Editors: Siegel, Marilyn J.
Title: Pediatric Body CT, 2nd Edition
> Table of Contents > Chapter 6 - Liver and Biliary Tract
Chapter 6
Liver and Biliary Tract
Computed tomography (CT) has been used widely to evaluate both focal and diffuse diseases of the liver in children (1,2,3). It is recognized as the imaging examination of choice for further assessing hepatic abnormalities identified on screening sonography. This chapter addresses the use of CT in children for evaluating liver and biliary tract disorders. The clinically relevant anatomy of the liver and CT techniques also are reviewed.
Anatomy
Gross Anatomy
The liver is bordered superiorly by the undersurface of the diaphragm; medially by the stomach, duodenum, right adrenal gland, and transverse colon; inferiorly by the hepatic flexure of the colon; and posteriorly by the right kidney. With the exception of the surfaces adjacent to the inferior vena cava (IVC), the gallbladder fossa and the posterosuperior aspect of the diaphragm, the liver is covered by peritoneum.
Three fissures delineate the margins of the hepatic lobes and segments (Figs. 6.1 and 6.2). The interlobar fissure, which lies on the inferior surface of the liver, is oriented along a line that passes through the middle hepatic vein superiorly and the gallbladder fossa inferiorly. It divides the liver into right and left lobes. The left intersegmental fissure (also known as the fissure for the ligamentum teres) lies along the caudal aspect of the left hepatic lobe, dividing the lobe into medial and lateral segments. The fissure for the ligament venosum, which contains the remnant of the ductus venosus, is oriented in a coronal or oblique plane, separating the posterior margin of the left lateral hepatic segment from the anterior margin of the caudate lobe.
The caudate lobe is considered anatomically distinct because it has its own arterial supply and venous drainage. It extends medially from the right hepatic lobe, insinuating itself between the portal vein and the IVC (4). The isthmus between the portal vein and vena cava is termed the caudate process. The most medial extension of the caudate lobe is termed the papillary process. The arterial supply of the caudate lobe is from both the right and left hepatic arteries, whereas the venous drainage is directly into the IVC.
Segmental Anatomy
Knowledge of the segmental anatomy of the liver is important for localization and surgical management of hepatic neoplasms. The traditional segmental nomenclature described by Goldsmith and Woodburne divided the liver into right and left lobes, with each lobe divided into two segments (5). In this system the main hepatic veins are used to define the major hepatic segments. Thus, the right and left lobes are defined by a plane passing through the middle hepatic vein and gallbladder fossa. The anterior and posterior segments of the right lobe are divided by a plane drawn through the right hepatic vein, and the medial and lateral segments of the left lobe are divided by a plane drawn through the left hepatic vein. In this traditional system, no distinction is made between superior and inferior subsegments within each major segment. However, knowledge of these hepatic subsegments is important since surgical techniques have been developed that allow resection of such subdivisions. Consequently, the system proposed by Couinaud and later modified by Bismuth has largely replaced the traditional nomenclature (6) (Table 6.1).
In the nomenclature system of Bismuth and Couinaud, the hepatic segments, except for the caudate lobe and medial segment of the left lobe, are divided not only by three vertical planes along the hepatic veins, but also by a transverse plane defined by the right and left portal vein (7,8,9,10). Thus, eight segments are defined by this system. The caudate lobe is segment I, and the other segments, II through VII, are numbered in a clockwise direction when the liver is viewed from its ventral aspect (Figs. 6.1 and 6.2; Table 6.1). Each segment has separate afferent and efferent vessels and biliary channels.
P.178

Figure 6.1. Hepatic segmental anatomy viewed in the transaxial plane. The transverse scissura, described by the left and right portal vein branches, separates the cranially located segments (II, VII, and VIII) from the caudally located segments (III, VI, and V). FL, falciform ligament; FLT, fissure for the ligamentum teres; FLV, fissure for the ligamentum venosum; GB, gallbladder; ILF, interlobar fissure; IVC, inferior vena cava; LHV, left hepatic vein; LPV, left portal vein; MHV, main hepatic vein; PV, portal vein; RHV, right hepatic vein; RPV, right port vein (A, anterior branch; P, posterior branch); U, umbilical segment. (Reprinted from
Heiken JP, Menias CO. Liver. In: Lee JKT, Sagel SS, Stanley RJ, et al., eds. Computed Body Tomography with MRI Correlation. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006:829–931, with permission.
)
Vascular Anatomy
The portal veins and hepatic arteries are the afferent vessels of the liver (Figs. 6.1 and 6.2). The portal vein arises ventral to the neck of the pancreas at the junction of the splenic and superior mesenteric veins. It courses cephalad and to the right, posterior to the bile ducts and hepatic artery within the hepatoduodenal ligament, to enter the porta hepatis. Within the porta hepatis, the portal vein divides into right and left branches that run parallel to the bile ducts and right and left hepatic arteries. After giving off several branches that supply the porta hepatis and caudate lobe, the right portal vein courses to the right and cranially. Within the parenchyma of the right lobe, the right portal vein divides into anterior and posterior branches that supply their respective segments. Each of these branches then divides into superior and inferior branches that supply their corresponding hepatic segments. The first portion of the left portal vein courses horizontally, giving off a branch to the lateral segment (segments II and III). The left portal vein then turns medially to join the obliterated umbilical vein within the fissure for the ligamentum teres. This intrafissural portion (umbilical segment) of the left portal vein divides into ascending and descending branches that supply the superior and inferior divisions of segment IV.
Table 6.1 Bismuth System of Segments
Lobe Bismuth Segments
Caudate I
Left lateral superior subsegment II
Left lateral inferior subsegment III
Left medial subsegment IVa, IVba
Right anterior inferior subsegment V
Right anterior superior subsegment VIII
Right posterior inferior subsegment VI
Right posterior superior subsegment VII
aThe difference in the Couinaud and Bismuth classifications is that the Couinaud classification does not subdivide segment IV into two subsegments.
The common hepatic artery usually arises from the celiac axis and courses anteriorly and to the right, giving off right gastric and gastroduodenal branches. It then continues as the proper hepatic artery. At the level of the porta hepatis, the hepatic artery lies anterior to the portal vein and medial to the bile duct. Within the porta hepatis, the hepatic artery divides into right and left branches. This usual pattern of hepatic arterial anatomy is present in slightly more than 50% of individuals; the remaining population has varying arterial anatomy (11). The common variations are origin of the left hepatic artery from the left gastric artery and origin of the right hepatic artery branches from either the celiac axis or the superior mesenteric artery. Within the liver, the right and left hepatic artery branches divide in a pattern similar to that of the portal vein branches to supply their respective segments.
The hepatic veins are the efferent vessels of the liver (12). The three major hepatic veins drain into the IVC just below the diaphragm (Figs. 6.1 and 6.2). The right hepatic vein, running between the anterior and posterior segments of the right lobe, drains segments V, VI, and VII. The middle hepatic vein, running in the interlobar fissure, drains segments IV, V, and VIII. The left hepatic vein, lying in the fissure between the medial and lateral segments of the left lobe, drains segments II and III. The middle and left hepatic veins often form a common trunk before emptying into the IVC.
Hepatic Parenchyma
The attenuation value of unenhanced hepatic parenchyma usually is in the range of 40 to 65 Hounsfield units (HU) and is slightly higher than that of the spleen (mean difference of 8 HU) (13). After administration of intravenous contrast medium, the attenuation value of the liver is
P.179

P.180

usually less than that of the spleen (Fig. 6.2). On precontrast scans, the portal and hepatic veins appear as low-density, branching, linear, or rounded structures within the hepatic parenchyma. The inherent attenuation difference between blood and hepatic parenchyma is accentuated in the presence of anemia or iron overload. Reversal of the attenuation difference between vessel and parenchyma on unenhanced scans occurs in the presence of diffuse steatosis (see below).
Figure 6.2. Hepatic segmental and venous anatomy, CT demonstration. Axial images A–E. A, B: The three main hepatic veins (arrows) lie between hepatic segments. They course caudally and medially to enter the intrahepatic portion of the vena cava (C). C: At a more caudal level, the union of the right (RPV) and left portal (LPV) veins forms a transverse scissura, dividing the liver into superior and inferior divisions. Curved arrow, left lateral segment of left portal vein; arrowhead, fissure for ligamentum venosum. D, E: The right portal vein divides into anterior (ARPV) and posterior (PRPV) branches. Open arrow, fissure for ligamentum teres; white arrow, interlobar fissure. The hepatic segments are numbered according to the Couinaud system modified by Bismuth.
Figure 6.3. Variants of normal anatomy. A: Agenesis of the left hepatic lobe. Only the right and middle hepatic veins (arrows) are seen. B: Riedel lobe. Caudal extension of the right hepatic lobe (arrow) is noted.
Anatomic Anomalies and Variants
Congenital anomalies of the liver can involve an entire lobe or only a segment of the liver. These include (a) absence (agenesis) (Fig. 6.3); (b) underdevelopment, either small size with normal architecture (hypoplasia) or small size with abnormal architecture (aplasia); and (c) overdevelopment. Underdevelopment may involve an entire lobe or only a segment (14,15,16). The most common anomaly is overdevelopment of the right lobe, referred to as Riedel lobe.
A common anatomic variant is the presence of an incomplete accessory hepatic fissure, occurring most commonly in the right lobe superiorly (17). Another common variant is leftward extension of the lateral segment of the left hepatic lobe, causing it to wrap around the spleen. Recognition of this variant is important so that it is not mistaken for a subcapsular fluid collection.
Hepatic Contrast Enhancement: Principles
Detection of hepatic lesions depends on several factors, including the contrast medium dose, the rate of contrast injection, scan timing, and the intrinsic characteristics of the lesion.
The primary purpose of administering intravascular contrast medium is to increase the difference in attenuation value between normal and abnormal hepatic parenchyma. Most hepatic lesions have attenuation values lower than that of normal parenchyma. Hepatic neoplasms usually become recognizable when the attenuation value difference between them and the surrounding hepatic parenchyma is >10 HU (13).
Phases of Contrast Enhancement
There are three phases of hepatic enhancement—vascular, redistribution, and equilibrium—reflecting different parts of the aortic-hepatic time–attenuation curve (Fig. 6.4) and the redistribution of the contrast agent from the vascular to the extravascular (interstitial) space (13). During the vascular or arterial phase, intravenous contrast agent is predominantly in the central blood compartment (aorta and hepatic artery). This phase is characterized by a rapid rise in aortic enhancement, with a peak soon after the end of the contrast
P.181

medium injection. During the redistribution phase, also known as the portal venous or hepatic parenchymal phase, contrast agent shifts from the vascular to the extravascular compartment of the liver, resulting in decreased aortic enhancement and increased hepatic enhancement. The equilibrium phase is the time period where both aortic and hepatic enhancement gradually decline as contrast agent in the liver shifts back into the central vascular compartment. The declining aortic and hepatic enhancement curves become parallel (13), and the difference between aortic and inferior vena caval attenuation values decreases to <10 HU. Hepatic lesions become indiscernible during this phase if the amount of interstitial contrast agent is similar in the lesion and in the adjacent normal parenchyma.
Figure 6.4. Phases of hepatic contrast enhancement (time–enhancement curve). The vascular phase (1) reflects the injection of intravenous contrast medium into the central blood pool and is characterized by a rapid rise in aortic enhancement that reaches a peak shortly after the end of the contrast agent injection. Hepatic enhancement increases slowly during this phase. During the redistribution phase (2), there is a rapid decrease in aortic enhancement and a concomitant increase in hepatic enhancement. During the equilibrium phase (3), aortic and hepatic enhancement show a slow parallel decline. (Reprinted from
Heiken JP, Menias CO. Liver. In: Lee JKT, Sagel SS, Stanley RJ, et al., eds. Computed Body Tomography with MRI Correlation. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006:829–931, with permission.
)
Figure 6.5. Hemangioendothelioma, hypervascular tumor. A: CT image acquired during the arterial dominant phase of contrast enhancement demonstrates multiple enhancing masses. B: In the portal venous phases, almost all of the lesions are isoattenuating and are difficult to recognize.
During the hepatic arterial phase, hypervascular tumors are maximally enhanced, appearing as hyperattenuating lesions. In the later portal venous phase, these lesions may become indiscernible as the liver parenchyma enhances maximally (Fig. 6.5). In contradistinction, hypovascular tumors may be barely visible or imperceptible during the hepatic arterial phase of enhancement because they receive relatively less blood from the hepatic artery, but they can be seen as hypoattenuating lesions during the portal venous phase of enhancement (Fig. 6.6) (18,19,20,21,22).
Magnitude of Hepatic Enhancement
The magnitude of hepatic enhancement is dependent on total iodine dose, which is based on contrast medium
P.182

volume and concentration, and the rate of injection (13,23,24). For a given injection rate, maximum hepatic enhancement increases linearly with the dose of iodine administered. The magnitude of hepatic tissue enhancement also increases with faster injection rates, but this occurs in a nonlinear fashion.
Figure 6.6. Hepatoblastoma, hypovascular tumor. A: During the hepatic arterial phase, the tumor (arrows) is nearly isoattenuating to surrounding parenchyma. B: During the portal venous phase, the lesion (arrows) is hypoattenuating and can be more easily recognized.
Timing of Hepatic Enhancement
The timing of peak hepatic arterial and venous enhancement is dependent on the injection duration. A shorter injection duration (either rapid rate or low-volume injection) results in earlier peak hepatic enhancement, whereas a longer injection duration (slow rate or high-volume injection) produces later peak hepatic enhancement (23,24). Peak hepatic arterial enhancement usually occurs within 10 seconds after the completion of the contrast medium injection, and peak hepatic parenchymal enhancement within 30 seconds (13).
Specific Imaging Techniques
Image Acquisition
Collimation and pitch will vary depending on the type of scanner used. For a 16-row detector, 0.75- to 1.5-mm collimation with a pitch of 1 to 1.5 suffices. For a 64-row detector, 0.6- to 1.25-mm collimation and a pitch of 1 to 1.5 suffice. A 5-mm section thickness and interval are usually adequate for routine viewing, with thinner reconstructions needed if multiplanar and 3D reconstructions are planned (18). (See Chapter 1.)
Noncontrast CT Scanning
CT scans without contrast medium administration are not routinely needed, but they may be helpful in selected instances. Indications for noncontrast studies include identification of calcifications or acute hemorrhage and determination of the attenuation value of a parenchymal lesion, which may be useful in its characterization.
Single-phase Hepatic CT Scanning
Single-phase contrast-enhanced CT during the peak time of parenchymal enhancement (portal venous phase) suffices for evaluation of most hepatic diseases in children (abscess, diffuse hepatic disease, venous vascular disorders). Intravenous contrast agent is administered at a dose of 2 mL/Kg (not to exceed 125 mL total). Hand injection of contrast medium is recommended if intravenous access is through a peripheral access line. With a hand injection, the contrast medium is injected as rapidly as possible. A power injector is used in children who have antecubital cannulas of 22 gauge or larger in place. The rate of contrast injection is determined by the size of the catheter (see Chapter 1). The scan delay time for hepatic imaging is 50 to 60 seconds after the start of the contrast administration.
P.183

Multiphase Hepatic CT Scanning
Multiphase imaging in both arterial and portal venous dominant phases of enhancement is warranted for detection of hypervascular tumors, characterization of a lesion seen on screening sonography, and preoperative vascular mapping in patients who are considered for hepatic resection. In a typical dual phase hepatic CT study, the arterial phase begins 15 to 25 seconds after the start of contrast injection and the portal venous phase begins 45 to 50 seconds after the start of the contrast bolus. The scan delay for arterial phase imaging also can be timed using a bolus tracking device, rather than an empirical delay, with the region of interest placed on the abdominal aorta. A threshold value of 50 to 100 HU is used to trigger the diagnostic CT study. The liver alone is scanned during the arterial phase. The entire abdomen and pelvis are imaged in the portal venous phase. The contrast agent volume and flow rate are the same as described above.
Hepatic Tumors
Hepatic tumors are the third most frequent abdominal neoplasms in children after Wilms tumor and neuroblastoma. Malignant hepatic neoplasms are twice as frequent as benign neoplasms, and most of these are hepatoblastomas and hepatocellular carcinomas (1,2,3,25,26,27,28). Rarer malignant hepatic tumors include undifferentiated (embryonal) sarcoma, fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma, and angiosarcoma. The common benign hepatic tumors are hemangioendothelioma, hemangioma, and mesenchymal hamartoma, with focal nodular hyperplasia and adenoma encountered less often (1,2,3,25,26,27,28). These tumors display distinctive distribution by age, with hemangioendothelioma seen usually in the first 6 months of life; hepatoblastoma, embryonal sarcoma, and mesenchymal hamartoma seen in the first 5 years of life; and the remainder seen in older children and adolescents.
Primary Malignant Neoplasms
Hepatoblastoma
Hepatoblastoma is the most common liver tumor in children, and 90% are seen in infants and young children under 5 years of age, with approximately two thirds presenting in the first 2 years of life (25,26,27,28). Hepatoblastoma most often presents as an asymptomatic mass. Other features include abdominal pain, anorexia, weight loss, jaundice, and precocious puberty (related to the secretion of chorionic gonadotropins). Some degree of osteopenia is present in all patients, and severe osteopenia is present in 20% to 30% of patients. Serum α-fetoprotein levels are elevated in 80% to 90% of patients with hepatoblastomas (25,26,27,28).
In approximately 5% of cases, hepatoblastoma is associated with malformations or syndromes. The most common associations are Beckwith–Wiedemann syndrome, hemihypertrophy, fetal alcohol syndrome, familial polyposis coli, Gardner syndrome, and trisomy 18 (26,27,28).
Pathologically, hepatoblastoma contains small, primitive epithelial cells, resembling fetal liver, and occasionally mesenchymal elements (26,27,28). The tumor is usually unifocal, and the right lobe of the liver is most often affected. However, multifocal disease or diffuse infiltration can occur. The tumor has no association with cirrhosis. Metastatic disease occurs in approximately 10% to 20% of patients at time of diagnosis (25,26,27,28). Metastases are chiefly to the lungs and less commonly to brain and skeleton.
Most hepatoblastomas are hypoattenuating on unenhanced scans, but some have an attenuation equal to that of normal liver parenchyma (1,2,3,29,30,31,32). Isoattenuating lesions can be identified on unenhanced images when they produce a focal bulge in the contour of the liver or when they have a low-attenuation rim, which represents the tumor capsule. Areas of tumoral necrosis or fatty tissue appear as hypoattenuating foci, whereas recent hemorrhage may cause areas of relative hyperattenuation. Calcifications are observed in approximately 40% of hepatoblastomas (Fig. 6.7) (32).
Hepatoblastoma typically shows transient hyperattenuation in the arterial phase of enhancement (Figs. 6.8 and 6.9). Smaller lesions may enhance homogeneously, whereas larger lesions tend to enhance heterogeneously. Intratu-moral septa divide the mass into hypoattenuating and hyperattenuating areas, creating a mosaic pattern, and a large feeding artery may be noted in some cases (Fig. 6.9). During the portal venous phase, hepatoblastoma becomes
P.184

P.185

hypoattenuating relative to surrounding parenchyma (Figs. 6.8B and 6.9B). A hyperattenuating tumor capsule may be noted in this phase.
Figure 6.7. Hepatoblastoma. Nonenhanced scan in a 2-year-old girl with a palpable abdominal mass shows a large, low-attenuation mass with calcifications in segments II and IV. A smaller lesion is seen in segment VII.
Figure 6.8. Hepatoblastoma. A: Arterial phase scanning shows two well-defined hyperattenuating tumors (arrows). The posterior one shows a mosaic enhancement pattern. B: On the late portal venous phase, the masses have become hypoattenuating. Note surrounding hyperdense capsules (arrows).
Figure 6.9. Hepatoblastoma. A: Hepatic arterial phase CT shows a large, heterogeneously enhancing mass. Internal septations give the mass a mosaic appearance. B: The portal venous phase image shows a hypoattenuating, heterogeneous mass. C: Axial maximum-intensity projection demonstrates the large feeding hepatic artery (arrows).
Figure 6.10. Diffuse hepatoblastoma with vascular invasion. Portal venous phase image shows multiple hypoattenuating tumor nodules throughout the liver and tumor thrombus filling the inferior vena cava (arrow). Note also right pleural effusion and pulmonary metastases.
Vascular invasion and arterioportal shunting are other findings associated with hepatoblastoma. Hepatoblas-toma may invade portal and hepatic veins and the infe-rior vena cava. Tumor thrombus appears as a hypoat-tenuating filling defect within the opacified vascular lumen (Fig. 6.10). In some instances, the thrombus may show homogeneous or heterogeneous contrast enhancement. CT features of arterioportal shunting include early or prolonged enhancement of the portal vein and tran-sient hyperenhancement of the parenchyma. Two patterns have been recognized: a wedge-shaped hyperattenu-ating area peripheral to the tumor, and early enhance-ment in a contralateral segment or lobe (33). Biliary ductal dilatation is rare, but it may be seen when there is ductal compression by tumor or less commonly direct ductal invasion.
Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Hepatocellular carcinoma is the second most common pediatric liver malignancy after hepatoblastoma. In the pediatric population, hepatocellular carcinoma has a median age of 12 years, with >65% of cases seen in children older than 10 years of age. It is rare under 5 years (25,26,27,28). Abdominal distention and right upper quadrant mass are the most common presenting features. Serum α-fetoprotein levels are elevated in ≤50% of cases (25). Pre-existing liver disease, such as hepatitis B infection, type I glycogen storage disease, tyrosinemia, familial cholestatic cirrhosis, hemochromatosis, Wilson disease, and α1-anti-trypsin deficiency, is present in approximately one half of cases (34,35).
Pathologically, hepatocellular carcinoma consists of large, pleomorphic multinucleated cells with variable degrees of differentiation. The tumor is often invasive or multifocal at the time of diagnosis.
Like hepatoblastoma, the CT appearance of hepatocellular carcinoma is variable and depends on the vascu-larity, amount of necrosis and hemorrhage, and growth pattern of the tumor. Hepatocellular carcinomas are hypoattenuating or isoattenuating to normal liver par-enchyma on precontrast images. They typically show some degree of transient hyperattenuation during the arterial phase of enhancement (Fig. 6.11) (34,35). Small lesions usually enhance homogeneously, whereas larger lesions tend to enhance heterogeneously. A thin, unenhancing rim, representing a fibrous pseudocapsule, may be seen in the arterial phase. During the portal venous phase, the tumor appears isoattenuating or hypoattenuating. In this phase, the capsule and intratumoral septa may appear hyperattenuating, creating a mosaic appearance (36,37). Both vascular invasion and arterioportal shunting may be demonstrated. Calcification is identified in about 25% of cases.
Postoperative Changes
The preferred treatment of hepatoblastoma and hepatocellular carcinoma is partial hepatectomy and chemotherapy. CT findings soon after partial hepatectomy include a small hypoattenuating area at the surgical margin, corresponding to transient accumulation of blood and bile. Later findings include shift of abdominal organs and hepatic regeneration. Perihepatic or subphrenic fluid collections not conforming to the margins of resection should raise suspicion of an abscess, biloma, hematoma, or seroma (38). Minimally invasive techniques, such as cryoablation and chemoembolization, have not been widely used for the treatment of hepatic malignancy in the pediatric population.
Fibrolamellar Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma is a histologic subtype of hepatocellular carcinoma with distinctive clinical and pathologic features (39,40,41,42,43). The tumor occurs predominantly in adolescents and young adults without underlying liver disease; the mean patient age at presentation is 23 to 28 years. Histologically, the tumor contains malignant eosinophilic-laden hepatocytes that
P.186

are separated by thin, multilamellated fibrous bands, hence the term fibrolamellar (26). Hepatomegaly and abdominal pain are common presenting features. Fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma is less aggressive than the usual variety of hepatocellular carcinoma, and affected patients have a better prognosis (26). Serum α-fetoprotein levels are usually normal.
Figure 6.11. Hepatocellular carcinoma. A: Hepatic arterial phase image shows a heterogeneous mass with some hyperattenuating areas in the right hepatic lobe. Enhancing vessels are noted within and at the periphery of the lesion (arrows). B: Portal venous phase more clearly demonstrates the margins of the tumor and the parenchymal heterogeneity. The tumor has a large area of central necrosis.
On CT, fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma usually appears as a solitary, well-circumscribed, heterogeneously enhancing mass (Fig. 6.12) (39,40,41,42,43). A central scar, which is commonly calcified, is present in >50% of patients (39,40,41,42,43,44).
Figure 6.12. Fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma. A: Late hepatic arterial phase scan shows a large heterogeneously enhancing mass in the left hepatic lobe. Note the central scar (arrow). B: In the portal venous phase, the tumor becomes isoattenuating with the liver. Again note the central hypoattenuating scar (arrow).
Undifferentiated (Embryonal) Sarcoma
Undifferentiated (embryonal) sarcoma is a highly malignant tumor of mesenchymal origin, which usually presents as abdominal pain or a mass in children 6 to
P.187

10 years of age, but it can be seen in infants and young adults (26,28). Serum α-fetoprotein levels are normal. Cut section shows a soft mass with solid, gelatinous, or cystic areas and areas of hemorrhage and necrosis. Histologically, it contains primitive stellate or spindle-shaped cells in a myxoid stroma (26,28). At CT, undifferentiated sarcoma appears as a large, well-demarcated, predominantly hypoattenuating mass containing hyperattenuating septa and peripheral solid components, which may exhibit contrast enhancement (Fig. 6.13). Less often, the mass is predominantly solid. A thin rim of soft tissue attenuation, corresponding to a fibrous pseudocapsule, may be seen in some cases (45,46).
Angiosarcoma
Primary angiosarcoma is a rare tumor arising from endothelial cells. It affects children 3 to 10 years of age (25). The pathologic appearance is that of multiple small nodules or a large mass with or without satellite nodules. On unenhanced CT, the tumor is hypoattenuating, al-though areas of recent hemorrhage may be hyperattenuating or isoattenuating (13). After intravenous contrast administration, angiosarcoma may demonstrate nodular, irregular, or ring-shaped enhancement (Fig. 6.14). The areas of enhancement are often central in location and have an attenuation lower than aorta, unlike hemangioendothelioma and hemangioma, which are isoattenuating to aorta.
Figure 6.13. Malignant mesenchymal hamartoma. Portal venous phase CT shows a predominantly cystic mass that contains some solid elements in the periphery.
Figure 6.14. Angiosarcoma. Coronal contrast-enhanced CT shows a large mass in the right hepatic lobe with ccntral enhance nodules.
Hepatic Metastases
The malignant tumors of childhood that most frequently metastasize to the liver are Wilms tumor, neuroblastoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, and lymphoma. Neuroblastoma may affect the liver in either stage IV or IV-S disease. Stage IV disease is characterized by the presence of a retroperitoneal mass and distant metastases to skeleton, liver, or nodes. Stage IV-S neuroblastoma occurs in patients under 1 year of age who have small ipsilateral tumors (not crossing the midline) and metastases to liver, skin, and bone marrow but not to cortical bone. Clinically, patients with hepatic metastases present with hepatomegaly, jaundice, abdominal pain or mass, or abnormal hepatic function tests.
Hepatic metastases are typically multiple and well circumscribed. Less commonly they are solitary or diffusely infiltrating. On precontrast images, they may be isoattenuating or hypoattenuating to liver parenchyma. Most metastases are hypovascular and appear hypoattenuating relative to liver parenchyma on portal venous phase imaging (Fig. 6.15). On arterial phase images, metastases may demonstrate peripheral rim enhancement.
Hypervascular metastases are rare in children. Such tumors include sarcomas, renal cell carcinoma, pancreatic
P.188

islet cell tumors, and thyroid cancers. Metastases from these tumors are more easily seen during arterial phase imaging when they appear hyperattenuating relative to normal parenchyma. These metastases may become isoattenuating with surrounding parenchyma during the portal venous phase and difficult to recognize.
Figure 6.15. Metastases. A: Lymphoma. Portal venous phase CT scan shows multiple hypoattenuating lesions in the right and left hepatic lobes. B: Metastatic neuroblastoma. Portal venous phase CT shows diffuse parenchymal replacement by multiple hypoattenuating masses. The primary ipsilateral tumor (arrows) arises in the left adrenal gland.
Diffuse replacement is usually secondary to stage IV-S neuroblastoma. CT shows widespread heterogeneity and innumerable hypoattenuating lesions (Fig. 6.15B). The differential diagnostic considerations for this appearance include hepatic fibrosis, cirrhosis, patchy steatosis, and diffuse infiltrating hepatoblastoma or hepatocellular carcinoma.
Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder
Involvement of the liver has been reported in ≤50% of all children with posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) (47,48,49). Three patterns of hepatic PTLD have been reported: discrete hypoattenuating nodular lesions (Fig. 6.16), poorly defined infiltrative lesions (Fig. 6.17), and periportal infiltration. This third pattern may result in biliary obstruction.
Benign Neoplasms
Benign tumors account for about one third of all primary liver tumors in children (26,27,28). These tumors can be classified by cell of origin as mesenchymal (infantile hemangioendothelioma, hemangioma, and mesenchymal hamartoma) or epithelial (focal nodular hyperplasia, adenoma, and cysts). Mesenchymal tumors are more common than epithelial tumors in children.
Infantile Hemangioendothelioma
Infantile hemangioendothelioma is the most common benign hepatic tumor of childhood (26,27,28). It is usually diagnosed (85% of cases) in the first 6 months of life,
P.189

with about one third presenting in the first month of life and virtually all by 3 years of age (27,28). Most affected patients present with congestive heart failure owing to high-output overcirculation, abdominal enlargement, or a mass. Less often, patients present with jaundice, thrombocytopenia in association with a consumptive coagulopathy (Kasabach–Merritt syndrome), or hemoperitoneum owing to tumor rupture (27,28,50). Hemangiomas at other sites, including skin, lung, retroperitoneum, and bone, occur in 10% to 15% of cases (28).
Figure 6.16. Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder. Portal venous CT scan shows several well-defined hypoattenuating lesions.
Figure 6.17. Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder. Portal venous phase CT image demonstrates diffuse replacement of hepatic parenchyma by lymphoproliferative disorder.
Histologically, two types of infantile hemangioma have been reported: Type I is composed of vascular channels lined by plump endothelial cells in a single layer that are supported by reticular fibers (50). Type II contains larger, more irregular branching spaces lined by immature pleomorphic cells. This form of the lesion has some malignant potential, and rare cases of metastases have been described (51,52). Hemangioendothelioma has little (if any) arteriovenous shunting.
Hemangioendotheliomas may be solitary or multifocal. They usually are hypoattenuating on unenhanced scans. Calcifications can be identified in about 50% of lesions (Fig. 6.18). After administration of intravenous contrast agent, they typically demonstrate nodular peripheral enhancement with progressive centripetal fill-in and rapid washout (50,53,54) (Fig. 6.19). Very small lesions may show bright uniform enhancement or fill-in very soon after contrast injection (Fig. 6.20). Large lesions may show persistent central hypoattenuation due to necrosis or scar (Fig. 6.21). If the characteristic finding of centripetal enhancement is seen, the diagnosis of a vascular lesion can be made with certainty by CT.
Figure 6.18. Hemangioendothelioma with calcification. Precontrast CT image shows a hypoattenuating mass with peripheral and central calcifications.
Since hemangioendotheliomas have a natural history of regression and involution within 12 to 18 months (55), the initial treatment of symptomatic patients with high-out congestive heart failure is medical management, including digitalis, diuretics, steroids, and interferon (56). If these methods fail, chemotherapy, irradiation, or embolic or surgical treatment may be required (57).
Cavernous Hemangiomas
Cavernous hemangiomas usually are incidental findings on imaging studies performed for other clinical indications. Histologically, they consist of large vascular spaces lined by flattened endothelium and separated by fibrous septa. Malignant potential is absent. Their internal circulation is slow. The CT appearance of hemangioma is similar to that of hemangioendothelioma. On unenhanced CT scans, hemangiomas are hypoattenuating masses and have the same attenuation value as large blood vessels. On enhanced scans, they demonstrate nodular peripheral enhancement that is isoattenuating with large vessels, and they show progressive central fill-in over time and then rapid washout (Fig. 6.22) (58,59). The finding of globular enhancement appears to be highly sensitive (88%) and specific (84% to 100%) for the diagnosis of hemangioma (59,60). Small lesions may show early uniform enhancement (termed the bright dot sign) (61), whereas
P.190

P.191

large lesions may demonstrate persistent hypoattenuating centers.
Figure 6.19. Hemangioendotheliomas. A: Hepatic arterial phase image shows peripheral enhancement in multiple lesions. B: Coronal multiplanar reformatted image shows the hepatic arterial supply (arrow) to one of the larger lesions in the right hepatic lobe. C: Portal venous image shows complete enhancement of the lesions.
Figure 6.20. Small hemangioendothelioma. Hepatic arterial phase scan demonstrates multiple small lesions (arrows) with nearly complete early fill-in at 15 seconds after start of contrast administration.
Figure 6.21. Giant hemangioendothelioma. Hepatic arterial phase CT scan shows a large mass in the right hepatic lobe. Note the characteristic peripheral enhancement, which allows a diagnosis of a vascular lesion. The central hypoattenuating area did not fill in on delayed scans, likely representing necrosis or scar.
Figure 6.22. Hemangioma. A: Arterial phase CT demonstrates peripheral nodular enhancement. Note the attenuation is equivalent to that of the blood in the aorta. B: Portal venous phase scan shows near complete enhancement of the lesion. The attenuation is now similar to that of hepatic veins.
Arteriovenous Malformations
Arteriovenous malformation (AVM) is not a true tumor with growth potential, but it is a congenital abnormality characterized by multiple blood vessels with direct arteriovenous connections and shunting (62). It may be an incidental finding or present as high-output congestive heart failure. It is typically limited to one hepatic lobe or segment. On CT, hepatic AVM results in early enhancement of the hepatic or portal veins or inferior vena cava, which show a time– density curve similar to that of the aorta (Fig. 6.23).
Mesenchymal Hamartoma
Mesenchymal hamartoma, also referred to as lymphangioma, bile cell fibroadenoma, hamartoma, and cystic hamartoma, is a benign hepatic tumor that arises from the mesenchyme of the portal tract (26,27,28,63). Pathologically, it is a well-circumscribed mass containing mul-tiple cystic spaces ranging in size from a few millimeters to >15 cm in diameter, filled with clear yellow fluid and surrounded by dense tissue composed of mes-enchyme, abnormal bile ducts, and hepatocytes (26,27,28). Most patients (85%) are younger than 2 years of age (28). Boys are affected slightly more often than girls. Affected patients usually present with a palpable mass or painless abdominal enlargement. Rarely, congestive heart failure, caused by a large vascular component that produces arteriovenous shunting, is a presenting sign. Surgical resection is the treatment of choice. Malignant transformation of a mesenchymal hamartoma into an undifferentiated embryonal sarcoma has been reported, but this is extremely rare (64,65).
The CT appearance of mesenchymal hamartoma is that of a multicystic mass containing multiple fluid-filled locules surrounded by soft tissue attenuation septations of variable thickness (Fig. 6.24) (1,2,66,67). The septations enhance following administration of intravenous contrast agent but not the fluid within the cysts. In contradistinction, undifferentiated sarcoma, the malignant counterpoint of this tumor, tends to contain more solid peripheral components (Fig. 6.13). However, the appearances of these two cystic tumors can overlap and tissue sampling is needed for a specific diagnosis.
Epithelial Lesions
Focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatic adenomas are benign lesions that account for <2% of hepatic tumors in childhood
P.192

(26,27,28). Focal nodular hyperplasia is a vascular neoplasm composed of normal hepatocytes with a central scar and radiating fibrous septa, which contain bile ducts, blood vessels, and Kupffer cells (26,28). Hepatic adenoma contains normal hepatocytes, but it lacks bile ducts and portal tracts. Intratumoral hemorrhage and lipids are common (26,28).
Figure 6.23. Arteriovenous malformations. A: Portal vein to hepatic vein fistula. Hepatic arterial phase image in a neonate with congestive heart failure shows simultaneous filling of the portal vein (open arrow) and hepatic vein (black arrow). B: Portal vein (arrow) to inferior vena cava (C) fistula. C, D: Hepatic artery (HA) to portal vein (PV) fistula. (See color insert.)
Hepatic adenomas in childhood have been associated with type I glycogen storage disease (von Gierke disease), Fanconi anemia, and galactosemia, whereas focal nodular hyperplasia has no strong association with pre-existing abnormalities (68). Patients with both types of tumors may be asymptomatic or they may present with hepatomegaly or right upper quadrant discomfort. Patients with adenomas also can present with acute abdominal pain secondary to tumor infarction, hemorrhage, or rupture.
Focal nodular hyperplasia usually has a smooth surface and ill-defined margins, unless a pseudocapsule is
P.193

present, and it is typically subcapsular in location. It is iso- or hypoattenuating to normal parenchyma on unenhanced CT (69), is markedly hyperattenuating on hepatic artery phase imaging, and is isoattenuating on portal venous phase imaging (69,70,71,72,73) (Fig. 6.25). A fibrous central scar is present in about 65% of lesions >3 cm and in about 35% of lesions <3 cm (73). When present, the scar is hypoattenuating to surrounding lesion on arterial and portal venous phases of enhancement; it may show enhancement on delayed (5 to 10 minutes) images, and it rarely (<2% of cases) may contain calcifications (72). Multiplanar reformations can help show the feeding arteries and veins (71,73).
Figure 6.24. Mesenchymal hamartoma. Portal venous phase CT scan shows a well-circumscribed, thin-walled, near-water-attenuation mass containing soft tissue septations.
The CT appearance of hepatic adenoma is variable. Uncomplicated lesions are homogeneous, whereas lesions with hemorrhage, lipid, or necrosis are heterogeneous (Fig. 6.26). On unenhanced CT, the lesion may be hypoattenuating to adjacent parenchyma owing to the presence of old hemorrhage, lipid material, or necrosis, or it may be hyperattenuating owing to recent hemorrhage. Hepatic adenoma usually shows moderate heterogeneous enhancement during the arterial and early portal venous phases after administration of intravenous contrast agent (74,75) (Fig. 6.26). The lesion becomes isoattenuating during late portal venous phase imaging. Occasionally, a thin tumor capsule can be identified. The appearance of hepatic adenoma overlaps with that of focal nodular hyperplasia, although the extent of arterial phase enhancement of adenoma tends to be less than that of focal nodular hyperplasia. The presence of fat or hemorrhage within the lesion also supports the diagnosis of adenoma.
Figure 6.25. Focal nodular hyperplasia. Hepatic arterial phase CT scan shows marked homogeneous enhancement of a subcapsular mass, which contains a thin, hypoattenuating central scar (arrow).
Nodular Regenerative Hyperplasia
Nodular regenerative hyperplasia is a rare lesion, although it has been described in infants and children. This entity has been reported in children receiving chemotherapy, but it also has been seen with a variety of non-neoplastic conditions (76). Pathologically, the nodules are composed of normal hepatocytes, and while the uninvolved liver may be compressed it displays no fibrosis or cirrhosis. The lesions are hypervascular during the arterial phase of imaging, showing a homogeneous or heterogeneous enhancement pattern. The lesions become isodense to adjacent parenchyma during the portal venous phase. The appearance is similar to that of focal nodular hyperplasia and tissue sampling is needed for diagnosis.
Cyst
Simple hepatic cysts are rare in children, and they are usually congenital rather than acquired. Congenital cysts arise from intrahepatic biliary ducts that fail to involute. Acquired cysts are the result of inflammation, trauma, or parasitic disease. Hepatic cysts may be multiple or solitary. Multiple cysts usually are seen in association with autosomal dominant polycystic disease. Most hepatic cysts are asymptomatic, although large ones may present as an abdominal mass or hepatomegaly or they may produce abdominal pain secondary to superimposed infection or hemorrhage.
The CT appearance of hepatic cyst is similar to that of cysts elsewhere in the body. On CT, cysts appear as nonenhancing, sharply delineated, round or oval, masses
P.194

with imperceptible walls and near-water attenuation (<20 HU) (77) (Fig. 6.27). Most cysts are unilocular, but occasionally one or two internal septations can be identified. Hemorrhage into a hepatic cyst results in a higher attenuation value (>20 HU).
Figure 6.26. Hepatocellular adenoma. A: Precontrast CT scan demonstrates a heterogeneous mass. Areas of hypoattenuation and hyperattenuation represent lipid material (L) and hemorrhage (H), respectively. B: Early portal venous phase scan shows moderate enhancement (arrow) of the peripheral solid part of the mass. The lipid material and hemorrhagic area do not enhance. C: Portal venous phase scan in another patient demonstrates a moderately enhancing heterogeneous mass (arrow). The lipid portion of the mass does not enhance. Note that the degree of enhancement is less than that of focal nodular hyperplasia.
Byler disease, also called familial intrahepatic cholestasis, is another cause of hepatic cysts. Nearly all patients with Byler disease have periportal fibrosis and micronodular cirrhosis; the cysts are thought to result from cystic dilatation of obstructed periductal glands (78). Contrast-enhanced CT shows multiple cystic lesions, sometimes containing enhancing vessels (the central dot sign) (Fig. 6.28). The cysts do not communicate with the dilated ducts.
Other cystic masses, including echinococcal cyst, biloma, chronic hematoma, and abscess, may have attenuation values identical to that of simple hepatic cysts. These are discussed below. The clinical history, especially the patient's nationality or travel history in cases of hydatid disease,
P.195

can help suggest the correct diagnosis. Findings such as a thick or irregular wall, internal septations, or an attenuation value >20 HU also should suggest the possibility of a diagnosis other than a simple cyst. Confirmation of a specific diagnosis may require percutaneous aspiration.
Figure 6.27. Simple cyst. CT shows a sharply defined, homogeneous, water-attenuation mass without a perceptible wall.
Figure 6.28. Byler disease. Several well-circumscribed, near-water-attenuation cysts are present in the right lobe of the liver.
Abscesses
Pyogenic Abscess
Pyogenic abscesses can result from trauma owing to penetrating injuries; contiguous spread of infection from adjacent organs, such as lung or bowel; arterial or portal venous spread related to septicemia; or less commonly from an ascending cholangitis (79). Immunosuppressed children, especially those with chronic granulomatous disease of childhood (X-linked recessive disorder characterized by failure of the leukocytes to lyse phagocytized bacteria), are particularly at risk of developing hepatic abscesses. Patients usually are symptomatic, presenting with fever, upper abdominal pain or discomfort, and occasionally hepatomegaly.
Figure 6.29. Pyogenic hepatic abscess. A: Contrast-enhanced CT scan shows low-attenuation mass with a thin enhancing rim in the right hepatic lobe. B: CT scan in another patient shows a large multilocular mass containing multiple small abscesses.
Hepatic abscesses have a predilection for the superior portion of the right lobe. The characteristic CT appearance is that of a well-circumscribed, hypoattenuating (10 to 20 HU), unilocular or multilocular mass with a contrast-enhancing rim (Fig. 6.29). Another pattern is the double-target sign, characterized by a hypoattenuating central area, a surrounding hyperattenuating ring, and an outer hypoattenuating zone (80). In some cases, an aggregate of multiple small abscesses, <2 cm (the cluster sign), may be seen (81). The CT appearance of hepatic abscess is not specific, and it also can be seen with complicated cysts, hematomas, and necrotic tumors. The most specific sign of abscess is intracavitary gas, in the form of either multiple bubbles or an air–fluid level (Fig. 6.30). Unfortunately, central gas occurs in only a few cases. Pyogenic hepatic abscesses, even multiloculated ones, usually respond to a combination of antibiotics and percutaneous catheter drainage.
Cat-scratch Disease
Cat-scratch disease is characterized pathologically by a granulomatous or suppurative reaction to infection by
P.196

Bartonella henselae. It occurs in immunocompetent children and adolescents who have been scratched by a domestic cat. Patients present with fever and unilateral lymph node enlargement proximal to the site of inoculation. Contrast-enhanced CT shows multiple small nodular lesions, ranging between 3 mm and 2 cm in diameter (Fig. 6.31) (82). The appearance is nonspecific, and the differential diagnosis includes other infectious diseases, such as other pyogenic or fungal abscesses; neoplastic diseases, including metastatic disease and lymphoma; and other granulomatous diseases, such as tuberculosis and sarcoidosis.
Figure 6.30. Gas-containing pyogenic abscess. A well-circumscribed mass with an air–fluid level and enhancing wall is noted in the dome of the liver. Also noted is a right pleural effusion (E).
Figure 6.31. Cat-scratch disease. Contrast-enhanced CT scans shows numerous low-attenuation lesions (arrows) throughout the liver that were due to Bartonella henselae infection.
Amebic Abscess
Amebiasis is caused by the parasite Entamoeba histolytica. Infection is common in tropical or subtropical climates, with cases also reported in the southwestern United States. The most frequent site of involvement by amebiasis is the intestine. In the bowel, cysts that have been ingested in contaminated water or food dissolve, and the trophozoites colonize the colon, usually the cecum and ascending colon. The parasites may then penetrate the colonic mucosa and reach the liver via the portal system. The frequency of hepatic disease is 3% to 9% (83). Approximately 75% of hepatic amebic abscesses occur in the right lobe. Affected patients commonly present with right upper quadrant pain or tenderness. CT findings of amebic abscess are a solitary, unilocular, hypoattenuating (10 to 20 HU) mass with an enhancing wall (84) (Fig. 6.32). The wall may be smooth, nodular, or irregular, and in some cases, it may be surrounded by an incomplete hypoattenuating zone of edema (84). Imaging features of amebic and pyogenic abscess are similar, and aspiration of the fluid contents is needed for diagnosis. Medical therapy is effective in most patients with amebic abscesses, but percutaneous drainage may be required in some cases (83).
Fungal Microabscesses
Fungal microabscesses are found almost exclusively in immunocompromised patients (85,86). The common inciting agent is Candida albicans and less frequently Aspergillus sp. or Cryptococcus sp. At CT, fungal microabscesses appear as multiple, small, hypoattenuating masses scattered throughout both lobes of the liver (Fig. 6.33)
P.197

(85,86,87,88). Occasionally, the abscesses contain a central high attenuation focus, believed to represent hyphae. Some lesions also may show rim enhancement (85). Concomitant abscesses in the spleen and kidney are frequent (86). The CT appearance of fungal abscesses is not specific; metastases, lymphoma, pyogenic or mycobacterial infection, cat-scratch disease, and multifocal steatosis can have similar appearances.
Figure 6.32. Amebic abscess. Contrast-enhanced CT shows a large low-attenuation mass (M) with an enhancing wall and surrounding hypoattenuating rim of edema (arrowhead).
Figure 6.33. Fungal microabscesses. Multiple low-attenuation lesions are present in the right hepatic lobe. Blood culture was positive for Candida albicans.
Medical therapy with antifungal drugs is the treatment for fungal abscesses. The lesions usually regress completely with antifungal treatment. Occasionally, sterilized lesions may persist and in some instances may calcify (86,87,89).
Hydatid Disease
Hydatid disease is a parasitic infestation caused by the larval stage of the tapeworm Echinococcus granulosus or by Echinococcus alveolaris, the former being the more common in the United States. The liver is the most common site of involvement. Hepatic involvement by E. granulosus produces unilocular or multilocular cysts with thick or thin walls (90,91,92,93) (Fig. 6.34). Wall calcification is common (90,91,92,93). Usually, there is one dominant cyst (the mother cyst), which is surrounded by a number of smaller cysts (daughter cysts) (Fig. 6.34). Less commonly, the daughter cysts occupy almost the entire volume of the mother cyst. Surgical excision or percutaneous drainage combined with albendazole therapy has been the standard treatment of hepatic hydatid cysts (94,95). Dense calcification of the cyst may be noted during the healing process (Fig. 6.35).
Figure 6.34. Hydatid abscess. Contrast-enhanced CT demonstrates a large cyst (C) (the mother cyst) with thin, enhancing walls in the right hepatic lobe. Smaller daughter cysts (arrows) surround the mother cyst. Serologic cultures were positive for Echinococcus granulosus infection.
In contradistinction to the CT appearance produced by E. granulosus, hepatic involvement by E. alveolaris produces solid ill-defined infiltrating masses, which are hypoattenuating to adjacent normal parenchyma and do not undergo contrast enhancement (96,97). Calcification is common, present in approximately 90% of cases. The CT appearance is not specific, and it may simulate a primary malignancy or hepatic metastases. Surgical excision in combination with antiparasitic therapy is the treatment of choice (98).
Figure 6.35. Hydatid abscess. Contrast-enhanced CT scan shows a well-circumscribed mass with marked peripheral and internal calcifications, consistent with the healing process.
P.198

Bacillary Angiomatosis
Bacillary angiomatosis is an infection occurring in immunosuppressed patients caused by Bartonella henselae (99). It is a vascular proliferative lesion that predominantly affects the skin, but it can involve the liver. In the liver, it produces cystic, blood-filled spaces (termed peliosis hepatis, see below). On CT, it appears as multiple hypoattenuating or hyperattenuating lesions, usually <1 cm, scattered throughout the liver.
Diffuse Hepatic Diseases
Steatosis
There are two histologic types of hepatic steatosis: microvacuolar and macrovacuolar steatosis (100). In microvacuolar steatosis, tiny fat droplets or vacuoles fill the hepatocytes without displacing the nucleus; in the macrovacuolar type, one or more large droplets of fat fill the hepatocyte without expanding it and push the nucleus against the cell wall. Causes of microvacuolar steatosis include acute fatty liver of pregnancy, Reye syndrome, cystic fibrosis, and massive tetracycline therapy. Patients are acutely ill and present with a painful liver, vomiting, jaundice, and coma. Microvacuolar steatosis is rarely reversible.
Macrovacuolar steatosis is indolent and usually asymptomatic, although substantial fatty infiltration may produce smooth hepatomegaly and elevated serum liver function tests. Causes include nutritional abnormalities (Kwashiorkor, obesity, intestinal bypass); metabolic diseases; drug-related diseases (corticosteroids); viral infections; and cryptogenic disorders. Macrovacuolar steatosis is reversible if the underlying abnormality can be corrected.
Steatosis may be diffuse or focal. The attenuation of the normal liver measures 40 to 65 HU and is generally greater than that of the spleen. In patients with diffuse fatty replacement, the attenuation is decreased, measuring less than the spleen on unenhanced CT scans. With marked steatosis, the attenuation of the liver becomes less than that of hepatic venous structures, and as a result, the hepatic vessels stand out as high-attenuation structures against the background of low-attenuation fat (Fig. 6.36). Hepatic steatosis is more difficult to diagnose on contrast-enhanced CT scans because the spleen becomes higher in attenuation than the liver.
Focal hepatic steatosis can be patchy, segmental, or lobar with margins that are well circumscribed or ill defined (Fig. 6.37). Hence, the appearance may simulate that of hepatic neoplasm or abscess. However, focal steatosis has several characteristic features that can be helpful in differentiating it from hepatic mass lesions: (a) typical periportal or periligamentous location (e.g., anterior to the portal vein and adjacent to the fissure for the ligamentum teres); (b) absence of vascular displacement or distortion; (c) absence of mass effect and bulging of the hepatic contour; (d) sharply angulated borders; and (e) a nonspherical configuration (101).
Figure 6.36. Diffuse steatosis. Unenhanced CT demonstrates markedly decreased attenuation of the liver, compared with that of the spleen. The intrahepatic vessels stand out as high-attenuation structures against the low-attenuation background.
Iron Overload
Hemochromatosis refers to the presence of increased iron storage in the liver, leading to hepatic dysfunction.
P.199

There are three major types of hemochromatosis: (a) primary or genetic, (b) secondary, and (c) transfusional iron overload (102). Primary hemochromatosis is an HLA-linked inherited disorder in which a mucosal defect in the intestinal wall leads to increased absorption of ingested iron, which is deposited in parenchymal cells of the liver. Most patients eventually develop hepatic fibrosis or cirrhosis. Secondary or erythropoietic hemochromatosis results from increased absorption of iron secondary to excessive red cell breakdown, usually related to an underlying hemolytic anemia or excessive iron ingestion. Transfusional iron overload is found in patients who undergo multiple blood transfusions. The iron from the transfused erythrocytes is deposited in the liver and also in the spleen and bone marrow.
Figure 6.37. Multifocal hepatic steatosis. Unenhanced CT demonstrates patchy hypoattenuating areas in the right lobe of the liver. Opposed phase magnetic resonance imaging confirmed the presence of steatosis.
The characteristic CT finding of hemochromatosis is an increase in hepatic attenuation on unenhanced CT scans (Fig. 6.38). By comparison with normal unenhanced parenchyma, which has mean attenuation values of 40 to 65 HU, the liver in hemochromatosis has attenuation values of ≥70 HU (103,104). The sensitivity of single-energy CT scanning at 120 kVp for the diagnosis of iron overload is approximately 63% (104). Thus, normal attenuation values do not exclude the diagnosis of hemochromatosis. In some cases, reducing the scanning energy to 80 kVp may help make the diagnosis of iron overload if scanning at 120 kVp is equivocal (103). Increased attenuation values are not specific for iron overload and can be seen in other disorders, such as glycogen storage disease and Wilson disease, and also in patients who are receiving hyperalimentation or antineoplastic drugs, such as cis-diamminedichloro platinum (105).
Figure 6.38. Hemochromatosis. The attenuation value of the liver is markedly higher than that of the spleen on this unenhanced CT in an adolescent girl who had multiple transfusions for sickle cell anemia.
Storage Disorders
Glycogen storage disease type I (von Gierke disease) results in the deposition of glycogen in multiple areas of the body, including the liver. The most common finding of hepatic involvement is hepatomegaly. Hepatic attenuation is normal or hypoattenuating owing to the associated steatosis (106,107). Less often, the liver is hyperattenuating, owing to the increased x-ray attenuation of the deposited glycogen. Hepatic adenomas and hepatocellular carcinomas have been reported in association with glycogen storage disease (68,108,109,110,111) (Fig. 6.39).
Wilson disease is an autosomal recessive abnormality of copper metabolism characterized by excessive copper deposition in the liver, brain, and cornea. A hyperattenuating liver may be seen on unenhanced CT (112,113). Portal hypertension and cirrhosis, hepatic adenoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma are complications of long-standing disease.
Hepatitis
Hepatitis is a generalized inflammatory process of the hepatic parenchyma, and the leading cause of hepatitis in children is viral infection. Common pathogens are hepatitis A, B, C, non-A, and non-B viruses, but cytomegalovirus, herpes, and Epstein–Barr virus also can result in hepatitis.
P.200

Less often, injury from inhalation, ingestion, or parenteral administration of drugs or toxins is a cause of hepatic inflammation. Histologically, acute hepatitis is characterized by cellular necrosis and inflammatory cellular infiltration, usually sparing the portal tracts. Chronic hepatitis is classified as persistent or active. In chronic persistent hepatitis, periportal inflammation is present without architectural disruption; in chronic active hepatitis, there is extensive inflammation, necrosis, fibrosis, and architectural distortion (114,115).
Figure 6.39. Hepatocellular carcinoma associated with glycogen storage disease. Multiple relatively hyperattenuating masses stand out against the background of diffuse steatosis.
Diagnostic imaging is not required in patients with clinical evidence supporting the diagnosis of uncomplicated acute hepatitis, but imaging can be useful to identify cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis. The CT appearance of hepatitis varies with the severity and chronicity of the disease process. CT findings in acute hepatitis include hepatomegaly, diffuse fatty infiltration, enlarged nodes in the porta hepatis or gastrohe-patic ligament, gallbladder wall thickening, and periportal lucency (Fig. 6.40) (116). Findings of chronic hepatitis are similar to those seen in cirrhosis (see below).
Cirrhosis
Cirrhosis is the result of cellular destruction, which leads to regeneration and fibrosis (115). Common causes of cirrhosis in the pediatric population are bile stasis (e.g., as a result of biliary atresia or cystic fibrosis), hereditary diseases (e.g., Wilson disease, glycogen storage disease, tyrosinemia, galactosemia), and hepatitis (117,118,119,120). The role of CT in patients with cirrhosis is to evaluate liver size and the magnitude of portal hypertension prior to transplantation. In early cirrhosis, the liver often appears normal.
Figure 6.40. Acute hepatitis. Contrast-enhanced CT shows mild steatosis, gallbladder wall thickening (arrows), and ascites.
Figure 6.41. Cirrhosis. Contrast-enhanced CT shows a small nodular liver (L) with atrophy of the medial (M) segment of the left hepatic lobe and hypertrophy of the caudate (C) lobe. Note also an enlarged spleen with a peripheral infarction (arrows), perihepatic ascites, and a small right pleural effusion.
CT features of advanced cirrhosis include decreased hepatic size, heterogeneous parenchyma, irregular or nodular hepatic margins owing to the presence of regenerating nodules, and atrophy of the right hepatic lobe and medial segment of the left lobe with relative enlargement of the caudate lobe and left lateral segment (Fig. 6.41) (121,122,123). The ratio of the transverse width of the caudate lobe to the transverse width of the right hepatic lobe has been used for the diagnosis of cirrhosis (124). Although a caudate-to–right lobe ratio of ≥0.65 has been reported to be highly specific (100%) for cirrhosis, the sensitivity of this ratio can be <50% (124). In practice, measured ratios are rarely, if ever, needed for the diagnosis of cirrhosis, as the characteristic morphologic changes associated with cirrhosis are easily seen on visual inspection.
Regenerating nodules can be difficult to identify on unenhanced, arterial phase, and portal venous CT because they often are isoattenuating with liver. Some regenerating nodules, however, may become hypoattenuating during the arterial and portal venous phases of enhancement (Fig. 6.42). If they contain substantial hemosiderin, they may be recognized as high-attenuation nodules on unenhanced CT (Fig. 6.43) (125).
Secondary signs of cirrhosis include ascites, splenomegaly, and portosystemic collateral vessels. Portosystemic collateral vessels are a finding of portal hypertension and are described below.
P.201

Figure 6.42. Regenerating nodules. Several hypoattenuating nodules are seen in the right hepatic lobe on a portal venous phase image. Note also the irregular contour of the liver and associated ascites (A), characteristic of cirrhosis.
Vascular Disorders
Portal Hypertension
Portal hypertension results when there is increased intrahepatic resistance to hepatopetal blood flow. Rarely, it is the consequence of increased blood flow owing to an arteriovenous fistula. Clinical features of portal hypertension include splenomegaly, ascites, prominent abdominal veins (caput medusae), hematemesis, and hypersplenism.
Figure 6.43. Regenerating nodules, Wilson disease. Unenhanced CT scan shows numerous, small, hyperattenuating nodules owing to the presence of hemosiderin. The nodular contour of the liver and ascites (A) support the diagnosis of cirrhosis.
Obstruction to portal venous flow can occur at three levels: (a) prehepatic, caused by portal or splenic vein thrombosis; (b) intrahepatic, secondary to cirrhosis; and (c) post-hepatic, secondary to obstruction of hepatic venous outflow (126).
With increasing intrahepatic resistance and portal hypertension, portosystemic collaterals develop and blood flow is directed away from the liver to lower- pressure systemic vessels (hepatofugal flow). There are two main types of portosystemic shunts—tributary and developed collaterals (Fig. 6.44) (127). The former normally drain the portal venous system and include left gastric, short gastric, and superior and inferior mesenteric veins; the latter collaterals are normally not functional and include paraumbilical and splenorenal vessels.
At CT, portosystemic collaterals appear as well-defined, round, tubular, or serpentine structures that usually enhance to the same extent as adjacent vessels (128). The most common portosystemic shunts are the left gastric vein (coronary vein) to inferior esophageal vein, the paraumbilical to left portal vein, and the splenic vein to left renal vein. The left gastric (coronary) vein arises near the portosplenic confluence and ascends to the gastroesophageal junction to drain into the esophageal veins (Fig. 6.45). The recanalized paraumbilical vein connects with the left portal vein, which drains to the inferior epigastric veins in the anterior abdominal wall near the umbilicus (Fig. 6.46). The splenorenal collateral pathway shunts blood from the splenic vein via the splenorenal ligament into the left renal vein (Fig. 6.46).
Other portosystemic collaterals include gastrorenal, intestinal (mesentericocaval), and hemorrhoidal varices. Gastrorenal collaterals divert blood from the left gastric vein and short gastric veins to the left adrenal vein, which empties into the renal vein. Intestinal collaterals shunt blood from the superior mesenteric vein to the inferior vena cava through the root of the small bowel mesentery. The inferior mesenteric vein shunts splanchnic blood to the inferior hemorrhoidal vein.
Portal Vein Thrombosis
Portal vein thrombosis is a cause of presinusoidal portal hypertension. In the pediatric population, common causes include sepsis, dehydration, shock, umbilical vein catheterization, and portal vein invasion by tumor. Less frequent causes include compression of the portal vein by enlarged periportal nodes or an enlarged pancreas, omphalitis, pylephlebitis owing to intra-abdominal
P.202

infection or inflammation (129), and coagulopathy disorders. Patients usually present with acute or subacute abdominal pain and occasionally with splenomegaly.
Figure 6.44. Portal hypertension. Diagram shows the two main types of portosystemic shunts. A: Tributary collaterals of the portal venous system. Tributary collaterals are vessels that normally communicate with the portal venous system. The most common are the left gastric or coronary vein, the short gastric veins, and the superior and inferior mesenteric veins. B: Developed collaterals. Developed collaterals arise from recanalization of pre-existing vessels that are not functional tributaries of the portal venous system. The most common are the paraumbilical vein and splenorenal and splenoretroperitoneal vessels. (Reprinted from
Freeny PC. Portal venous system. In: Freeny PC, Stevenson GW, eds. Alimentary Tract Radiology. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 1994:1566–1603, with permission.
)
Figure 6.45. Esophageal varices. Contrast-enhanced CT demonstrates large enhancing periesophageal collateral vessels (arrows) in a patient with portal hypertension.
CT findings of acute portal vein thrombosis are a filling defect that completely or incompletely fills the portal vein lumen. The involved portal vein usually is enlarged (130). On unenhanced scans, acute thrombus may be hyperattenuating to liver. Following the administration of contrast medium, acute thrombus is hypoattenuating to surrounding tissue (Fig. 6.47). Streaky or diffuse enhancement of the obstructed portal vein indicates the presence of tumor clot rather than bland thrombus. With chronic portal vein thrombosis, small periportal collateral veins (portal vein cavernoma) can be seen (Fig. 6.48). These collaterals shunt blood around the obstructed vein into the liver, and they form only in patients who have normal intrahepatic circulation. Hepatic atrophy is also a late finding of portal venous thrombosis.
Two-flow related findings can be seen on contrast-enhanced scans. Decreased lobar or segmental parenchymal enhancement can occur during the portal venous
P.203

phase owing to locally diminished portal venous perfusion. Increased hepatic parenchymal enhancement can be seen during the late arterial phase owing to increased hepatic arterial flow to an area in which portal venous flow is decreased (131). The latter phenomenon is referred to as transient hepatic attenuation difference (THAD).
Figure 6.46. Portosystemic collateral vessels. Contrast-enhanced CT shows a recanalized paraumbilical vein (white arrow) and a large splenic vein draining into an enlarged left renal vein (black arrow). Note splenomegaly, dilated intrahepatic ducts, renal cysts, and ascites in this patient who has Caroli disease and portal venous hypertension.
Figure 6.47. Acute portal vein thrombosis. Contrast-enhanced CT demonstrates nonenhancing thrombus (arrow) in the lumen of the main portal vein.
Figure 6.48. Portal vein thrombosis with cavernous transformation. Contrast-enhanced CT shows multiple small dilated collateral veins (arrow) in the porta hepatis. Ascites is secondary to portal hypertension.
Budd–Chiari Syndrome
The Budd–Chiari syndrome refers to the clinical and pathologic abnormalities seen in the setting of obstruction to hepatic venous outflow, which can be at the level of the large hepatic veins or the inferior vena cava. Patients present with ascites, abdominal pain, jaundice, tender hepatomegaly, and hepatic failure. Most cases are idiopathic, but several specific causes have been described including hepatotoxins, radiation, chemotherapy, coagulation disorders, tumor thrombus (particularly Wilms tumor), and congenital webs or membranes involving the hepatic veins or inferior vena cava.
In acute thrombosis, noncontrast CT findings include diffuse hepatic hypoattenuation owing to parenchymal congestion, hepatomegaly, ascites, and hyperattenuating thrombi in the inferior vena cava or hepatic veins (132,133). Contrast-enhanced CT findings include homogeneous enhancement of the caudate lobe, a patchy or reticulated pattern of parenchymal enhancement in other hepatic segments, nonvisualized or small hepatic veins, and hypoattenuating thrombus within the hepatic veins or the inferior vena cava (Fig. 6.49) (132,133,134,135). Less common CT findings include hepatic infarcts, appearing as nonenhancing peripheral wedge-shaped areas; narrowing or occlusion of the inferior vena cava caused by pressure from an enlarged caudate lobe; and concomitant portal vein thrombosis. Extrahepatic findings include ascites, pleural fluid, and gallbladder wall edema.
CT findings of chronic venous occlusion include caudate lobe hypertrophy, compressed or poorly visualized hepatic veins, heterogeneous parenchymal enhancement (132), portosystemic collaterals, indicating portal hypertension, and splenomegaly. The collateral vessels are
P.204

usually intrahepatic (hepatic vein–to–hepatic vein and hepatic vein–to–portal vein) rather than extrahepatic shunts.
Figure 6.49. Acute Budd–Chiari syndrome. Contrast-enhanced CT scan shows heterogeneous parenchymal enhancement and nonvisualization of the hepatic veins. There is a small right pleural effusion (arrow).
Hepatic Veno-occlusive Disease
Veno-occlusive disease of the liver is the result of obstruction of small sublobular or postsinusoidal veins. It has been associated with hepatotoxins, and it also occurs in patients receiving radiation, chemotherapy, or bone marrow transplantation (136). Hepatotoxins cause hepatic edema, which slows blood flow within portal and hepatic venules, which in turn leads to venous stasis and subsequent thrombosis. Chemotherapy and irradiation produce inflammation of the endothelium of small venules and ultimately vessel occlusion. Clinical features include hepato-megaly, right upper quadrant pain, jaundice, and ascites. The diagnosis is difficult on CT, since sublobular veins cannot be directly visualized. Biopsy is generally required for definitive diagnosis.
Passive Venous Congestion
Passive venous congestion in children is usually the result of severe right-sided heart failure and less commonly a complication of constrictive pericarditis. Acute venous congestion increases hepatic venous pressure, which in turn leads to decreased hepatic arterial flow and hypoxemia (137). Patients with hepatic congestion have tender hepatomegaly, abnormal liver function tests, or both findings.
The primary CT findings of passive congestion are heterogeneous mosaiclike parenchymal enhancement and dilatation of the hepatic veins and inferior cava owing to reflux of contrast-enhanced blood from the right atrium (Fig. 6.50) (137,138,139). Secondary findings include periportal hypoattenuation (140), cardiomegaly, pleural effusions, and ascites. The reticulated-mosaic enhancement pattern in passive venous congestion is indistinguishable from that seen in Budd–Chiari syndrome. However, in contrast to the Budd–Chiari syndrome, the hepatic veins in passive congestion are distended or enlarged rather than being small or poorly visualized.
Figure 6.50. Passive hepatic venous congestion. Portal venous phase CT in a 14-year-old girl with pericarditis shows hepatomegaly and mosaic-like hepatic parenchymal enhancement. Note a dilated inferior vena cava (arrow), which is attributed to reflux of contrast-enhanced blood from the right atrium, and ascites.
Hepatic Infarction
Hepatic infarction is relatively uncommon because the liver has a dual blood supply. It usually is a complication of trauma or surgery. Acute infarction can be diffuse (Fig. 6.51) or focal. Focal infarction can have three patterns on CT: wedge shaped, rounded, or irregular areas of low attenuation paralleling bile ducts (141). Wedge-shaped infarcts are usually peripheral, whereas rounded lesions may have a peripheral or central location. With subsequent tissue necrosis, gas collections may be identified (142). Chronic changes include lobar or segmental atrophy and formation of hypoattenuating bile lakes, owing to biliary ductal necrosis.
Peliosis Hepatis
Peliosis hepatis is a rare condition characterized by hepatic sinusoidal dilatation. The disease has been associated with hematologic disorders, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), bacillary angiomatosis, and chronic
P.205

steroid therapy (143,144). Contrast-enhanced CT findings include multiple, small hypoattenuating lesions with delayed enhancement, large hypoattenuating areas with mild rim enhancement, and small round lesions with early enhancement (143,144,145,146). The CT apprearance mimics that of hemangioma, focal nodular hyperplasia, and nodular regenerative hyperplasia.
Figure 6.51. Hepatic infarction. A: Contrast-enhanced CT shows an enlarged liver with an attenuation that is markedly lower than that of the spleen (S). Some relatively normal parenchyma is noted posteriorly. B: Sagittal multiplanar reformation shows the occlusion of the distal portion of the hepatic artery (arrow). The hepatic artery thrombus was a complication of a Kasai procedure for biliary atresia. (Case courtesy of Edward Lee, MD.)
Radiation Effects
The liver usually is not directly irradiated, even for the treatment of malignant tumors, but it may be incidentally included in the ports designed to encompass neoplastic disease in adjacent organs or viscera. Acute radiation injury causes edema and hepatic congestion, which appear on CT as a sharply demarcated area of decreased attenuation. Chronic changes include atrophy of the involved segment or lobe and rarely cirrhosis (147).
Hepatic Transplantation
Liver transplantation is the only treatment for end-stage liver disease. Three main types of transplantation procedures are used in children: whole pediatric cadaveric organ grafting, split adult cadaveric organ grafting, and living related adult organ grafting. The number of cadaveric donor livers is limited in the pediatric population, and therefore, the living related donor option has become important. The technique of split liver grafting consists of dividing the donor liver such that the left lateral liver graft is transplanted into a small child and the right and remainder of the left lobe are transplanted into a large child or adolescent. In living donor grafts, the left lateral segments (II and III) or the whole left lobe segment (II to IV) are used for grafting (148,149); this technique is performed in infants and small children.
Surgical Anatomy
In the cadaveric procedure, the portal vein, vena cava, common hepatic artery, and common bile duct of the donor are anastomosed to the recipient. The donor bile duct is anastomosed to the recipient common duct or if the duct is too small, it is anastomosed to a loop of small bowel. In living donor transplants, the left hepatic artery, left portal vein, and left and middle hepatic veins are anastomosed to the recipient vessels; the recipient's vena cava is preserved. Biliary drainage is via a Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy.
Imaging
Preoperative CT is useful for assessing the patency of the intrahepatic vessels and for calculating hepatic volume. Postoperative CT is valuable for detecting transplant-related complications (150,151,152,153,154,155,156). The complications are similar in cadaveric and living-related donor grafting and include arterial and venous stenoses (Fig. 6.52A) and thromboses, hepatic infarction, biliary leak and stricture, bilomas (Fig. 6.52B), abscesses, and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (Figs. 6.16 and 6.17).
P.206

Figure 6.52. Posttransplant complications. A: Living related donor transplant, hepatic vein stenosis. Maximum-intensity projection shows narrowing of the hepatic vein (arrow) at its junction with the inferior vena cava (C). B: Cadaveric liver transplant, bilomas. Contrast-enhanced CT scan demonstrates areas of low attenuation (arrows), representing bilomas.
A common expected finding on posttransplant CT is an irregular, hypoattenuating, nonenhancing area at the margin of the liver (157,158), representing subcapsular hepatic necrosis (Fig. 6.53). A second common finding is a hypoattenuating rim around peripheral branches of the portal vein (termed periportal lucency), thought to be owing to impaired lymphatic drainage caused by surgical disruption of lymphatic vessels (159). Both of these findings are usually minor complications of little clinical significance, although cases of posttransplant periportal low attenuation secondary to rejection or hepatic necrosis have been described (160,161).
Figure 6.53. Right lobe hepatic transplant. An irregular, hypoattenuating, nonenhancing area (arrows) at the hepatic margin represents subcapsular hepatic necrosis. Also noted is dystrophic calcification in the capsule of the liver, splenomegaly, mesenteric edema, and a small right pleural effusion.
Biliary Tract and Gallbladder
Jaundice is the most common indication for imaging the biliary tract and gallbladder. The list of potential causes of jaundice is extensive, but several disorders account for most cases of cholestasis in the pediatric population (162). Biliary atresia and the neonatal hepatitis syndrome are the most common entities causing neonatal jaundice. Less common causes of neonatal jaundice include bile duct paucity (Alagille syndrome), inspisated bile syndrome, choledochal cyst, and spontaneous perforation of the extrahepatic bile duct. In older children, jaundice is most often owing to hepatocellular disease. Biliary tract inflammation (cholangitis) and obstruction are less common causes of childhood jaundice. The causes of biliary obstruction include choledochal cyst; neoplasms such as rhabdomyosarcoma, lymphoma, and neuroblastoma; cholelithiasis; acute pancreatitis; and rarely stricture.
The combination of laboratory tests of liver function and pertinent historical and physical findings generally suffice to differentiate obstructive from nonobstructive processes. Noninvasive imaging studies, such as sonography, hepatobiliary scintigraphy, MRI, and CT, are used to confirm the clinical impression and to demonstrate the level and cause of obstruction. Sonography is usually the initial imaging study because of its lack of ionizing radiation and ready
P.207

availability. This is supplemented by radionuclide studies using hepatobiliary agents (99mTc-IDA analogs) when functional information is needed. CT or MRI are reserved for cases in which more anatomic detail is needed for surgical planning or the level or cause of obstruction cannot be determined by sonography. The choice of CT or MRI depends on availability and operator expertise.
Figure 6.54. Normal biliary tract anatomy. The main right and left hepatic ducts join to form the common hepatic duct, which joins with the cystic duct to form the common bile duct. The common bile duct courses caudally in the hepatoduodenal ligament along with the hepatic artery and portal vein to the level of the pancreatic head.
This section reviews the basic anatomy and common pathologic lesions of the biliary tract and gallbladder. The indications for performing CT in children with biliary tract and gallbladder disease are addressed.
Normal Anatomy
The biliary tree is composed of the intrahepatic ducts, the common hepatic duct, and the common bile duct (Fig. 6.54). The intrahepatic ducts course from the periphery of the liver to the hepatic hilum, where they join to form the left and right hepatic ducts. These ducts, in turn, join to form the common hepatic duct. The cystic duct inserts into the common hepatic duct, which continues as the common bile duct. The common bile duct descends from the porta hepatitis to join the pancreatic duct at the ampulla of Vater. In approximately 60% to 70% of individuals, the common bile duct and the pancreatic duct unite to drain through a common orifice in the ampulla of Vater; in the remainder of individuals, they have separate orifices.
The common bile duct adjacent to the descending duodenum and the common hepatic duct in the porta hepatis are almost always seen in older children and adolescents. Their small size and paucity of intra-abdominal fat may preclude their visualization in infants and very young small children. Intrahepatic ducts are only occasionally seen on CT; the cystic duct is not seen. The use of thinly collimated sections and intravenous contrast medium improves identification of both normal and dilated bile ducts (163). Although absolute measurements of the extrahepatic common bile duct in children have not been documented on CT, they have been established by sonography. In general, the upper limits of size are 1 mm in neonates, 2 mm in infants ≤1 year of age, 4 mm in children 1 to 10 years of age, and 6 mm in adolescents and young adults (164).
The normal gallbladder is seen as a near-water-attenuation, oval or round structure in the interlobar fissure on the inferior surface of the liver. Although the position of the fundus (the bulbous distal end of the gallbladder) varies, the body and neck of the gallbladder are nearly always located in the porta hepatis and interlobar fissure. The wall of the normal gallbladder measures between 1 and 3 mm in thickness and may enhance after intravenous contrast administration. Bile has an attenuation similar to water and does not enhance. The normal gallbladder is <1 cm in diameter and 1.5 to 3 cm in length in infants and children younger than 2 years of age and 3.5 cm in diameter and 8 cm in length in children 2 to 16 years of age (165,166).
Technique
Oral and intravenous contrast agents are routinely used in CT examinations of the abdomen. However, oral contrast in the duodenum may cause streak artifacts that obscure stones in the common bile duct. Therefore, when common bile duct calculi are suspected, water is preferred as an oral contrast agent. Unenhanced CT scans of the upper abdomen are performed when gallbladder or ductal stones are suspected. Subsequently, contrast-enhanced scans are acquired through the upper abdomen from the liver through the pancreas. Single-phase scanning nearly always suffices for evaluation of biliary tract and gallbladder disease. Multiplanar reformatting and volume-rendered reconstructions can help in tracing the course of obstructed bile ducts or the vascular structures surrounding the biliary tree. Clinical applications for helical CT cholangiography with intravenous contrast agents have not been addressed fully in children.
Diseases of the Bile Ducts
Biliary Tract Obstruction
The role of CT in children with clinically suspected biliary obstruction is to confirm or further delineate the cause and level of obstruction. The CT diagnosis of biliary obstruction is based on the demonstration of dilated intrahepatic or extrahepatic bile ducts (Fig. 6.55). Dilated intrahepatic biliary radicles appear as multiple,
P.208

round or linear branching structures, coursing toward the porta hepatis. The dilated left biliary system is often horizontal and linear, whereas the right biliary radicals often appear round or oval. The dilated common hepatic and common bile duct are seen as oval or tubular hypoattenuating structures near the porta hepatis or head of the pancreas.
Figure 6.55. Dilated biliary ducts. A: Contrast-enhanced CT scan through the dome of the liver shows dilated intrahepatic ducts (arrows), which appear as hypoattenuating tubular and circular structures surrounded by enhanced portal veins. Note that the dilated ducts are seen only on one side of the veins. B, C: CT scans at the level of the porta hepatis and pancreatic head, respectively, show a dilated common bile duct (arrow). The patient had a common bile duct stricture.
Studies in adults have shown that CT is about 96% sensitive for detecting the presence of biliary obstruction, 88% to 92% accurate for determining the level of obstruction, and 63% to 70% accurate for determining its cause (167,168). Similar results should be expected in children if careful attention is paid to patient preparation and CT technique.
Findings that help in the identifying the cause of biliary obstruction are evidence of choledocholithiasis (Fig. 6.56) and the appearance of the transition zone from a dilated to narrowed or obliterated duct (168,169). Gradual, smooth tapering of a dilated common bile duct is seen most often with benign disease, such as a stricture or pancreatitis. In contradistinction, abrupt termination of a dilated duct is most often a result of neoplasm, usually rhabdomyosarcoma (170) and lymphoma. Other CT features of rhabdomyosarcoma are a visible mass (Fig. 6.57) and invasion of surrounding vessels or adjacent retroperitoneal structures. The diagnosis of lymphoma is supported when there is adenopathy in the porta hepatis associated with widespread retroperitoneal or mesenteric adenopathy or involvement of other organs.
Beading, defined as alternating regions of ductal dilatation and stenosis on the same CT section, and skip dilatation, defined as dilated ducts that lack connection with other dilated ducts on contiguous sections are suggestive but not specific for the diagnosis of sclerosing cholangitis. These findings can be present in other benign processes and also in malignant processes causing biliary obstruction (171).
A potential pitfall in the diagnosis of intrahepatic biliary dilatation is hypoattenuating periportal fluid. The
P.209

difference between these two abnormalities is that perivascular fluid tends to completely surround the veins (Fig. 6.58), whereas dilated ducts are usually seen around only one wall of the portal venules (Fig. 6.55).
Figure 6.56. Obstruction owing to common bile duct stone. CT scan through the pancreatic head reveals a high-attenuation stone (arrowhead) in the distal common bile duct.
Choledochal Cyst
Choledochal cyst is a congenital dilatation of the extrahepatic or intrahepatic biliary tree (172,173). The diagnosis is made in 30% of patients in the first year of life, in 50% between 1 and 10 years of age, and in 20% in the second decade or later. The classic clinical presentation is jaundice, abdominal pain, and mass, although this triad is present in only 20% to 50% of patients. The most likely cause of choledochal cyst is an anomalous junction of the pancreatic and distal common bile ducts, which allows reflux of pancreatic enzymes into the biliary tree, leading to inflammation, weakening of the ductal wall, and progressive dilatation (173,174).
Figure 6.57. Rhabdomyosarcoma. Contrast-enhanced CT scan shows a large soft tissue mass (black arrows) in the porta hepatis. The tumor compressed the common bile duct, causing biliary obstruction. GB, dilated gallbladder. White arrows, dilated bile ducts.
Figure 6.58. Periportal edema. Contrast-enhanced CT shows hypoattenuating fluid (arrows) circumferentially surrounding the portal vein. The periportal edema in this trauma patient was the consequence of intravenous hydration. By comparison, dilated ducts are present on only one side of the vein.
Five types of choledochal cysts have been described (Fig. 6.59) (173,175). Type I choledochal cyst (80% to 90% of cysts) is subdivided into type 1A, cystic dilatation, type 1B, focal segmental dilatation, and type 1C, fusiform dilatation of the common bile duct. The type II cyst (2%) is a true diverticulum of the common bile duct. The type III cyst, also known as choledochocele (1% to 5%), is a cystic dilatation of the intraduodenal portion of the common duct. The type IV choledochal cyst (10%) is subdivided into types IVA, dilatation of intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts, and type IVB, multiple cystic dilatations of the extrahepatic bile ducts. Type V choledochal cysts, also known as Caroli disease, consist of cystic dilatation of the intrahepatic bile ducts.
Complications associated with choledochal cysts include cholelithiasis, choledocholithiasis, ascending cholangitis, intrahepatic abscesses, biliary cirrhosis, portal hypertension, and hepatobiliary malignancy, usually adenocarcinoma. The risk of malignancy increases with age (172,176).
The role of CT in the evaluation of choledochal cysts is to delineate the anatomy of the cyst and determine its relationship to the intrahepatic and extrahepatic biliary tree. At
P.210

CT, choledochal cyst appears as a fluid-filled structure in contiguity with the extrahepatic bile duct and separate from the gallbladder (Fig. 6.60). The left and right main hepatic ducts may be dilated, but more peripheral ductal dilatation, typical of acquired obstruction, is absent. Coronal images, using multiplanar or 3D reformations, are helpful for determining the course and extent of the dilated duct and its relationship to surrounding structures. Choledochocele appears as a fluid-filled cyst that protrudes into the duodenal lumen (177). Unlike the other types of choledochal cysts, this abnormality has no increased risk of malignancy.
Figure 6.59. Todani's classification scheme of choledochal cysts. (Reproduced from
Todani T, Watanabe Y, Narusue M, et al. Congenital bile duct cysts: classification, operative procedures, and review of thirty-seven cases including cancer arising from choledochal cyst. Am J Surg 1977;134:263–269, with permission.
) See text for detailed description.
Caroli Disease
Caroli disease, also known as congenital cystic dilation of the intrahepatic biliary tract, is characterized by saccular or fusiform dilatation of the intrahepatic biliary tree. Two forms have been described. One form is characterized by ductal dilatation and increased frequency of calculus formation and cholangitis. The other form is hereditary and is associated with hepatic fibrosis, which leads to cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Both forms may be associated with renal cystic disease, including renal tubular ectasia, cortical cysts, and autosomal recessive polycystic disease (178). Patients with Caroli disease have an increased risk of developing cholangiocarcinoma.
At CT, Caroli disease is seen as multiple tubular and saccular cystic structures (Fig. 6.61). Associated findings include bridging of the bile duct walls, causing the cystic dilatations to appear septated, and the central dot sign (179,180). The latter sign is characterized by a central enhancing focus in the dependent portion of the dilated bile duct. Pathologically, the dot has been shown to represent portal venous radicles that are enveloped by, but not actually inside of, the dilated bile ducts (179). The extrahepatic bile ducts in patients with Caroli disease can be normal, narrowed, slightly dilated, or associated with a choledochal cyst.
Caroli disease needs to be differentiated from polycystic liver disease and Byler disease. The cystic spaces in Caroli disease have an irregular shape and communicate with the dilated biliary tree. The cysts in cystic liver disease associated with polycystic renal disease and in Byler disease do not communicate with the bile ducts. In addition, the cysts in polycystic liver disease have a round rather than irregular shape. However, a definite diagnosis may require tissue sampling.
P.211

Figure 6.60. Choledochal cyst. Axial CT scan (A) and coronal multiplanar reformation (B) show a markedly enlarged common bile duct (C) and a separate gallbladder (GB).
Biliary Complications following Liver Transplantation
As noted above, biliary drainage in living donor transplantation is usually via a biliary-enteric anastomosis, whereas in a cadaveric transplant, the donor bile duct may be anastomosed to the recipient common duct or to a loop of small bowel. Both procedures have similar postoperative complications.
The most common biliary complications are stenosis or stricture at the anastomotic site and bile duct leaks (181,182). Bile leaks often occur early, whereas strictures may occur months following surgery. CT findings of bile duct leak include a focal fluid collection in the liver hilum and ascites. Dilatation of the bile ducts should suggest biliary stenosis. Biliary necrosis, owing to acute hepatic arterial occlusion, is a rare complication of liver transplantation. Biliary necrosis may result in bile leak or abscess formation (183,184).
Figure 6.61. Caroli disease. A, B: Two axial contrast-enhanced CT scans show tubular and saccular enlargement of numerous intrahepatic ducts. Also note a small amount of ascites.
An unusual cause of biliary obstruction is a mucocele of the remnant of the donor or recipient cystic duct. The blind-ending cystic duct remnant becomes distended with retained mucus and compresses the common hepatic duct. The ducts proximal to the mucocele become dilated. CT shows a well-defined, fluid-filled mass in the porta
P.212

hepatis, adjacent to the common hepatic duct, and dilated ducts (185).
Gallbladder Disease
Although CT is not widely used for evaluating children with suspected or known gallbladder disease, it can be useful to confirm or further delineate an abnormality detected with sonography. In addition, CT may reveal incidental congenital anomalies, cholelithiasis, or gallbladder wall thickening or edema during studies performed for other reasons.
Congenital Anomalies
Congenital anomalies of the gallbladder include variations in number, ectopic location, and an abnormal configuration (186). Anomalies in number include agenesis and duplication. Ectopic sites are under the left hepatic lobe, intrahepatic, retrohepatic, and retroperitoneal. Variations in configuration include kinking or folding of the gallbladder; phrygian cap, characterized by folding of the gallbladder fundus; and partial or complete septation.
Cholelithiasis
The incidence of gallstones in the pediatric population is approximately 1.5%. Cholelithiasis in children has been associated with furosemide therapy, cystic fibrosis, malabsorption, total parenteral nutrition, Crohn disease, bowel resection, and hemolytic anemia. About 85% of children and adolescents have an underlying disease predisposing to stone formation (187). In the remaining patients, calculus formation is idiopathic.
Gallbladder calculi can appear hyperattenuating, isoattenuating, or hypoattenuating relative to bile or surrounding soft tissues. Calcium bilirubinate and most mixed stones containing calcium are seen on CT as high-attenuation foci within the gallbladder (Fig. 6.62). Pure cholesterol stones have a CT attenuation value close to that of fat and appear as filling defects within the bile. The CT demonstration of gallstones is more dependent on the composition of the stones than their size. Other causes of high-attenuation intraluminal bile include biliary sludge, milk of calcium bile, hemobilia, pus, and inflammatory debris.
Gallbladder Wall Thickening
Gallbladder wall thickening in children has been associated with hypoproteinemia, pancreatitis, hepatitis, portal hypertension, and AIDS cholangiopathy (188). The CT features of gallbladder wall thickening are wall edema and mucosal enhancement (Fig. 6.40). In some patients with inflammatory gallbladder wall thickening, CT may show enhancement of the adjacent liver. The differential diagnosis of gallbladder wall edema is pericholecystic fluid. Pericholecystic fluid only partially surrounds the gallbladder and is not associated with mucosal enhancement.
Figure 6.62. Cholelithiasis. A densely calcified calcium bilirubinate stone (arrow) is present in the dependent part of the gallbladder. The striated renal parenchyma is the result of pyelonephritis.
Acute cholecystitis is rare in children. CT findings of acute calculous cholecystitis include gallbladder distention, wall thickening (>3 mm), stones in the gallbladder or cystic duct, pericholecystic fluid, inflammatory change in the pericholecystic fat, and increased attenuation of the bile (>20 HU) caused by intraluminal pus, blood, or cellular debris. The CT findings of acalculous cholecystitis are identical except that stones are absent.
References
1. Jabra AA, Fishman EK, Taylor GA. Hepatic masses in infants and children: CT evaluation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992;158:143–149.
2. Pobiel RS, Bisset GS III. Pictorial essay: imaging of liver tumors in the infant and child. Pediatr Radiol 1995;25:495–506.
3. Siegel M. Pediatric liver imaging. Semin Liver Dis 2001;21: 251–269.
4. Dodds WJ, Erickson SJ, Taylor AJ, et al. Caudate lobe of the liver: anatomy, embryology, and pathology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990;154:87–93.
5. Goldsmith M, Woodburne R. Surgical anatomy pertaining to liver resection. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1957;141:429–437.
6. Bismuth H. Surgical anatomy and anatomical surgery of the liver. World J Surg 1982;6:3–9.
7. Soyer P. Segmental anatomy of the liver: utility of a nomenclature accepted worldwide. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993;161: 572–573.
8. Langham MR Jr, Hemming AW. Surgical liver disease. In: Oldham KT, Colombani PM, Foglia RP, Skinner MA, eds. Principles and Practice of Pediatric Surgery. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005:1459–1473.
9. Mukai JK, Stack CM, Turner DA, et al. Imaging of surgically relevant hepatic vascular and segmental anatomy. Part I. Normal anatomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987;149:287–292.
P.213

10. Gazelle GS, Haaga JR. Hepatic neoplasms: surgically relevant segmental anatomy and imaging techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992;158:1015–1018.
11. Michels NA. Normal anatomy of the liver and its variant blood supply and collateral circulation. Am J Surg 1966;112: 337–347.
12. Jones AL, LaBrecque DR. Morphology of the liver. In: Gitnick G, LaBrecque DR, Moody FG, eds. Diseases of the Liver and Biliary Tract. St. Louis, MO: Mosby–Year Book; 1992:7–24.
13. Heiken JP, Menias CO. Liver. In: Lee JKT, Sagel SS, Stanley RJ, et al., eds. Computed Body Tomography with MRI Correlation. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006: 829–931.
14. Belton RL, Van Zandt TF. Congenital absence of the left lobe of the liver: a radiographic diagnosis. Radiology 1983;147: 184–187.
15. Champetier J, Yver R, Letoublon C, et al. A general review of anomalies of hepatic morphology and their clinical implications. Anat Clin 1985;7:285–299.
16. Radin DR, Colletti PM, Ralls PW, et al. Agenesis of the right hepatic lobe of the liver. Radiology 1987;164:639–642.
17. Auh YH, Rubenstein WA, Zirinsky K, et al. Accessory fissures of the liver: CT and sonographic appearance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1984;143:565–572.
18. Siegel MJ. Pediatric applications. In: Lee JKT, Sagel SS, Stanley RJ, et al., eds. Computed Body Tomography with MRI Correlation. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006:1727–1791.
19. Bonaldi VM, Bret PM, Reinhold C, et al. Helical CT of the liver: value of an early hepatic arterial phase. Radiology 1995;197:357–363.
20. Hollett MD, Jeffrey RB, Murcia-Nino M, et al. Dual-phase helical CT of the liver: value of arterial phase scans in the detection of small (<1.5 cm) malignant hepatic neoplasms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995;164:879–884.
21. Miller FH, Butler RS, Hoff FL, et al. Using triphasic helical CT to detect focal hepatic lesions in patients with neoplasms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;171:643–649.
22. Van Hoe L, Baert AL, Gryspeerdt S, et al. Dual-phase helical CT of the liver: value of an early-phase acquisition in the differential diagnosis of noncystic focal lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;168:1185–1192.
23. Chambers TP, Baron RL, Lush RM. Hepatic CT enhancement, Part I: alterations in the volume of contrast material within the same patients. Radiology 1994;193:513–517.
24. Chambers TP, Baron RL, Lush RM. Hepatic CT enhancement, Part II: alterations in contrast material volume and rate of injection within the same patients. Radiology 1994;193:518–522.
25. Mueller BU, Lopez-Terrada D, Finegold MJ. Tumors of the liver. In: Pizzo PA, Poplack DG, eds. Principles and Practice of Pediatric Oncology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006:887–904.
26. Ishak KG, Goodman Z, Stocker JT. Tumors of the liver and intrahepatic bile ducts. In: Atlas of Tumor Pathology. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology; 2001.
27. Stocker J, Conran R, Selby D. Tumor and pseudotumors of the liver. In: Stocker J, Askin F, eds. Pathology of Solid Tumors in Children. London: Chapman & Hakk; 1998:83–110.
28. Stocker JT. Hepatic tumors in children. Clin Liver Dis 2001;5:259–281.
29. Boechat MI, Kangarloo H, Gilsanz V. Hepatic masses in children. Semin Roentgenol 1988;3:185–189.
30. Boechat MI, Kangarloo H, Ortega J, et al. Primary liver tumors in children: comparison of CT and MR imaging. Radiology 1988;169:727–732.
31. Davey MS, Cohen MD. Imaging of gastrointestinal malignancy in childhood. Radiol Clin North Am 1996;34:717–742.
32. Dachman AH, Pakter RL, Ros PR, et al. Hepatoblastoma: radiologic-pathologic correlation in 50 cases. Radiology 1987;164:15–19.
33. Chen W-P, Chen J-H, Hwang J-I, et al. Spectrum of transient hepatic attenuation differences in biphasic helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;172:419–424.
34. Chen JC, Chen CC, Chen WJ, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma in children: clinical review and comparison with adult cases. J Pediatr Surg 1998;33:1350–1354.
35. Ni Y-H, Chang M-H, Hsu H-Y, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma in childhood: clinical manifestations and prognosis. Cancer 1991;68:1737–1741.
36. Stevens WR, Gulino SP, Batts KP, et al. Mosaic pattern of hepatocellular carcinoma: histologic basis for a characteristic CT appearance. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1996;20:337–342.
37. Fernandez MP, Redvanly RD. Primary hepatic malignant neoplasms. Radiol Clin North Am 1998;36:333–348.
38. Letourneau JG, Steely JW, Crass JR, et al. Upper abdomen: CT findings following partial hepatectomy. Radiology 1988;166:139–140.
39. Brandt DJ, Johnson CD, Stephens DH, Weiland LH. Imaging of fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988;151:295–299.
40. Ichikawa T, Federle MP, Grazioli L, et al. Fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma: imaging and pathologic findings in 31 recent cases. Radiology 1999;213:352–361.
41. Soyer P, Roche A, Levesque M, et al. CT of fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1991;15: 533–538.
42. Stevens WR, Johnson CD, Stephens DH, et al. Fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinomas: stage at presentation and results of aggressive surgical management. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995;164:1153–1158.
43. Titlebaum DS, Burke DR, Menanze SG, et al. Fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma: pitfalls in nonoperative diagnosis. Radiology 1988;167:25–30.
44. McLarney JK, Rucker PT, Bender GN, et al. Fibrolamellar carcinoma of the liver: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 1999;19:453–471.
45. Buetow PC, Buck JL, Pantongrag-Brown L, et al. Undif-ferentiated (embryonal) sarcoma of the liver: pathologic basis of imaging findings in 28 cases. Radiology 1997; 203:779–783.
46. Ros PR, Olmsted WW, Dachman AH, et al. Undifferentiated (embryonal) sarcoma of the liver: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 1986;160:141–145.
47. Pickhardt PJ, Siegel MJ. Abdominal manifestations of posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;171:1007–1013.
48. Pickhardt PJ, Siegel MJ. Posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder of the abdomen: CT evaluation in 51 patients. Radiology 1999;213:73–78.
49. Pickhardt PJ, Siegel MJ, Hayashi RJ, et al. State of the art. Posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder in children: clinical, histopathologic and imaging features: Radiology 2000;16–25.
50. Keslar PJ, Buck JL, Selby DM. Infantile hemangioendothelioma of the liver revisited. Radiographics 1993;13:657–670.
51. Dachman AH, Lichtenstein JE, Friedman AC, et al. Infantile hemangioendothelioma of the liver: a radiologic-pathologic-clinical correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1983;140: 1091–1096.
52. Dehner LP. Hepatic tumors in the pediatric age group: a distinctive clinicopathologic spectrum. Perspect Pediatr Pathol 1978:4:217–268.
53. Donaldson JS. Hemangioendothelioma of the liver. In: Siegel BA, Proto AV, eds. Pediatric Disease (Fourth Series) Test and Syllabus. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 1993: 436–462.
54. Roos JE, Pfiffner R, Stallmach T, et al. Infantile hemangioendothelioma. Radiographics 2002;23:1649–1655.
55. Leary DL, Weiskittel DA, Blane CE, et al. Follow-up imaging of benign pediatric liver tumors. Pediatr Radiol 1989;19: 234–236.
56. White CW. Treatment of hemangiomatosis with recombinant interferon alfa. Semin Hematol 1990;27:15–22.
P.214

57. Fellows KE, Hoffer FA, Markowitz RI, et al. Multiple collaterals to hepatic infantile hemangioendotheliomas and arteriovenous malformations: effect on embolization. Radiology 1991;181:813–818.
58. Freeny PC, Marks WM. Hepatic hemangioma: dynamic bolus CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1986;147:711–719.
59. Quinn SF, Benjamin GG. Hepatic cavernous hemangiomas: simple diagnostic sign with dynamic bolus CT. Radiology 1992;182:545–548.
60. Leslie DF, Johnson CD, MacCarty RL, et al. Single-pass CT of hepatic tumors: value of globular enhancement in distinguishing hemangiomas from hypervascular metastases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995;165:1403–1406.
61. Jang HJ, Choi BI, Kim TK, et al. Atypical small hemangiomas of the liver: “bright dot” sign at two-phase spiral CT. Radiology 1998;208:543–548.
62. Burrows PE, Dubois J, Kassarjian A. Pediatric hepatic vascular anomalies. Pediatr Radiol 2001;31:535–545.
63. DeMaioribus CA, Lally KP, Sim K, et al. Mesenchymal hamartoma of the liver. A 35-year review. Arch Surg 1990;125: 5948–6000.
64. de Chadarevian JP, Pawel BR, Faerber EN, et al. Undifferentiated (embryonal) sarcoma arising in conjunction with mesenchymal hamartoma of the liver. Mod Pathol 1994;7:490–493.
65. Lauwers GY, Grant LB, Donnelly WH, et al. Hepatic undifferentiated (embryonal) sarcoma arising in a mesenchymal hamartoma. Am J Surg Pathol 1997;21:1248–1254.
66. Stanley P, Hall TR, Woolley MM, et al. Mesenchymal hamartomas of the liver in childhood: sonographic and CT findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1986;147:1035–1039.
67. Giyanani VL, Meyers PC, Wolfson JJ. Mesenchymal hamartoma of the liver: computed tomography and ultrasonography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1986;10:51–54.
68. Howell RR, Stevenson RE, Ben-Menacehm Y, et al. Hepatic adenomata with type 1 glycogen storage disease. JAMA 1976;2326:1481–1484.
69. Buetow PC, Pantongrag-Brown L, Buck JL, et al. Focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 1996;16:369–388.
70. Carlson SK, Johnson CD, Bender CE, et al. CT of focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174:705–712.
71. Kamel IR, Liapi E, Fishman EK. Focal nodular hyperplasia; lesion evaluation using 16-MDCT and 3D CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186:15887–1596.
72. Caseiro-Alves F, Zins M, Mahfouz AE, et al. Calcification in focal nodular hyperplasia: a new problem for differentiation from fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiology 1996;198:889–892.
73. Brancatelli G, Federle MP, Katyal S, et al. Hemodynamic characterization of focal nodular hyperplasia using three-dimensional volume-rendered multidetector CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:81–85.
74. Grazioli L, Federle MP, Brancatelli G, et al. Hepatic adenomas: imaging and pathologic findings. Radiographics 2001; 21:877–892.
75. Ichikawa T, Federle MP, Grazioli L, et al. Hepatocellular adenoma: multiphasic CT and histopathologic findings in 25 patients. Radiology 2000;214:861–868.
76. Brisse H, Servois V, Bouche B, et al. Hepatic regenerating nodule: a mimic of recurrent cancer in children. Pediatr Radiol 2000;30:386–393.
77. Murphy BJ, Casillas J, Ros PR, et al. The CT appearance of cystic masses of the liver. Radiographics 1989;9:307–322.
78. Herman TE, Siegel MJ. Central dot sign on CT of liver cysts. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1990;14:1019–1021.
79. Chusid MJ. Pyogenic hepatic abscess in infancy and childhood. Pediatrics 1978;62:554–559.
80. Mathieu D, Vasile N, Fagniez PL, et al. Dynamic CT features of hepatic abscesses. Radiology 1985;154:749–752.
81. Jeffrey RB, Tolentino CS, Chang FC, et al. CT of small pyogenic hepatic abscesses: the cluster sign. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988;151:487–489.
82. Hopkins KL, Simoneaus SF, Patrick LE, et al. Imaging manifestations of cat-scratch disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;166:435–438.
83. VanSonnenberg E, Mueller PR, Schiffman HR, et al. Intrahepatic amebic abscesses: indications for and results of percutaneous catheter drainage. Radiology 1985;156: 631–635.
84. Radin DR, Ralls PW, Colletti PM, et al. CT of amebic liver abscess. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988;150:1297–1301.
85. Pastakia B, Shawker TH, Thaler M, et al. Hepatosplenic candidiasis: wheels within wheels. Radiology 1988;166:417–421.
86. Shirkhoda A. CT findings in hepatosplenic and renal candidiasis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1987;11:795–798.
87. Berlow ME, Spirit BA, Weil L. CT follow-up of hepatic and splenic fungal microabscesses. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1984; 8:42–45.
88. Francis IR, Glazer GM, Amendola MA, et al. Hepatic abscesses in the immunocompromised patient: role of CT in detection, diagnosis, management, and follow-up. Gastrointest Radiol 1986;11:257–262.
89. Shirkhoda A, Lopez-Berestein G, Holbert JM, et al. Hepatosplenic fungal infection: CT and pathologic evaluation after treatment with liposomal amphotericin B. Radiology 1986;159:349–353.
90. Beggs I. The radiology of hydatid disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1985;145:639–648.
91. Kalovidouris A, Pissiotis C, Pontifex G, et al. CT characterization of multivesicular hydatid cysts. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1986;10:428–431.
92. Pandolfo I, Blandino G, Scribano E, et al. CT findings in hepatic involvement by echinococcus granulosus. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1984;8:839–845.
93. Pedrosa I, Saiz A, Arrazola J, et al. Hydatid disease: radiologic and pathologic features and complications. Radiographics 2000;20:795–817.
94. Bret PM, Fond A, Bretagnolle M, et al. Percutaneous aspiration and drainage of hydatid cysts in the liver. Radiology 1988;168:617–620.
95. Khuroo MS, Zargar SA, Mahajan R. Echinococcus granulosus cysts in the liver: management with percutaneous drainage. Radiology 1991;180:141–145.
96. Czermak BV, Unsinn KM, Gotwald T, et al. Echinoccus multilocularis revisited. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:1207–1212.
97. Didier D, Weiler S, Rohmer P, et al. Hepatic alveolar echinococcosis: correlative US and CT study. Radiology 1985;154:179–186.
98. Proietti S, Abdelmoumene A, Genevay M, et al. Echinococcal cyst. Radiographics 2004;24:861–865.
99. Mortele KJ, Segatto E, Ros PR. The infected liver: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 2004;24:937–955.
100. Gholson CF, Bacon BR. Metabolic and systemic diseases. In: Gitnick G, LaBrecque DR, Moody FG, eds. Diseases of the Liver and Biliary Tract. St. Louis, MO: Mosby–Year Book; 1992:489–523.
101. Kammen BF, Pacharn P, Thoeni RF, et al. Focal fatty infiltration of the liver: analysis of prevalence and CT findings in children and young adults. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177:1035–1039.
102. Gerety BM. Hemochromatosis. In: Freeny PC, Stevenson GW, eds. Alimentary Tract Radiology. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 1994:1560–665.
103. Chezmar JL, Nelson RC, Malko JA, et al. Hepatic iron overload: diagnosis and quantification by noninvasive imaging. Gastrointest Radiol 1990;15:27–31.
104. Guyader D, Gandon Y, Deugnier Y, et al. Evaluation of computed tomography in the assessment of liver iron overload. Gastroenterology 1989;97:737–743.
105. Aihara T, Fujikoa M, Yamamoto K. Increased CT density of the liver due to cis-diaminedichloro platinum (II). Pediatr Radiol 1987;17:75–76.
P.215

106. Dwyer A, Doppman JL, Adams AJ, et al. Influence of glycogen on liver density: computed tomography from a metabolic perspective. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1983;7:70–73.
107. Doppman JL, Cornblath M, Dwyer AJ, et al. Computed tomography of the liver and kidneys in glycogen storage disease. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1982;6:67–71.
108. Limmer J, Fleig WE, Leupold D, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma in type I glycogen storage disease. Hepatology 1988; 8:531–537.
109. Bianchi L. Glycogen storage disease I and hepatocellular tumours. Eur J Pediatr 1993;152(suppl 1):S63–70.
110. Franco LM, Krishnamurthy V, Bali D, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma in glycogen storage disease type Ia: a case series. J Inherit Metab Dis 2005;28:153–162.
111. Kelly PM, Poon FW. Hepatic tumours in glycogen storage disease type 1 (von Gierke's disease). Clin Radiol 2001; 56:505–508.
112. Dixon AK, Walshe JM. Computed tomography of the liver in Wilson disease. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1984;8:46–49.
113. Mayer DP, Kressel HY, Soloway RS. Asymptomatic carrier state in Wilson's disease. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1983;7: 146–147.
114. De Groote J, Desmet VJ, Gedigk P, et al. A classification of chronic hepatitis. Lancet 1994;2:626–628.
115. Popper H. Pathologic aspects of cirrhosis. A review. Am J Pathol 1977;87:228–264.
116. Itai Y, Sekiyama K, Ahmadi T, et al. Fulminant hepatic failure: observation with serial CT. Radiology 1997;202:379–382.
117. Day DL, Letourneau JG, Allan BT, et al. Hepatic regenerating nodules in hereditary tyrosinemia. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987;149:391–393.
118. Dubois J, Garel L, Patriquin H, et al. Imaging features of type 1 hereditary tyrosinemia: a review of 30 patients. Pediatr Radiol 1996;26:845–851.
119. Zetterman RK. Cirrhosis of the liver. In: Gitnick G, LaBrecque DR, Moody FG, eds. Diseases of the Liver and Biliary Tract. St. Louis, MO: Mosby–Year Book; 1992:447–466.
120. Zetterman RK. Complications of cirrhosis. In: Gitnick G, LaBrecque DR, Moody FG, eds. Diseases of the Liver and Biliary Tract. St. Louis, MO: Mosby–Year Book; 1992: 467–487.
121. Brown JJ, Naylor MJ, Yagan N. Imaging of hepatic cirrhosis. Radiology 1997;202:1–16.
122. Torres WE, Whitmire LF, Gedgaudas-McClees K, et al. Computed tomography of hepatic morphologic changes in cirrhosis of the liver. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1986;10:47–50.
123. Waller RM III, Oliver TW Jr, McCain AH, et al. Computed tomography and sonography of hepatic cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Radiographics 1984;4:677–715.
124. Giorgio A, Amoroso P, Lettieri G, et al. Cirrhosis: value of caudate to right lobe ratio in diagnosis with US. Radiology 1986;161:443–445.
125. Murakami T, Mochizuki K, Nakamura H. Imaging of the cirrhotic liver. Semin Liver Dis 2001;21:213–224.
126. Bosch J, D'Amico G, García-Pagán JC. Portal hypertension and nonsurgical management. In: Schiff ER, Sorell MF, Maddrey WC, eds. Schiff', Diseases of the Liver. 10th edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007:419–495.
127. Freeny PC. Portal venous system. In: Freeny PC, Stevenson GW, eds. Alimentary Tract Radiology. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 1994:1566–1603.
128. Cho KC, Patel YD, Wachsberg RH, et al. Varices in portal hypertension: evaluation with CT. Radiographics 1995;15: 609–622.
129. Slovis TL, Haller JO, Cohen HL, et al. Complicated appendiceal inflammatory disease in children: pylephlebitis and liver abscess. Radiology 1989;171:823–825.
130. Marn CS, Francis IR. CT of portal venous occlusion. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992;159:717–726.
131. Itai Y, Hachiya J, Makita K, et al. Transient hepatic attenuation differences on dynamic computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1987;11:461–465.
132. Mathieu D, Vasile N. Menu Y, Van Beers B, et al. Budd-Chiari syndrome: dynamic CT. Radiology 1987;165:409–413.
133. Mori H, Maeda H, Fukuda T, et al. Acute thrombosis of the inferior vena cava and hepatic veins in patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome: CT demonstration. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989;153:987–991.
134. Murphy FB, Steinberg HV, Shires TG III, et al. The Budd-Chiari syndrome: a review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1986;147:9–15.
135. Stanley P. Budd-Chiari syndrome. Radiology 1989;170: 625–627.
136. Benya EC, Sivit CH, Quinones RR. Abdominal complications after bone marrow transplantation in children: sonographic and CT findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993; 161:1023–1027.
137. Mauro MA, Stackhouse DJ, Parker LA, et al. Computed tomography of hepatic venous hypertension: the reticulated-mosaic pattern. Gastrointest Radiol 1990;15:35–38.
138. Holley HC, Koslin DB, Berland LL, et al. Inhomogeneous enhancement of liver parenchyma secondary to passive congestion: contrast-enhanced CT. Radiology 1989;170: 795–800.
139. Moulton JS, Miller BL, Dodd GD III, et al. Passive hepatic congestion in heart failure: CT abnormalities. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988;151:939–942.
140. Koslin DB, Stanley RJ, Berland LL, et al. Hepatic perivascular lymphedema: CT appearance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988;150:111–113.
141. Holbert BL, Baron RL, Dodd GD. Hepatic infarction caused by arterial insufficiency: spectrum and evolution of CT findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;166:815–820.
142. Lev-Toaff AS, Friedman AC, Cohen LM, et al. Hepatic infarcts: new observations by CT and sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987;149:87–90.
143. Maves CK, Caron KH, Bisset GS III, et al. Splenic and hepatic peliosis: MR findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992; 158:75–76.
144. Radin DR, Kanel GC. Peliosis hepatis in a patient with human immunodeficiency virus infection. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991;156:91–92.
145. Steinke K, Terraciano L, Wiesner W. Unusual cross-sectional imaging findings in hepatic peliosis. Eur Radiol 2003;13:1916–1919.
146. Kleinig P, Davies RP, Maddern G, et al. Peliosis hepatis: central “fast surge” ultrasound enhancement and multislice CT appearances. Clin Radiol 2003;58:995–998.
147. Unger EC, Lee JKT, Weyman PJ. CT and MR imaging of radiation hepatitis. J Comput Assist Tomorgr 1987;11:264–268.
148. Tanaka K, Uemoto S, Tokunaga Y, et al. Living related liver transplantation in children. Am J Surg 1994;168:41–48.
149. Unsinn KM, Freund MC, Ellemunter H, et al. Spectrum of imaging findings after pediatric liver transplantation, Part I: posttransplantation anatomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:1133–1138.
150. Ametani F, Itoh K, Shibata T, et al. Spectrum of CT findings in pediatric patients after partial liver transplantation. Radiographics 2001;21:55–63.
151. Berrocal T, Parron M, Alvarez-Luque A, et al. Pediatric liver transplantation: a pictorial essay of early and late complications. Radiographics 2006;26:1187–1209.
152. Dupuy D, Costello P, Lewis D, Jenkins R. Abdominal findings after liver transplantation in 66 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991;156:1167–1170.
153. Brancatelli G, Katyal S, Federele M, et al. Three-dimensional multislice computed tomography with the volume rendering technique in the detection of vascular complications after liver transplantation. Transplantation 2002;73:237–242.
154. Katyal S, Oliver JH 3rd, Buck DG, et al. Detection of vascular complications after liver transplantation: early experience in multislice CT angiography with volume rendering. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:1735–1739.
155. Quiroga S, Sebastia MC, Margarit C, et al. Complications of orthotopic liver transplantation: spectrum of findings with helical CT. Radiographics 2001;21:1085–1102.
156. Unsinn KM, Freund MC, Ellemunter H, et al. Spectrum of imaging findings after pediatric liver transplantation, Part 2: posttransplantation complications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:1139–1144.
P.216

157. Abécassis J-P, Parienté D, Hazebroucq V, et al. Subcapsular hepatic necrosis in liver transplantation: CT appearance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991;156:981–983.
158. Feld R, Wechsler RJ, Dumsha JZ, et al. Significance of the computed tomography finding of subcapsular hepatic necrosis in liver transplantation. Abdom Imaging 1996;21: 161–165.
159. Stevens SD, Heiken JP, Brunt E, et al. Low-attenuation periportal collar in transplanted liver is not reliable CT evidence of acute allograft rejection. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991; 157:1195–1198.
160. Kaplan SB, Sumkin JH, Campbell WL, et al. Periportal low-attenuation areas on CT: value as evidence of liver transplant rejection. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989;152:285–287.
161. Meyer JI, Khalil R, Remer EM. Periportal low attenuation due to hepatic necrosis in a patient after liver transplant. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;167:98–99.
162. Jonas MM, Perez-Atayde AR. Liver disease in infancy and childhood. In: Schiff ER, Sorrell MF, Maddrey WC, eds. Schiff's Diseases of the Liver. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007:1305–1347
163. Baron RL. Computed tomography of the biliary tree. Radiol Clin North Am 1991;29:1235–1250.
164. Hernanz-Schulman M, Ambrosino MM, Freeman PC, et al. Common bile duct in children: sonographic dimensions. Radiology 1995;195:193–195.
165. McGahan JP, Phillips HE, Cox KL. Sonography of the normal pediatric gallbladder and biliary tree. Radiology 1982;144:873–875.
166. Wolson AH. Ultrasound measurements of the gallbladder. In: Goldberg BB, Kurtz AB. Atlas of Ultrasound Measurements. Chicago: Year Book Medical; 1990:108–112.
167. Barakos JA, Ralls PW, Lapin SA, et al. Cholelithiasis: evaluation with CT. Radiology 1987;162:415–418.
168. Gibson RN, Yeung E, Thompson JN, et al. Bile duct obstruction: radiologic evaluation of level, cause, and tumor resectability. Radiology 1986;160:43–47.
169. Baron RL. Common bile duct stones: reassessment of criteria for CT diagnosis. Radiology 1987;162:419–424.
170. Roebuck DJ, Yang WT, Lam WWM, et al. Hepatobiliary rhabdomyosarcoma in children: diagnostic radiology. Pediatr Radiol 1998;28:101–108.
171. Teefey SA, Baron RL, Schulte SJ, et al. Patterns of intrahepatic bile duct dilatation at CT: correlation with obstructive disease processes. CT findings. Radiology 1992;182: 139–142.
172. Kim OH, Chung HJ, Choi BG. Imaging of the choledochal cyst. Radiographics 1995;15:69–88.
173. Savader SJ, Beneati JF, Venbrux AC, et al. Choledochal cysts: classification and cholangiographic appearance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991;156:327–331.
174. Babbitt DP. Congenital choledochal cyst: new etiologic concept based on anomalous relationships of common bile duct and pancreatic bulb. Ann Radiol (Paris) 1969:12:231–240.
175. Todani T, Watanabe Y, Narusue M, et al. Congenital bile duct cysts: classification, operative procedures, and review of thirty-seven cases including cancer arising from choledochal cyst. Am J Surg 1977;134:263–269.
176. Yoshida H, Itai Y, Minami M, et al. Biliary malignancies occurring in choledochal cysts. Radiology 1989;173:389–392.
177. Pollack M. Shirkhoda A, Charnsangavej C. Computed tomography of choledochocele. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1985;9:360–362.
178. Fulcher AS, Turner MA, Sanyal AJ. Case 38: Caroli disease and renal tubular ectasia. Radiology 2001;220:720–723.
179. Choi BI, Yeon KM, Kim SH, et al. Caroli disease: central dot sign in CT. Radiology 1990;174:161–163.
180. Levi AD, Rohrmann CA, Murakata LA, et al. Caroli's disease: radiologic spectrum with pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:1053–1057.
181. Letourneau JG, Hunter DW, Ascher NL, et al. Biliary complications after liver transplantation in children. Radiology 1989;170:1095–1099.
182. Letourneau JG, Hunter DW, Payne WD, et al. Imaging of and intervention for biliary complications after hepatic transplantation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990;154:729–733.
183. Hoffer FA, Teele RL, Lillehei CW, et al. Infected bilomas and hepatic artery thrombosis in infant recipients of liver transplants. Interventional radiology and medical therapy as an alternative to retransplantation. Radiology 1988;169: 435–338.
184. Kaplan SB, Zajko AB, Koneru B. Hepatic bilomas due to hepatic artery thrombosis in liver transplant recipients: percutaneous drainage and clinical outcome. Radiology 1990;174:1031–1035.
185. Zajko AB, Bennett MJ, Campbell WL, et al. Mucocele of the cystic duct remnant in eight liver transplant recipients: findings at cholangiography, CT, and US. Radiology 1990; 177:691–693.
186. Meilstrup JW, Hopper KD, Thieme GA. Imaging of gallbladder variants. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991;157:1205–1208.
187. Gilger MA. Diseases of the gallbladder. In: Wyllie R, Hyams JS, eds. Pediatric Gastrointestinal Disease. 2nd ed. Philadelphia. WB Saunders; 1999:651–662.
188. Teixidor HS, Godwin TA, Ramirez EA. Cryptosporidiosis of the biliary tract in AIDS. Radiology 1991;180:51–56.
2 stars Hamburg hotels