27–30.
39. Van Hise ML, Primack SL, Israel RS, et al. CT in blunt chest trauma: indications and limitations. Radiographics 1998;18:1071–1084.
40. Fishman JE, Nunez D Jr, Kane A, et al. Direct versus indirect signs of traumatic aortic injury revealed by helical CT: performance characteristics and interobserver agreement. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;172:1027–1031.
41. Gavant ML, Flick P, Menke P, et al. CT aortography of thoracic aortic rupture. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;166:955–961.
42. Gavant ML, Menke PG, Fabian T, et al. Blunt traumatic aortic rupture: detection with helical CT of the chest. Radiology 1995;197:125–133.
43. Marotta R, Franchetto AA. The CT appearance of aortic transection. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;166:647–651.
44. Goldstein L, Mirvis SE, Kostrubiak IS, et al. CT diagnosis of acute pericardial tamponade after blunt chest trauma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989;152:739–741.
P.455

45. Stern EJ, Frank MS. Acute traumatic hemopericardium. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;162:1305–1306.
46. Hancock BJ, Wiseman NE. Tracheobronchial injuries in children. J Pediatr Surg 1991;26:1316–1319.
47. Palder SB, Shandling B, Manson D. Rupture of the thoracic trachea following blunt trauma: diagnosis by CAT scan. J Pediatr Surg 1991;26:1320–1322.
48. Weir IH, Muller NL, Connell DG. CT diagnosis of bronchial rupture. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1988;12:1035–1036.
49. White CS, Templeton PA, Attar S. Esophageal perforation: CT findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993;160:767–770.
50. Killeen KL, Mirvis SE, Shanmuganathan K. Helical CT of diaphragmatic rupture caused by blunt trauma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;173:1611–1616.
51. Murray JG, Caoili E, Gruden JF, et al. Acute rupture of the diaphragm due to blunt trauma: diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;166:1035–1039.
52. Worthy SA, Kang EY, Hartman TE, et al. Diaphragmatic rupture: CT findings in 11 patients. Radiology 1985;194:885–888.
53. Catasca JV, Siegel MJ. Posttraumatic diaphragmatic herniation: CT findings in two children. Pediatr Radiol 1995;25:262–264.
54. Holland DG, Quint LE. Traumatic rupture of the diaphragm without visceral herniation: CT diagnosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991;157:17–18.
55. Leung JC, Nance ML, Schwab CW, et al. Thickening of the diaphragm: a new computed tomography sign of diaphragm injury. J Thorac Imaging 1999;14:126–129.
56. Brink JA, Heiken JP, Semekovich J, et al. Abnormalities of the diaphragm and adjacent structures: findings on multiplanar spiral CT scans. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;163:307–310.
57. Israel RS, Mayberry JC, Primack SL. Diaphragmatic rupture: use of helical CT scanning with multiplanar reformations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;167:1201–1203.
58. Neish AS, Taylor GA, Lund DP, et al. Effect of CT information on the diagnosis and management of acute abdominal injury in children. Radiology 1998;206:327–331.
59. Ruess L, Sivit CJ, Eichelberger MR, et al. Blunt abdominal trauma in children: impact of CT on operative and nonoperative management. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;169:1011–1014.
60. Liu M, Lee CH, P'eng PK. Prospective comparison of diagnostic peritoneal lavage, computed tomographic scanning, and ultrasonography for the diagnosis of blunt abdominal injury. J Trauma 1993;35:267–270.
61. Benya EC, Lim-Dunham JE, Landrum O, et al. Abdominal sonography in examination of children with blunt abdominal trauma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:1613–1616.
62. Brown MA, Casola G, Sirlin CB, et al. Blunt abdominal trauma: screening US in 2,693 patients. Radiology 2001;218:352–358.
63. Kennedy C, Kempf J. FAST exams in pediatric abdominal trauma. Acad Emerg Med 2002;9:519.
64. McGahan JP, Richards J, Gillen M. The focused abdominal sonography for trauma scan: pearls and pitfalls. J Ultrasound Med 2002:789–800.
65. Miller MT, Pasquale MD, Bromberg WJ, et al. Not so FAST. J Trauma 2003;54:52–59.
66. Jeffrey RB Jr, Cardoza JD, Olcott EW. Detection of active intraabdominal arterial hemorrhage: value of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991;156:725–729.
67. Shanmuganathan K, Mirvis SE, Sover ER. Value of contrast-enhanced CT in detecting active hemorrhage in patients with blunt abdominal or pelvic trauma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993;161:65–69.
68. Lim-Dunham JE, Narra J, Benya EC, et al. Aspiration after administration of oral contrast material in children undergoing abdominal CT for trauma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;169:1015–101.
69. Allen TL, Mueller MT, Bonk R, et al. Computed tomographic scanning without oral contrast solution for blunt bowel and mesenteric injuries in abdominal trauma. J Trauma 2004;56:314–322.
70. Clancy TV, Ragozzino MW, Ramshaw K, et al. Oral contrast is not necessary in the evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma by computed tomography. Am J Surg 1993;166:68–685.
71. Shreve WS, Knotts FB, Siders RW, et al. Retrospective analysis of the adequacy of oral contrast material for computed tomography scans in trauma patients. Am J Surg 1999;178:14–17.
72. Stuhlfaut JW, Soto JA, Lucey BC, et al. Blunt abdominal trauma: performance of CT without oral contrast material Radiology 2004;233:689–694.
73. Holmes JF, Brant WE, Bogren HG, et al. Prevalence and importance of pneumothoraces visualized on abdominal computed tomographic scan in children with blunt trauma. J Trauma 2001;50:516–520.
74. Sivit CJ, Taylor GA, Bulas DI, et al. Blunt trauma in children: significance of peritoneal fluid. Radiology 1991;178:185–188.
75. Federle MP, Jeffrey RB Jr. Hemoperitoneum studied by computed tomography. Radiology 1983;148:187–192.
76. Orwig D, Federle MP. Localized clotted blood as evidence of visceral trauma on CT: the sentinel clot sign. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989;153:757–749.
77. Sivit CJ, Paclet MH, Taylor GA. Life-threatening intraperitoneal bleeding: demonstration with CT. Radiology 1989;171:430.
78. Taylor GA, Kaufman RA, Sivit CJ. Active hemorrhage in children after thoracoabdominal trauma: clinical and CT features. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;162:401–404.
79. Whitten C, Grimes C, Isler R, et al. CT of an actively-hemorrhaging liver laceration in a 9-year-old child. Pediatr Radiol 1990;20:558–559.
80. Jeffrey RB Jr, Federle MP. The collapsed inferior vena cava: CT evidence of hypovolemia. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988;150:431–432.
81. Sivit CJ, Taylor GA, Bulas DI, et al. Posttraumatic shock in children: CT findings associated with hemodynamic instability. Radiology 1992;182:7;723–726.
82. Taylor GA, Fallat ME, Eichelberger MR. Hypovolemic shock in children: abdominal CT manifestations. Radiology 1987;164:479–481.
83. Taylor GA, O'Donnell R, Sivit CJ, et al. Abdominal injury score: a clinical score for the assignment of risk in children after blunt trauma. Radiology 1994;190:689–694.
84. Stalker HP, Kaufman RA, Towbin R. Patterns of liver injury in childhood: CT analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1986;147:1199–1205.
85. Moore EE, Cogbill TH, Jurkovich GJ, et al. Organ injury scaling: spleen and liver (1994 revision). J Trauma 1995;38:323–324.
86. Shanmuganathan K, Mirvis SE. CT scan evaluation of blunt hepatic trauma. Radiol Clin North Am 1998;36:399–411.
87. Abramson SJ, Berdon WE, Kaufman RA, et al. Hepatic parenchymal and subcapsular gas after hepatic laceration caused by blunt abdominal trauma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989;153:1031–1032.
88. Panicek DM, Paquet DJ, Clark KG, et al. Hepatic parenchymal gas after blunt trauma. Radiology 1986;159:343–344.
89. Patrick LE, Ball TI, Atkinson GO, et al. Pediatric blunt abdominal trauma: periportal tracking at CT. Radiology 1992;183:698–691.
90. Shanmuganathan K, Mirvis SE, Amoroso M. Periportal low density on CT in patients with blunt trauma: association with elevated venous pressure. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993;160:279–283.
91. Siegel MJ, Herman TE. Periportal low attenuation at CT in childhood. Radiology 1992;183:685–688.
92. Sivit CJ, Taylor GA, Eichelberger MR, et al. Significance of periportal low-attenuation zones following blunt trauma in children. Pediatr Radiol 1993;23:388–390.
93. Foley WD, Cates JD, Kellman GM, et al. Treatment of blunt hepatic injuries: role of CT. Radiology 1987;164:635–638.
94. Savolaine ER, Grecos GP, Howard J, et al. Evolution of CT findings in hepatic hematoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1985;9:1090–1096.
P.456

95. MacGillivray DC, Valentine RJ. Nonoperative management of blunt pediatric liver injury–late complications: case report. J Trauma 1989;29:251–254.
96. Gross M, Lynch F, Canty T, et al. Management of pediatric liver injuries: a 13-year experience at a pediatric trauma center. J Pediatr Surg 1999;34:811–817.
97. Chen X, Talner LB, Jurkovich GJ. Gallbladder avulsion due to blunt trauma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;177:822.
98. Wittenberg A, Minotti AJ. CT diagnosis of traumatic gallbladder injury. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;185:1573–1574.
99. Do HM, Cronan JJ. CT appearance of splenic injuries managed nonoperatively. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991;157:757.
100. Pranikoff T, Hirschl RB, Schlesinger AE, et al. Resolution of splenic injury after nonoperative management. J Pediatr Surg 1994;29:1366–1369.
101. Goodman LR, Aprahamian C. Changes in splenic size after abdominal trauma. Radiology 1990;176:629–632.
102. Pappas D, Mirvis SE, Crepps JT. Splenic trauma: false-negative CT diagnosis in cases of delayed rupture. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987;149:727–728.
103. Donnelly LF, Foss JN, Frush DP, et al. Heterogeneous splenic enhancement patterns on spiral CT images in children: minimizing misinterpretation. Radiology 1999;210:493–497.
104. Berland LL, VanDyke JA. Decreased splenic enhancement on CT in traumatized hypotensive patients. Radiology 1985;156:469–471.
105. Fleisher G. Prospective evaluation of selective criteria for imaging among children with suspected blunt renal trauma. Pediatr Emerg Care 1989;5:8–11.
106. Stalker HP, Kaufman RA, Stedje K. The significance of hematuria in children after blunt abdominal trauma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990;154:569–571.
107. Taylor GA, Eichelberger MR, Potter BM. Hematuria. A marker of abdominal injury in children after blunt trauma. Ann Surg 1988;209:688–693.
108. Pollack HM, Wein AJ. Imaging of renal trauma. Radiology 1989;172:297–308.
109. Federle MP. Renal trauma. In: Pollack HM, McClennan BL, eds. Clinical Urography. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2000:1772–1784.
110. Harris AC, Zwirewich CV, Lyburn ID, et al. CT findings in blunt renal trauma. Radiographics 2001;21(spec no.) S201–214.
111. Park SJ, Kim JK, Kim KW, et al. MDCT findings or renal trauma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:541–547.
112. Kawashima A, Sandler CM, Corl FM, et al. Imaging of renal trauma: a comprehensive review. Radiographics 2001;21:557–574.
113. Kawashima A, Sandler CM, Corl FM, et al. Imaging evaluation of posttraumatic renal injuries. Abdom Imaging 2002;27:199–213.
114. Chowdhary SK, Pimpalwar A, Narasimhan KL, et al. Blunt injury of the abdomen: a plea for CT. Pediatr Radiol 2000;30:798–800.
115. Lupetin AR, Mainwaring BL, Daffner RH. CT diagnosis of renal artery injury caused by blunt abdominal trauma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989;153:1065–106.
116. Nunez D Jr, Becerra JL, Fuentes D, et al. Traumatic occlusion of the renal artery: helical CT diagnosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;167:777–780.
117. Mukherji SK, Siegel MJ. Rhabdomyolysis and renal failure in child abuse. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987;148:1203–1204.
118. Yale-Loehr AJ, Kramer SS, Quinlan DM, et al. CT of severe renal trauma in children: evaluation and course of healing with conservative therapy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989;152:109–113.
119. Kawashima A, Sandler CM, Corriere JN Jr, et al. Ureteropelvic junction injuries secondary to blunt abdominal trauma. Radiology 1997;205:487–492.
120. Kenney PJ, Panicek DM, Witanowski LS. Computed tomography of ureteral disruption. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1987;11:480–484.
121. Sebastia MC, Rodriguez-Dobao M, Quiroga S, et al. Renal trauma in occult ureteropelvic junction obstruction: CT findings. Eur Radiol 1999;9:611–615.
122. Siegel MJ, Balfe DM. Blunt renal and ureteral trauma in childhood: CT patterns of fluid collections. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989;152:1043–1047.
123. Townsend M, DeFalco AJ. Absence of ureteral opacification below ureteral disruption: a sentinel CT finding. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995;164:253–254.
124. Kane NM, Francis IR, Ellis JH. The value of CT in the detection of bladder and posterior urethral injuries. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989;153:1243–1246.
125. Lis LE, Cohen AJ. CT cystography in the evaluation of bladder trauma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1990;14:386–389.
126. Sandler CM, Dunnick NR. Bladder trauma. In: Pollack HM, McClennan BL, eds. Clinical Urography. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2000:1799–1818.
127. Vaccaro JP, Brody JM. CT Cystography in the evaluation of major bladder trauma. Radiographics 2000:20:1373–1381.
128. Sivit CJ, Cutting JP, Eichelberger MR. CT diagnosis and localization of rupture of the bladder in children with blunt abdominal trauma: significance of contrast material extravasation in the pelvis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995;164:1243–1246.
129. Auh YH, Rubenstein WA, Markisz JA, et al. Intraperitoneal paravesical spaces: CT delineation with US correlation. Radiology 1986;159:311–317.
130. Corriere JN, Sandler CM. Mechanisms of injury, patterns of extravasation and management of extraperitoneal bladder rupture due to blunt trauma. J Urol 1987;139:43–44.
131. Sivit CJ, Ingram JD, Taylor GA, et al. Posttraumatic adrenal hemorrhage in children: CT findings in 34 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992;158:1299–1302.
132. Sivit CJ, Eichelberger MR, Taylor GA, et al. Blunt pancreatic trauma in children: CT diagnosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992;158:1097–1100.
133. Dodds WJ, Taylor AJ, Erickson SJ, et al. Traumatic fracture of the pancreas: CT characteristics. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1990;14:375–378.
134. Gross JA, Vaughan MM, Johnston BD, et al. Handlebar injury causing pancreatic contusion in a pediatric patient. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:222–223.
135. Siegel MJ, Sivit CJ. Pancreatic emergencies. Radiol Clin North Am 1997;35:815–830.
136. Gupta A, Stuhlfaut JW, Fleming KW, et al. Blunt trauma of the pancreas and biliary tract: a multimodality imaging approach to diagnosis. Radiographics 2004;24:1381–1395.
137. Wong Y-C, Wang L-J, Lin B-C, et al. CT grading of blunt pancreatic injuries: prediction of ductal disruption and surgical correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997;21:246–250.
138. Lane MJ, Mindelzun RE, Sandhu JS, et al. CT diagnosis of blunt pancreatic trauma: importance of detecting fluid between the pancreas and the splenic vein. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;163:833–835.
139. Sivit CJ, Eichelberger MR. CT diagnosis of pancreatic injury in children: significance of fluid separating the splenic vein and the pancreas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995;165:921–924.
140. Moore EE, Cogbill TH, Malangoni MA, et al. Organ injury scaling: pancreas, duodenum, small bowel, colon, and rectum. J Trauma 1990;30:1427–1429.
141. Cook DE, Walsh JW, Vick CW, et al. Upper abdominal trauma: pitfalls in CT diagnosis. Radiology 1996;159:65–66.
142. Sinclair MC, Moore TC, Asch MJ, et al. Injury to hollow abdominal viscera from blunt trauma in children and adolescents. Am J Surg 1974;128:693–698.
143. Strouse PJ, Close BJ, Marshall KW, et al. CT of bowel and mesenteric trauma in children. Radiographics 1999;19:1237–1250.
144. Breen DJ, Janzen DL, Zwirewich CV, et al. Blunt bowel and mesenteric injury: diagnostic performance of CT signs. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997;21:706–712.
145. Brofman N, Atri M, Epid D, et al. Evaluation of bowel and mesenteric blunt trauma with multidetector CT. Radiographics 2006;26:1119–1131.
P.457

146. Bulas DI, Taylor GA, Eichelberger MR. The value of CT in detecting bowel perforation in children after blunt abdominal trauma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989;153:561–564.
147. Butela. ST, Federle, MP, Chang PJ, et al. Performance of CT in detection of bowel injury. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;176: 129–135.
148. Cox TD, Kuhn JP. CT scan of bowel trauma in the pediatric patient. Radiol Clin North Am 1996;34:807–818.
149. Jamieson DH, Babyn PS, Pearl R. Imaging gastrointestinal perforation in pediatric blunt abdominal trauma. Pediatr Radiol 1996;26:188–194.
150. Kunin JR, Korobkin M, Ellis JH, et al. Duodenal injuries caused by blunt abdominal trauma: value of CT in differentiating perforation from hematoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993;160:1221–1223.
151. Sivit CJ, Eichelberger MR, Taylor GA. CT in children with rupture of the bowel caused by blunt trauma: diagnostic efficacy and comparison with hypoperfusion complex. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;163:1195–1198.
152. Hara H, Babyn PS, Bourgeois D. Significance of bowel wall enhancement on CT following blunt abdominal trauma in childhood. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1992;16:94–98.
153. Levine CD, Patel UJ, Wachsberg RH, et al. CT in patients with blunt abdominal trauma: clinical significance of intraperitoneal fluid detected on a scan with otherwise normal findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995;164: 1381–1385.
154. Shalaby-Rana E, Eichelberger M, Kerzner B, et al. Intestinal stricture due to lap-belt injury. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992;158:63–64.
очистка водоемов там