![]() |
Figure 6.1.
Hepatic segmental anatomy viewed in the transaxial plane. The
transverse scissura, described by the left and right portal vein
branches, separates the cranially located segments (II, VII, and VIII)
from the caudally located segments (III, VI, and V). FL, falciform
ligament; FLT, fissure for the ligamentum teres; FLV, fissure for the
ligamentum venosum; GB, gallbladder; ILF, interlobar fissure; IVC,
inferior vena cava; LHV, left hepatic vein; LPV, left portal vein; MHV,
main hepatic vein; PV, portal vein; RHV, right hepatic vein; RPV, right
port vein (A, anterior branch; P, posterior branch); U, umbilical
segment. (Reprinted from Heiken JP, Menias CO. Liver. In: Lee JKT, Sagel SS, Stanley RJ, et al., eds. Computed Body Tomography with MRI Correlation. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006:829–931, with permission. ) |
![]() |
Figure 6.2. Hepatic segmental and venous anatomy, CT demonstration. Axial images A–E. A, B: The three main hepatic veins (arrows) lie between hepatic segments. They course caudally and medially to enter the intrahepatic portion of the vena cava (C). C:
At a more caudal level, the union of the right (RPV) and left portal
(LPV) veins forms a transverse scissura, dividing the liver into
superior and inferior divisions. Curved arrow, left lateral segment of left portal vein; arrowhead, fissure for ligamentum venosum. D, E: The right portal vein divides into anterior (ARPV) and posterior (PRPV) branches. Open arrow, fissure for ligamentum teres; white arrow, interlobar fissure. The hepatic segments are numbered according to the Couinaud system modified by Bismuth. |
![]() |
Figure 6.3. Variants of normal anatomy. A: Agenesis of the left hepatic lobe. Only the right and middle hepatic veins (arrows) are seen. B: Riedel lobe. Caudal extension of the right hepatic lobe (arrow) is noted. |
![]() |
Figure 6.4. Phases of hepatic contrast enhancement (time–enhancement curve). The vascular phase (1)
reflects the injection of intravenous contrast medium into the central
blood pool and is characterized by a rapid rise in aortic enhancement
that reaches a peak shortly after the end of the contrast agent
injection. Hepatic enhancement increases slowly during this phase.
During the redistribution phase (2), there is a
rapid decrease in aortic enhancement and a concomitant increase in
hepatic enhancement. During the equilibrium phase (3), aortic and hepatic enhancement show a slow parallel decline. (Reprinted from Heiken JP, Menias CO. Liver. In: Lee JKT, Sagel SS, Stanley RJ, et al., eds. Computed Body Tomography with MRI Correlation. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006:829–931, with permission. ) |
![]() |
Figure 6.5. Hemangioendothelioma, hypervascular tumor. A: CT image acquired during the arterial dominant phase of contrast enhancement demonstrates multiple enhancing masses. B: In the portal venous phases, almost all of the lesions are isoattenuating and are difficult to recognize. |
![]() |
Figure 6.6. Hepatoblastoma, hypovascular tumor. A: During the hepatic arterial phase, the tumor (arrows) is nearly isoattenuating to surrounding parenchyma. B: During the portal venous phase, the lesion (arrows) is hypoattenuating and can be more easily recognized. |
![]() |
Figure 6.7.
Hepatoblastoma. Nonenhanced scan in a 2-year-old girl with a palpable
abdominal mass shows a large, low-attenuation mass with calcifications
in segments II and IV. A smaller lesion is seen in segment VII. |
![]() |
Figure 6.8. Hepatoblastoma. A: Arterial phase scanning shows two well-defined hyperattenuating tumors (arrows). The posterior one shows a mosaic enhancement pattern. B: On the late portal venous phase, the masses have become hypoattenuating. Note surrounding hyperdense capsules (arrows). |
![]() |
Figure 6.9. Hepatoblastoma. A:
Hepatic arterial phase CT shows a large, heterogeneously enhancing
mass. Internal septations give the mass a mosaic appearance. B: The portal venous phase image shows a hypoattenuating, heterogeneous mass. C: Axial maximum-intensity projection demonstrates the large feeding hepatic artery (arrows). |
![]() |
Figure 6.10.
Diffuse hepatoblastoma with vascular invasion. Portal venous phase
image shows multiple hypoattenuating tumor nodules throughout the liver
and tumor thrombus filling the inferior vena cava (arrow). Note also right pleural effusion and pulmonary metastases. |
![]() |
Figure 6.11. Hepatocellular carcinoma. A:
Hepatic arterial phase image shows a heterogeneous mass with some
hyperattenuating areas in the right hepatic lobe. Enhancing vessels are
noted within and at the periphery of the lesion (arrows). B:
Portal venous phase more clearly demonstrates the margins of the tumor
and the parenchymal heterogeneity. The tumor has a large area of
central necrosis. |
![]() |
Figure 6.12. Fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma. A: Late hepatic arterial phase scan shows a large heterogeneously enhancing mass in the left hepatic lobe. Note the central scar (arrow). B: In the portal venous phase, the tumor becomes isoattenuating with the liver. Again note the central hypoattenuating scar (arrow). |
![]() |
Figure 6.13.
Malignant mesenchymal hamartoma. Portal venous phase CT shows a
predominantly cystic mass that contains some solid elements in the
periphery. |
![]() |
Figure 6.14. Angiosarcoma. Coronal contrast-enhanced CT shows a large mass in the right hepatic lobe with ccntral enhance nodules. |
![]() |
Figure 6.15. Metastases. A: Lymphoma. Portal venous phase CT scan shows multiple hypoattenuating lesions in the right and left hepatic lobes. B:
Metastatic neuroblastoma. Portal venous phase CT shows diffuse
parenchymal replacement by multiple hypoattenuating masses. The primary
ipsilateral tumor (arrows) arises in the left adrenal gland. |
![]() |
Figure 6.16. Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder. Portal venous CT scan shows several well-defined hypoattenuating lesions. |
![]() |
Figure 6.17.
Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder. Portal venous phase CT
image demonstrates diffuse replacement of hepatic parenchyma by
lymphoproliferative disorder. |
![]() |
Figure 6.18.
Hemangioendothelioma with calcification. Precontrast CT image shows a
hypoattenuating mass with peripheral and central calcifications. |
![]() |
Figure 6.19. Hemangioendotheliomas. A: Hepatic arterial phase image shows peripheral enhancement in multiple lesions. B: Coronal multiplanar reformatted image shows the hepatic arterial supply (arrow) to one of the larger lesions in the right hepatic lobe. C: Portal venous image shows complete enhancement of the lesions. |
![]() |
Figure 6.20. Small hemangioendothelioma. Hepatic arterial phase scan demonstrates multiple small lesions (arrows) with nearly complete early fill-in at 15 seconds after start of contrast administration. |
![]() |
Figure 6.21.
Giant hemangioendothelioma. Hepatic arterial phase CT scan shows a
large mass in the right hepatic lobe. Note the characteristic
peripheral enhancement, which allows a diagnosis of a vascular lesion.
The central hypoattenuating area did not fill in on delayed scans,
likely representing necrosis or scar. |
![]() |
Figure 6.22. Hemangioma. A:
Arterial phase CT demonstrates peripheral nodular enhancement. Note the
attenuation is equivalent to that of the blood in the aorta. B:
Portal venous phase scan shows near complete enhancement of the lesion.
The attenuation is now similar to that of hepatic veins. |
![]() |
Figure 6.23. Arteriovenous malformations. A:
Portal vein to hepatic vein fistula. Hepatic arterial phase image in a
neonate with congestive heart failure shows simultaneous filling of the
portal vein (open arrow) and hepatic vein (black arrow). B: Portal vein (arrow) to inferior vena cava (C) fistula. C, D: Hepatic artery (HA) to portal vein (PV) fistula. (See color insert.) |
![]() |
Figure 6.24.
Mesenchymal hamartoma. Portal venous phase CT scan shows a
well-circumscribed, thin-walled, near-water-attenuation mass containing
soft tissue septations. |
![]() |
Figure 6.25.
Focal nodular hyperplasia. Hepatic arterial phase CT scan shows marked
homogeneous enhancement of a subcapsular mass, which contains a thin,
hypoattenuating central scar (arrow). |
![]() |
Figure 6.26. Hepatocellular adenoma. A:
Precontrast CT scan demonstrates a heterogeneous mass. Areas of
hypoattenuation and hyperattenuation represent lipid material (L) and
hemorrhage (H), respectively. B: Early portal venous phase scan shows moderate enhancement (arrow) of the peripheral solid part of the mass. The lipid material and hemorrhagic area do not enhance. C: Portal venous phase scan in another patient demonstrates a moderately enhancing heterogeneous mass (arrow).
The lipid portion of the mass does not enhance. Note that the degree of
enhancement is less than that of focal nodular hyperplasia. |
![]() |
Figure 6.27. Simple cyst. CT shows a sharply defined, homogeneous, water-attenuation mass without a perceptible wall. |
![]() |
Figure 6.28. Byler disease. Several well-circumscribed, near-water-attenuation cysts are present in the right lobe of the liver. |
![]() |
Figure 6.29. Pyogenic hepatic abscess. A: Contrast-enhanced CT scan shows low-attenuation mass with a thin enhancing rim in the right hepatic lobe. B: CT scan in another patient shows a large multilocular mass containing multiple small abscesses. |
![]() |
Figure 6.30.
Gas-containing pyogenic abscess. A well-circumscribed mass with an
air–fluid level and enhancing wall is noted in the dome of the liver.
Also noted is a right pleural effusion (E). |
![]() |
Figure 6.31. Cat-scratch disease. Contrast-enhanced CT scans shows numerous low-attenuation lesions (arrows) throughout the liver that were due to Bartonella henselae infection. |
![]() |
Figure 6.32.
Amebic abscess. Contrast-enhanced CT shows a large low-attenuation mass
(M) with an enhancing wall and surrounding hypoattenuating rim of edema
(arrowhead). |
![]() |
Figure 6.33. Fungal microabscesses. Multiple low-attenuation lesions are present in the right hepatic lobe. Blood culture was positive for Candida albicans. |
![]() |
Figure 6.34.
Hydatid abscess. Contrast-enhanced CT demonstrates a large cyst (C)
(the mother cyst) with thin, enhancing walls in the right hepatic lobe.
Smaller daughter cysts (arrows) surround the mother cyst. Serologic cultures were positive for Echinococcus granulosus infection. |
![]() |
Figure 6.35.
Hydatid abscess. Contrast-enhanced CT scan shows a well-circumscribed
mass with marked peripheral and internal calcifications, consistent
with the healing process. |
![]() |
Figure 6.36.
Diffuse steatosis. Unenhanced CT demonstrates markedly decreased
attenuation of the liver, compared with that of the spleen. The
intrahepatic vessels stand out as high-attenuation structures against
the low-attenuation background. |
![]() |
Figure 6.37.
Multifocal hepatic steatosis. Unenhanced CT demonstrates patchy
hypoattenuating areas in the right lobe of the liver. Opposed phase
magnetic resonance imaging confirmed the presence of steatosis. |
![]() |
Figure 6.38.
Hemochromatosis. The attenuation value of the liver is markedly higher
than that of the spleen on this unenhanced CT in an adolescent girl who
had multiple transfusions for sickle cell anemia. |
![]() |
Figure 6.39.
Hepatocellular carcinoma associated with glycogen storage disease.
Multiple relatively hyperattenuating masses stand out against the
background of diffuse steatosis. |
![]() |
Figure 6.40. Acute hepatitis. Contrast-enhanced CT shows mild steatosis, gallbladder wall thickening (arrows), and ascites. |
![]() |
Figure 6.41.
Cirrhosis. Contrast-enhanced CT shows a small nodular liver (L) with
atrophy of the medial (M) segment of the left hepatic lobe and
hypertrophy of the caudate (C) lobe. Note also an enlarged spleen with
a peripheral infarction (arrows), perihepatic ascites, and a small right pleural effusion. |
![]() |
Figure 6.42.
Regenerating nodules. Several hypoattenuating nodules are seen in the
right hepatic lobe on a portal venous phase image. Note also the
irregular contour of the liver and associated ascites (A),
characteristic of cirrhosis. |
![]() |
Figure 6.43.
Regenerating nodules, Wilson disease. Unenhanced CT scan shows
numerous, small, hyperattenuating nodules owing to the presence of
hemosiderin. The nodular contour of the liver and ascites (A) support
the diagnosis of cirrhosis. |
![]() |
Figure 6.44. Portal hypertension. Diagram shows the two main types of portosystemic shunts. A:
Tributary collaterals of the portal venous system. Tributary
collaterals are vessels that normally communicate with the portal
venous system. The most common are the left gastric or coronary vein,
the short gastric veins, and the superior and inferior mesenteric
veins. B: Developed collaterals. Developed
collaterals arise from recanalization of pre-existing vessels that are
not functional tributaries of the portal venous system. The most common
are the paraumbilical vein and splenorenal and splenoretroperitoneal
vessels. (Reprinted from Freeny PC. Portal venous system. In: Freeny PC, Stevenson GW, eds. Alimentary Tract Radiology. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 1994:1566–1603, with permission. ) |
![]() |
Figure 6.45. Esophageal varices. Contrast-enhanced CT demonstrates large enhancing periesophageal collateral vessels (arrows) in a patient with portal hypertension. |
![]() |
Figure 6.46. Portosystemic collateral vessels. Contrast-enhanced CT shows a recanalized paraumbilical vein (white arrow) and a large splenic vein draining into an enlarged left renal vein (black arrow).
Note splenomegaly, dilated intrahepatic ducts, renal cysts, and ascites
in this patient who has Caroli disease and portal venous hypertension. |
![]() |
Figure 6.47. Acute portal vein thrombosis. Contrast-enhanced CT demonstrates nonenhancing thrombus (arrow) in the lumen of the main portal vein. |
![]() |
Figure 6.48. Portal vein thrombosis with cavernous transformation. Contrast-enhanced CT shows multiple small dilated collateral veins (arrow) in the porta hepatis. Ascites is secondary to portal hypertension. |
![]() |
Figure 6.49.
Acute Budd–Chiari syndrome. Contrast-enhanced CT scan shows
heterogeneous parenchymal enhancement and nonvisualization of the
hepatic veins. There is a small right pleural effusion (arrow). |
![]() |
Figure 6.50.
Passive hepatic venous congestion. Portal venous phase CT in a
14-year-old girl with pericarditis shows hepatomegaly and mosaic-like
hepatic parenchymal enhancement. Note a dilated inferior vena cava (arrow), which is attributed to reflux of contrast-enhanced blood from the right atrium, and ascites. |
![]() |
Figure 6.51. Hepatic infarction. A:
Contrast-enhanced CT shows an enlarged liver with an attenuation that
is markedly lower than that of the spleen (S). Some relatively normal
parenchyma is noted posteriorly. B: Sagittal multiplanar reformation shows the occlusion of the distal portion of the hepatic artery (arrow). The hepatic artery thrombus was a complication of a Kasai procedure for biliary atresia. (Case courtesy of Edward Lee, MD.) |
![]() |
Figure 6.52. Posttransplant complications. A: Living related donor transplant, hepatic vein stenosis. Maximum-intensity projection shows narrowing of the hepatic vein (arrow) at its junction with the inferior vena cava (C). B: Cadaveric liver transplant, bilomas. Contrast-enhanced CT scan demonstrates areas of low attenuation (arrows), representing bilomas. |
![]() |
Figure 6.53. Right lobe hepatic transplant. An irregular, hypoattenuating, nonenhancing area (arrows)
at the hepatic margin represents subcapsular hepatic necrosis. Also
noted is dystrophic calcification in the capsule of the liver,
splenomegaly, mesenteric edema, and a small right pleural effusion. |
![]() |
Figure 6.54.
Normal biliary tract anatomy. The main right and left hepatic ducts
join to form the common hepatic duct, which joins with the cystic duct
to form the common bile duct. The common bile duct courses caudally in
the hepatoduodenal ligament along with the hepatic artery and portal
vein to the level of the pancreatic head. |
![]() |
Figure 6.55. Dilated biliary ducts. A: Contrast-enhanced CT scan through the dome of the liver shows dilated intrahepatic ducts (arrows),
which appear as hypoattenuating tubular and circular structures
surrounded by enhanced portal veins. Note that the dilated ducts are
seen only on one side of the veins. B, C: CT scans at the level of the porta hepatis and pancreatic head, respectively, show a dilated common bile duct (arrow). The patient had a common bile duct stricture. |
![]() |
Figure 6.56. Obstruction owing to common bile duct stone. CT scan through the pancreatic head reveals a high-attenuation stone (arrowhead) in the distal common bile duct. |
![]() |
Figure 6.57. Rhabdomyosarcoma. Contrast-enhanced CT scan shows a large soft tissue mass (black arrows) in the porta hepatis. The tumor compressed the common bile duct, causing biliary obstruction. GB, dilated gallbladder. White arrows, dilated bile ducts. |
![]() |
Figure 6.58. Periportal edema. Contrast-enhanced CT shows hypoattenuating fluid (arrows)
circumferentially surrounding the portal vein. The periportal edema in
this trauma patient was the consequence of intravenous hydration. By
comparison, dilated ducts are present on only one side of the vein. |
![]() |
Figure 6.59. Todani's classification scheme of choledochal cysts. (Reproduced from Todani
T, Watanabe Y, Narusue M, et al. Congenital bile duct cysts:
classification, operative procedures, and review of thirty-seven cases
including cancer arising from choledochal cyst. Am J Surg 1977;134:263–269, with permission. ) See text for detailed description. |
![]() |
Figure 6.60. Choledochal cyst. Axial CT scan (A) and coronal multiplanar reformation (B) show a markedly enlarged common bile duct (C) and a separate gallbladder (GB). |
![]() |
Figure 6.61. Caroli disease. A, B:
Two axial contrast-enhanced CT scans show tubular and saccular
enlargement of numerous intrahepatic ducts. Also note a small amount of
ascites. |
![]() |
Figure 6.62. Cholelithiasis. A densely calcified calcium bilirubinate stone (arrow) is present in the dependent part of the gallbladder. The striated renal parenchyma is the result of pyelonephritis. |