Editors: Siegel, Marilyn J.
Title: Pediatric Body CT, 2nd Edition
> Table of Contents > Chapter 8 - Gastrointestinal Tract
Chapter 8
Gastrointestinal Tract
Conventional barium studies remain superior to CT for evaluating the bowel lumen and mucosal surface, but they provide only limited data about intramural or extraintestinal abnormalities. Although CT can be used to detect intraluminal abnormalities, its major advantage over barium examinations is its ability to detect and characterize abnormalities of the bowel wall, contiguous soft tissues, and adjacent organs.
This chapter reviews the CT appearance of common gastrointestinal lesions in children. The techniques for examining individual areas of the alimentary tract are presented.
General Technique for Abdominal CT Studies
Adequate opacification and distention of the bowel lumen with oral contrast material is mandatory so that collapsed or unopacified bowel loops are not mistaken for mass lesions or wall thickening. The amount of contrast material varies with patient age (see Chapter 1). A volume of contrast material appropriate for age should be given orally or via nasogastric tube 45 to 60 minutes prior to the CT examination. An additional volume of contrast agent, usually equal to half that of the initial volume, should be administered just before scanning begins. Gas-producing crystals, water, and changing the patient's position to maximize gastrointestinal distension should be used when appropriate. Intravenous contrast material is helpful to assess the extent of inflammatory and neoplastic disease, demonstrate blood vessels, and evaluate the solid abdominal organs.
The patient is scanned in the supine position, and contiguous scans are obtained through the chest or abdomen. For a 16-row detector, 0.75- to 1.5-mm collimation with a pitch of 1 to 1.5 suffices. For a 64-row detector, 0.6- to 1.25-mm collimation and a pitch of 1 to 1.5 suffice. A 5-mm section thickness is usually adequate for routine viewing of the volumetric data. Thin (1- to 2-mm) reconstructions are used if multiplanar and 3D reconstructions are planned. (See Chapter 1 for more detailed discussion of techniques.)
Esophagus
Technique
Intravenous contrast medium is useful to evaluate mediastinal vessels and to identify varices. Administration of oral contrast medium is not routinely needed. In some patients, orally administered positive or negative (water) contrast material can be useful to achieve maximum esophageal distention, helping to differentiate the normal collapsed wall from a thickened wall and an esophageal mass from a mediastinal mass of other origin.
Normal Anatomy
The esophagus extends from the upper esophageal sphincter (cricopharyngeus muscle) to the lower esophageal sphincter, which is at the level of the diaphragmatic hiatus (1). On axial sections, it is seen as an oval or round soft tissue structure, often containing small amounts of intraluminal air. The thickness of the normal esophageal wall is ≤3 mm when the lumen is fully distended and ≤5 mm when the lumen is incompletely distended. The cervical esophagus lies in the midline posterior to the trachea. At the thoracic inlet, the esophagus courses slightly to the left of midline. It then descends to the left of the trachea, posterior to the left main-stem bronchus, and anterior to the descending aorta as it enters the diaphragmatic hiatus (Fig. 8.1) (1,2).
Findings of esophageal pathology are wall thickening, an air–fluid level, a fluid-filled lumen, and increased luminal diameter. These features suggest obstruction, gastrointestinal reflux, or esophageal motility disorder (Fig. 8.2).
Congenital Abnormalities
Duplication Cysts
Esophageal duplication cysts account for approximately 20% of all gastrointestinal tract duplications (3). They arise either from a diverticulum of the primitive foregut or from abnormal recanalization of the gut and are lined by
P.252

gastrointestinal epithelium. Most (60%) are located in the lower third of the esophagus, either within or adjacent to the esophageal wall, and they do not communicate with the esophageal lumen (4). Duplication cysts are detected as an incidental finding on CT or other imaging studies or because they cause dysphagia or dyspnea as a result of esophageal or airway compression. Approximately 50% of esophageal duplication cysts contain ectopic gastric mucosa, and in theses cases, gastric secretions can cause pain or hemoptysis as a result of peptic ulceration.
Figure 8.1. CT appearance of normal esophagus. A: At the thoracic inlet, the esophagus (arrow) lies to the left of the trachea (T). The lumen contains a small amount of air. B: At the level of the diaphragmatic hiatus, the esophagus (arrow) lies anterior to the aorta (A).
Esophageal duplication cysts appear on CT as well-circumscribed, thin-walled, fluid-filled spherical or tubular masses contiguous with the esophagus (Fig. 8.3). The attenuation value of the fluid contents is usually equal to that of water, but it can be higher if the fluid is hemorrhagic or proteinaceous. When the duplication cyst acquires a communication with the tracheobronchial tree, usually caused by peptic ulceration, air may be seen within the cyst lumen.
Figure 8.2. Achalasia. A, B: CT scans at the level of the aortic arch (AA) and through the lower thorax show a dilated, fluid-filled esophagus (E) with an air–fluid level, indicating distal obstruction. The esophageal wall is of normal thickness. Also seen is a small right pleural effusion.
Esophageal Atresia
Esophageal atresia is the result of error in differentiation of the esophagus from the trachea (4). It occurs at the junction of the upper and middle thirds of the esophagus.
P.253

Patients present at birth with excessive salivation or coughing and choking during attempts to feed. Although plain radiographs alone nearly always suffice for the diagnosis, CT can identify fistulous connections between the esophagus and trachea (5).
Figure 8.3. Esophageal duplication cyst. Axial (A) and coronal (B) reformatted images show a well-defined mass (M), with near-water-attenuation contents and thin walls, contiguous with the esophagus (arrow).
Neoplasia
Esophageal tumors are rare in children. Those that have been reported include leiomyoma, hamartoma, angiofibromatous polyp, carcinoma, and lymphoma (2,4). On CT, benign esophageal tumors appear as smooth, well-defined, round or ovoid, intraluminal or intramural masses of soft tissue attenuation. The esophageal wall is eccentrically thickened. Multiple leiomyomas have been associated with Alport syndrome (6). CT features of malignant tumors include irregular wall thickening, intraluminal polypoid mass, heterogeneous enhancement, invasion of adjacent soft tissues, regional lymph node enlargement, pleural effusion, and metastases to other organs.
Enlarged paratracheal and subcarinal lymph nodes, secondary to lymphoma, metastases, or infection, such as granulomatous diseases, can extrinsically compress or invade the esophagus (Fig. 8.4). CT findings range from individually enlarged lymph nodes of soft tissue attenuation to a large homogeneous mass obscuring normal fat planes. Esophageal invasion is suggested when there is thickening, spiculation. or ulceration of the wall. The CT appearance of malignant adenopathy is similar to that of adenopathy secondary to inflammation. Clinical correlation and/or biopsy are needed to establish a diagnosis.
Esophagitis
Esophagitis in the pediatric population is usually due to gastroesophageal reflux. Other causes include ingestion of caustic agents and oral medications, such as tetracycline or iron sulfate; long-standing foreign bodies; opportunistic infections, usually owing to Candida albicans,
P.254

Cytomegalovirus, or herpes virus; and systemic diseases, including Crohn disease, epidermolysis bullosa, graft versus host disease, and Behçet disease (genital and gastrointestinal ulcerations).
Figure 8.4. Esophageal compression secondary to extrinsic lymphadenopathy. CT scan at the level of the carina shows compression of the esophagus (arrow) by a partially calcified, low-attenuation mass. Biopsy showed fibrosing mediastinitis in this patient with dysphagia.
CT findings of esophagitis are long-segment, circumferential wall thickening (7). Mild to moderate wall thickening has been associated with reflux esophagitis (Fig. 8.5) and candidiasis, whereas more marked esophageal thickening has been described in Cytomegalovirus infection. A target appearance is seen when there is submucosal edema, which results in a hypoattenuating layer between the enhancing inner mucosa and outer muscularis propria. Esophagitis is easily diagnosed by barium studies or endoscopy. CT is used to detect or confirm the presence of complications, including ulcerations, perforation, and mediastinitis. CT findings cannot be used to predict a specific cause of esophagitis, and clinical or laboratory data are needed for diagnosis.
Esophageal Varices
Esophageal varices are usually a complication of portal hypertension and result from reversal of venous flow in the coronary veins into the distal esophageal veins. Less often, they are produced by superior vena caval obstruction, which results in the veins from the head and upper extremity draining into esophageal veins and the azygos vein. The former varices are termed uphill and the latter are termed downhill. On CT, varices appear as brightly enhancing, smoothly marginated, tubular or rounded structures in the periesophageal region (Fig. 8.6). The attenuation is similar to that of venous blood. Findings of cirrhosis and portal hypertension also may be noted.
Figure 8.5. Esophagitis. The esophageal wall is moderately thickened (arrows) causing esophageal compression. Mucosal ulceration was documented endoscopically. Cultures grew Candida albicans in this 19-month-old boy with acute myelogenous leukemia.
Figure 8.6. Esophageal varices. Contrast-enhanced CT at the level of the gastroesophageal junction demonstrates enhancing tubular structures (arrows) in close proximity to the esophagus (E). A, aorta.
Esophageal Foreign Bodies
In otherwise healthy children, swallowed foreign bodies lodge in the pharynx, proximal to the cricopharyngeal sphincter, or at the level of the thoracic inlet. In patients who have undergone repair of esophageal atresia, they lodge in the proximal esophagus at the site of surgical anastomosis. Plain radiographs and barium studies often suffice to establish the diagnosis. However, these studies are less likely to demonstrate small or only slightly radio-opaque foreign bodies. CT can readily show such foreign bodies (Fig. 8.7), as well as complications, such as esophageal perforation (Fig. 8.8) (8).
Achalasia
Achalasia is associated with absence or degeneration of the myenteric plexus of the distal esophagus. As a result, the lower esophageal sphincter fails to relax, causing distal obstruction. CT findings include a dilated, fluid- and food-filled esophagus (Fig. 8.2). Wall thickness is usually normal.
Esophageal Perforation
Esophageal perforation may result from foreign body aspiration, trauma, or instrumentation. Most tears occur in the cervical and upper thoracic esophagus. CT
P.255

findings include wall thickening, extraluminal mediastinal air, periesophageal fluid or contrast, and pleural effusion (Fig. 8.8).
Figure 8.7. Esophageal foreign body. Axial CT scan (A) and sagittal reformation (B) in a 2-year-old boy show an esophageal foreign body (F), a hotdog, in the upper esophagus resulting in tracheal (T) displacement and compression.
Stomach
Technique
Optimal examination of the stomach requires optimal luminal distention, as a collapsed gastric wall can mimic focal or diffuse wall thickening or obscure pathology. Administering positive oral contrast agent or negative contrast material, such as water or effervescent crystals (9,10,11), or positioning the patient in the prone position can help to ensure full gastric distention. Water used as a negative contrast agent is particularly valuable to improve visualization of the underlying gastric mucosa. Lesions of the gastric antrum, anterior wall, and lesser curvature are usually best seen when the patient is scanned in the supine position. The gastroesophageal junction, posterior gastric wall, and greater curvature are often better seen with the patient prone. After administration of intravenous contrast agent, scans are obtained in the portal venous phase of enhancement.
Anatomy
The stomach extends from the esophagogastric junction to the pylorus. The major regions of the stomach are the fundus (most proximal part), corpus (body), and antrum
P.256

(most distal part). The right side of the stomach is called the greater curvature and the left the lesser curvature. The stomach contains distinct folds called rugae, which appear thickest in the area of the greater curvature. The thickness of the normal gastric wall and rugal folds ranges between 3 and 5 mm. A thickness >5 mm is abnormal when the stomach is well distended (12). The gastric wall is usually homogeneous. The mucosa commonly shows bright enhancement following administration of intravenous contrast material.
Figure 8.8. Perforation secondary to esophageal foreign body. The margins of the esophagus (E) are irregular, and there is a paraesophageal gas collection (arrows) representing a walled-off perforation.
Abnormalities of Shape and Position
Lesions arising in structures adjacent to the stomach can cause extrinsic deformity or displacement of the stomach. Causes of extrinsic abnormality include splenic enlargement, retroperitoneal neoplasms, such as Wilms tumor or neuroblastoma, an enlarged left hepatic lobe owing to tumor or cirrhosis, and pancreatic pseudocyst.
Congenital Abnormalities
Duplication Cysts
Gastric duplication cysts account for approximately 5% of gastrointestinal tract duplications (3,13). They most commonly arise from the greater curvature or the pylorus. Histologically, they are lined by gastric mucosa and contain smooth muscle tissue in their walls. Like esophageal duplications, gastric cysts usually do not communicate with the lumen. In some cases, the cysts are adherent to the pancreas or communicate with aberrant pancreatic ducts (14). About 40% of gastric duplications contain ectopic pancreatic tissue. Clinical presentations include a palpable mass, pain or vomiting owing to gastric obstruction or to pancreatitis involving the ectopic tissue, and bleeding secondary to peptic ulceration of the gastric mucosa overlying the duplication cyst. CT shows a near-water-attenuation, thick-walled, spherical mass in close proximity to the gastric wall. The walls of the cyst may enhance after the administration of intravenous contrast agent (Fig. 8.9) (3,13).
Heterotopic Pancreas
Heterotopic pancreas may be asymptomatic or patients may present with abdominal pain from pancreatitis or bleeding. The ectopic tissue usually is 1 to 3 cm in diameter and is found along the greater curvature, close to the pyloric canal. On CT, it appears as an oval or round submucosal mass with smooth or serrated margins and an enhancement pattern similar to that of the pancreas (15).
Figure 8.9. Gastric duplication. CT reveals a water-attenuation mass (arrow) in close proximity to the pylorus (P). (Case courtesy of Armed Forces Institute of Pathology.)
Situs Anomalies
Situs solitus refers to a normal position of the abdominal structures. Situs inversus refers to a mirror-image pattern with the stomach, jejunum, and cardiac apex on the right and the liver on the left. Situs ambiguous refers to a configuration that is neither solitus nor inversus. (See Chapter 7 for more detail.)
Mass Lesions
Benign Neoplasia
Gastric tumors are rare in children. Benign tumors that have been reported include juvenile polyps, hamartomatous polyps (associated with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome), cystic teratoma, inflammatory pseudotumor, and leiomyoma. On CT, they appear as soft tissue–attenuation mucosal or intramural masses.
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are mesenchymal neoplasms that arise in the muscularis propria, do not contain smooth muscle cells, and typically express tyrosine kinase growth factor receptor (KIT) (16). They are differentiated from leiomyomas and leiomyosarcomas by the presence of KIT protein. GISTs usually involve the antrum and body, have a female predominance, and are benign (17,18). CT findings are as a large, intramural soft tissue–attenuation mass with an intraluminal and/or exophytic component. Peripheral or central contrast enhancement is common. Large tumors often show central areas of low attenuation from necrosis (Fig. 8.10).
Malignant Neoplasia
Malignant tumors include lymphoma, leiomyosarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, and adenocarcinoma (4).
P.257

The combination of gastric epithelioid leiomyosarcoma, pulmonary chondroma, and extra-adrenal paraganglioma has been termed Carney triad. On CT, gastric malignancies can appear as focal or diffuse irregular wall thickening (Fig. 8.11), a polypoid intraluminal mass, or a lobular exophytic mass. The attenuation is similar to that of skeletal muscle. Calcifications and surface ulcerations may be noted. Findings suggesting spread beyond the serosa include loss of surrounding fat planes, reticular soft tissue stranding into adjacent ligamentous structures or perigastric fat, and hepatic metastases.
Figure 8.10. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor. There is a large exophytic soft tissue mass (arrows) arising from the antrum (A) of the stomach, displacing the duodenum (D) anteriorly. The internal heterogeneity reflects areas of necrosis.
Figure 8.11. Gastric lymphoma, 3-year-old boy. The stomach (S) is distended with contrast medium and air, allowing visualization of the gastric wall. The dependent gastric wall (arrows) is thickened and nodular. Also seen is a mesenteric mass (M) representing tumor extension.
Bezoars
Trichobezoars (hair) are more common lesions in childhood than phytobezoars (vegetable matter). Phytobezoars are usually seen in older patients. Gastric bezoars present as an epigastric mass or tenderness, vomiting, early satiety, and weight loss. CT findings are a heterogeneous, intraluminal, soft tissue mass containing a mottled air pattern (19) (Fig. 8.12). Administration of water can be useful in confirming an intraluminal location.
Inflammatory and Infectious Gastritis
Helicobacter pylori infection, eosinophilic gastritis, tuberculosis, Crohn disease, and chronic granulomatous disease of childhood (20) are causes of gastric wall and rugal fold thickening. The fold thickening is usually <1 cm and commonly involves the antrum. Fold thickening may be easier to appreciate if the stomach is distended with water rather than opaque contrast material. Associated findings of hepatic or splenic abscesses support the diagnosis of chronic granulomatous disease of children, whereas concomitant abnormality of the terminal ileum is suggestive of Crohn disease or tuberculosis.
Marked diffuse fold thickening is seen in Zollinger– Ellison syndrome and Menetrier disease. Zollinger– Ellison
P.258

syndrome is characterized by increased gastric acid secretion secondary to a gastrinoma, which is a neuroendocrine tumor. CT findings include diffuse gastric wall and rugal fold thickening, ulcerations, and a large volume of fluid in the stomach and bowel related to hypersecretion of acid (Fig. 8.13). A pancreatic mass and hepatic metastases may be seen. Menetrier disease can have marked rugal thickening, but it is not associated with hypersecretion and it spares the antrum.
Figure 8.12. Trichobezoar. Coronal reformation shows a heterogeneous mass, containing soft tissue and air in the gastric lumen of this 15-year-old girl with alopecia and vomiting. Matted hair was found at the time of endoscopy.
Figure 8.13. Zollinger–Ellison syndrome. There is marked diffuse gastric wall thickening in this 8-year-old girl with recurrent diarrhea. The stomach contains a large amount of fluid owing to gastric acid hypersecretion. Note also hypervascular liver metastasis (arrow). The patient had a gastrin-secreting neuroendocrine tumor of the pancreas. (Case courtesy of Armed Forces Institute of Pathology.)
Hiatal Hernia
Hiatal hernia is a protrusion of a part of the stomach into the thorax. There are four types of hiatal hernias. Type I, the most common, is a sliding hernia (gastroesophageal junction displaced into chest) (Fig. 8.14A). Type II is a paraesophageal hernia (gastroesophageal junction below the esophageal hiatus and gastric fundus and sometimes body above the hiatus next to the esophagus). Type III has findings of both types I and II hernias (gastroesophageal junction, fundus, and body displaced into chest), and type IV is an intrathoracic stomach that is associated with herniation of other organs into the chest (21).
Figure 8.14. Hiatal hernia. A: Type I. The esophagogastric junction (GE) is displaced into the thorax. B: Fundoplication. The fundus of the stomach (St) wraps around the distal esophagus (e).
Nissen fundoplication is the surgical procedure to treat hiatus hernia and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). In fundoplication, the fundus of the stomach is wrapped around the inferior part of the esophagus. On CT, a fundoplication appears as a soft tissue mass at the gastroesophageal junction (Fig. 8.14B).
Varices
Gastric varices may be seen in the setting of portal hypertension or splenic vein thrombosis. CT findings include brightly enhancing, round or serpentine structures within the gastric wall, usually the fundus, or within the associated mesentery or omentum. These are best seen when water is used as a contrast agent and scans are acquired during the portal venous phase of enhancement. Gastric varices without esophageal varices are characteristic of splenic vein thrombosis.
Trauma
Blunt abdominal trauma can result in gastric perforation, with pneumoperitoneum, hemoperitoneum, interruption of the gastric wall, and leakage of oral contrast medium seen on CT (22). Rupture of the left hemidiaphragm can result in herniation of the stomach into the chest.
P.259

Duodenum and Small Intestine
Technique
Administration of oral contrast medium 45 to 60 minutes before imaging provides adequate opacification of most of the jejunum and ileum. Ingestion of additional contrast material 10 to 15 minutes prior to imaging is helpful to opacify the stomach, duodenum, and proximal jejunum. Positive contrast agent provides good visualization of the bowel lumen, but it may obscure visualization of mucosal lesions. Water used as a negative contrast agent may help to improve visualization of the underlying mucosa. Scanning during the portal venous phase of contrast enhancement usually provides adequate visualization of the small bowel mucosa. Multiplanar reformations and three-dimensional imaging can be helpful in assessing the level of bowel obstruction and longitudinal extent of inflammatory and neoplastic disease (23,24).
Normal Anatomy
The duodenum extends from the pylorus to the duodenojejunal junction at the ligament of Treitz. It has four parts. The duodenal bulb (first portion) is intraperitoneal and lies posterior or posterolateral to the gastric antrum. The descending (second) portion courses caudally to the right of the pancreatic head; it then turns to the left where it enters the retroperitoneum. The horizontal (third) part crosses posterior to the superior mesenteric vein and artery and anterior to the inferior vena cava and aorta. The ascending (fourth) part ascends just left of the superior mesenteric artery to the ligament of Treitz, where it exits the retroperitoneum and becomes the intraperitoneal jejunum.
Figure 8.15. Normal small bowel and mesenteric vessels. A: Small bowel folds, valvulae conniventes, are seen in the jejunum (J). The superior mesenteric vein (white arrow) is in its normal position, lying to the right of the superior mesenteric artery (black arrow). Note also the 3rd duodenum (D) coursing behind the mesenteric vessels. Liver fills the right renal fossa in this patient who had a right nephrectomy. B: CT scan in another patient shows featureless ileal loops in the right lower quadrant. Normal bowel wall is thin and difficult to discern.
The small bowel extends from the ligament of Treitz to the ileocecal valve. Jejunal loops have a feathery appearance, containing fine, smooth, linear folds, termed valvulae conniventes. Ileal loops are typically featureless (Fig. 8.15). Normal bowel wall thickness usually does not exceed 3 mm (25). The normal luminal diameter does not exceed 2.5 cm.
The small bowel mesentery connects the jejunum and ileum to the posterior abdominal wall. It appears as a fat-containing area central to the small bowel loops. The superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and superior mesenteric vein (SMV) and their branches and tributaries can be identified on contrast-enhanced CT scans (see Chapter 7). In normal individuals, the SMA lies to the left of the SMV (Fig. 8.15). Abnormalities of bowel rotation are suggested when the relationship of the SMA and SMV is reversed (26,27,28). Mesenteric lymph nodes are not commonly seen on CT scans in infants and children, although nodes ≤5 mm may sometimes be seen in adolescents.
Congenital Abnormalities
Malrotation
Malrotation is an anomaly of intestinal rotation and fixation. It encompasses a spectrum of rotational abnormalities including nonrotation (colon in the left abdomen, small bowel in the right abdomen), reverse nonrotation (small bowel on the left, colon on the right), reverse rotation (duodenum anterior to and colon posterior to the superior mesenteric artery, small bowel in the right abdomen), and incomplete rotation (a range of rotational abnormalities between nonrotation and normal rotation). Incomplete rotation commonly is symptomatic, presenting in the first month of life with bilious
P.260

vomiting. Symptoms are caused by obstruction from peritoneal bands (Ladd bands), midgut volvulus, or a combination of the two abnormalities. Nonrotation usually is asymptomatic.
Figure 8.16. Nonrotation. Note small bowel loops (arrows) and their mesentery are in the right abdomen and colon (open arrow) is in the left abdomen.
Figure 8.17. Midgut malrotation and volvulus. A, B: Two axial CT scans of the upper abdomen in a patient with acute abdominal pain and vomiting shows clockwise swirling of the superior mesenteric vein (black arrow) and transverse duodenum (arrowhead) around the superior mesenteric artery. Also note the dilated proximal duodenum (D). C: Coronal reformation in the same patient shows a markedly dilated stomach (S) and proximal duodenum (D). High-grade obstruction owing to malrotation and midgut volvulus confirmed at surgery.
CT findings of midgut rotation are an abnormal location of the bowel (Fig. 8.16) and inversion of the usual relationship between the superior mesenteric artery and vein such that the vein is anterior to or to the left of the artery (26,27,28). Findings of midgut volvulus include clockwise swirling of the superior mesenteric vein, duodenum and mesentery around the superior mesenteric artery (whirlpool sign) (Fig. 8.17), and stretching of the mesenteric vessels. Of note, counterclockwise swirling of these vessels is not usually associated with malrotation or volvulus (29). Additional findings of volvulus include a fluid-filled proximal duodenum that tapers to the point of obstruction (Fig. 8.17), peritoneal fluid, and thickened bowel wall from hemorrhage or edema (30). Midgut volvulus is a surgical emergency.
P.261

Figure 8.18. Duodenal duplication. Coronal reformation. There is a water-attenuation mass (M) medial to the descending duodenum (arrow). A duplication cyst arising from the junction of the antrum and first portion of the duodenum was confirmed at surgery.
Duplication Cysts
The small bowel is the most common location for gastrointestinal tract duplications. Approximately 5% of small bowel duplications occur in the duodenum, 10% in the jejunum, 35% in the ileum, and 50% in the ileocecal region (3). Symptoms are usually due to mass effect and include vomiting owing to partial or complete bowel obstruction and pain. About 25% of small bowel duplications contain ectopic gastric mucosa (4). Peptic ulceration of this ectopic mucosa can cause abdominal pain and gastrointestinal bleeding. The CT appearance of small bowel duplication cysts is that of a smooth-walled cystic mass with near-water-attenuation contents (Fig. 8.18). The attenuation value increases when the cyst contents are hemorrhagic, proteinaceous, or purulent. The cysts rarely communicate with the bowel lumen.
Duodenal Diverticula
Duodenal diverticula most often arise from the second and third portions of the duodenum. On CT, they appear as well-circumscribed round structures extending from the duodenal wall. The lumen can contain oral contrast material, gas, or food.
Neoplasia
Primary small bowel tumors are uncommon in children. When they occur, they are more likely to be malignant than benign. Patients with small bowel neoplasms come to clinical attention because of a palpable abdominal mass, abdominal pain, small bowel obstruction, or gastrointestinal bleeding. CT is useful in demonstrating extramural tumor extent, invasion of adjacent structures, and adenopathy.
Polyps are the most common benign tumor of the small bowel in children (4). They can be isolated or they may be associated with the multiple polyposis syndromes, such as Peutz–Jeghers (Fig. 8.19), Cronkhite–Canada, and Gardner. When they are large, they are easily recognized on CT, appearing as well-circumscribed, intraluminal soft tissue masses with smooth margins.
Hamartomas, leiomyomas, GISTs, and hemangiomas are rare benign neoplasms of the small intestine in children. Hamartomas and leiomyomas are usually spherical, smooth, homogeneous masses with a predominant extraluminal component. Leiomyomas may contain amorphous calcification and tend to enhance following administration of intravenous contrast material. GISTs have an appearance similar to those in the stomach, appearing as large, exophytic soft tissue masses, which often have low-attenuation areas from necrosis or cyst formation (31). Gastrointestinal hemangiomas may be solitary or diffuse. CT shows focal or diffuse wall thickening and intense enhancement following contrast administration (32,33).
Lymphoma is the most common small bowel malignancy in children and is more often due to non-Hodgkin
P.262

lymphoma than to Hodgkin lymphoma. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma typically occurs in the terminal ileum and its mesentery. CT findings of small bowel lymphoma include circumferential bowel wall thickening (>1-cm diameter), a polypoid mural mass, and bulky mesenteric lymph node enlargement (Fig. 8.20) (34). The infiltrated bowel wall has soft tissue attenuation and shows only minimal enhancement. Ulceration, aneurysmal dilatation of the bowel lumen secondary to mucosal infiltration and excavation, and intussusception are common. A mantle of enlarged lymph nodes may envelop the superior mesenteric vessels, producing the sandwich sign.
Figure 8.19. Small bowel polyp. There is a round homogeneous soft tissue mass (white arrow) in the jejunum of this 7-year-old girl with Peutz–Jeghers syndrome. An intussusception (black arrow) is also present. A polyp was identified at surgery as the cause of the intussusception.
Figure 8.20. Ileal lymphoma. The wall of the terminal ileum (arrows) is concentrically thickened by non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Note also excavation of the bowel lumen, producing mild aneurysmal dilatation.
An increased incidence of lymphoproliferative disorder and B-cell lymphoma has been reported in solid organ transplant recipients (35,36). The CT appearance of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder and lymphoma in the immunocompromised host is indistinguishable from lymphoma in the immunocompetent host (Fig. 8.21). However, extranodal involvement, including brain, bone marrow, abdominal viscera (spleen and liver), and mucocutaneous sites, are more frequent in patients with transplant-related lymphoma (35,36).
Figure 8.21. Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder. The wall of the duodenum (arrows) is concentrically thickened, and there is aneurysmal dilatation of the lumen in this 10-year-old boy with non-Hodgkin lymphoma following lung transplantation.
Leiomyosarcoma has been described in children 4 years of age and older. Adenocarcinoma has been reported occasionally in childhood and usually is far advanced at diagnosis. The CT findings of both tumors include focal wall thickening, a polypoid mass, and an annular stricture with mural thickening (24). Partial or complete bowel obstruction is common. Regional lymph nodes may be enlarged.
Metastases
Although uncommon, small bowel metastases can be seen in children with ovarian carcinoma and melanoma. Bowed metastases result in masses on the bowel serosa and ascites. The involved loops may be kinked and sometimes obstructed (1).
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Crohn Disease
Crohn disease or regional enteritis is the most common inflammatory disease of the small bowel. It can affect any part of the gastrointestinal tract, but it most often involves the terminal ileum and proximal colon. Histologically, the acute phase is characterized by mucosal edema and aph-thous ulcers; the chronic phase is associated with transmural fibrosis and strictures. Evaluation of mucosal abnormalities is easily done with double contrast barium radiography and colonoscopy, but CT, especially with multiplanar reformations, is better for demonstrating extraluminal complications, such as abscesses, fistulae, and sinus tracts (37,38,39,40,41,42).
The characteristic CT findings of Crohn disease are circumferential bowel wall thickening, ranging from 5 to 10 mm in diameter, lymphadenopathy, soft tissue stranding in the adjacent mesentery, and increased mesenteric fat (termed creeping fat) (Fig. 8.22) (37,38,39,40,41,42). Wall thickening may be homogeneous or have a layered appearance, either a targetlike pattern (three layers) or double-halo pattern (two layers). The target appearance results from contrast enhancement of the mucosal and muscularis propria layers with an intervening low-attenuation layer resulting from edema or increased deposition of fat in the submucosa. Wall thickening can result in luminal narrowing and proximal bowel dilatation. Acutely inflamed bowel enhances brightly after intravenous contrast
P.263

administration. Dilatation and tortuosity of widely spaced mesenteric vessels also can be seen in acute disease, owing to hyperemia. This appearance in Crohn disease has been termed the comb sign (Fig. 8.22B) (43). Skip areas of normal bowel interposed between areas of diseased bowel are typical of Crohn disease.
Figure 8.22. Crohn disease. A: The distal segment of ileum is concentrically thickened (arrow) and surrounded by an abnormal quantity of mesenteric fat (creeping fat) (f). B: Coronal reformation in another patient shows circumferential terminal ileal thickening and dilatation of the mesenteric vessels, producing a comb-like appearance (arrows).
Complications of Crohn disease, including phlegmon, abscess, and fistulas, are well seen with CT. Phlegmon appears as an ill-defined, soft tissue mass in the mesentery or omentum. Extramural abscess appears as a well-marginated, round or oval, fluid collection with enhancing walls. Gas, appearing as multiple air bubbles or an air–fluid level, occurs in 30% to 50% of abscesses (37). Unlike abscesses that may require percutaneous catheter drainage, phlegmons usually resolve with antibiotic therapy.
Fistulous tracts are a hallmark of Crohn disease, occurring in 20% to 40% of patients (34,35). Fistulae are commonly enteroenteric, but they can be enterocolic, enterovesical, enterovaginal, enterocutaneous, or intramural. A fistulous tract appears as a linear collection of air or oral contrast material adjacent to an actively inflamed segment of bowel (Fig. 8.23) (40). The sensitivity of CT for fistula detection is ≥90% (38). CT enteroclysis using water with additives as a negative oral contrast agent has been shown to provide good bowel distention and evaluation of extraluminal abnormalities in adults, but there has been little experience with this agent in children (44,45).
Infectious Diseases
Yersinia enterocolitica causes CT findings similar to those of Crohn disease. These include ileal and colonic wall thickening, luminal narrowing, and mesenteric lymph node enlargement. The involved nodes sometimes have low-attenuation centers and enhancing rims (46).
Granulomatous infections of bowel are rare in children, but they also can mimic Crohn disease. Tuberculosis and histoplasmosis, when disseminated, may produce intestinal wall thickening, enlargement of intra-abdominal lymph nodes, and omental and peritoneal thickening. Granulomatous infections usually involve the terminal ileum (Fig. 8.24).
Figure 8.23. Crohn disease with a fistulous tract. CT scan shows thickened terminal ileum (I) with a fistulous tract (arrow) extending to an adjacent abscess (A). Note also an increased amount of mesenteric fat.
P.264

Figure 8.24. Histoplasmosis. A thick-walled segment of terminal ileum (arrows) is noted in the lower abdomen of a 10-year-old girl.
Several pathogens in the small and large bowel have been associated with immunocompromised states and AIDS, including Cryptosporidium parvum, Cytomegalovirus, Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare, and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. These infections usually cause nonspecific thickening of the wall of the ileum and ascending colon. Contiguous spread to distal areas of the colon may occur, and there may be serosal and mucosal enhancement following administration of intravenous contrast agent (47,48). Other findings that have been reported include pneumatosis intestinalis in cryptosporidiosis and bulky, low-attenuation mesenteric and retroperitoneal lymph nodes in Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare infection.
Giardia lamblia is a common cause of infestation in children with secretory immunoglobulin A (IgA) deficiency. CT findings include duodenal and jejunal wall thickening and enlarged mesenteric lymph nodes.
Noninflammatory Disorders
Edematous Disorders
Causes of small bowel edema include right-sided congestive heart failure, nephrotic syndrome, portal hypertension, hypoalbuminemia, and hypovolemic shock (49,50). The edema predominantly involves the submucosal layer, and on CT, it manifests as circumferential wall thickening with a low-attenuation submucosal layer and higher-attenuation mucosa and muscularis (i.e., the target sign). Other findings include increased attenuation of the small bowel mesentery and enlarged mesenteric vessels. In the setting of hypovolemic shock, the intestinal mucosa often shows intense contrast enhancement and mural thickening (Fig. 8.25).
Figure 8.25. Hypovolemic shock. Contrast-enhanced CT scan demonstrates multiple dilated small bowel loops with brightly enhancing mucosa and folds.
Primary intestinal lymphangiectasia is a rare congenital disorder characterized by dilated lymphatics within the intestinal villi (51,52). Secondary lymphangiectasia results from mesenteric tumor obstructing segmental lymphatic channels. CT shows diffusely thickened bowel wall containing small (<1- to 2-mm) low-attenuation nodules or linear streaks, presumed to represent dilated lacteals (Fig. 8.26). Chylous ascites is common.
Figure 8.26. Primary lymphangiectasia, 7-year-old boy. Thickened jejunal loops containing small, low-attenuation nodules (arrowheads) are seen in the left midabdomen. Also note mesenteric (m) edema.
P.265

Figure 8.27. Mesenteric ischemia. A: CT scan of a 16-year-old boy with occlusion of the superior mesenteric artery following a penetrating abdominal injury. The ischemic segments of bowel (asterisk) contain intramural air (arrowheads). Also seen are adjacent mesenteric edema and several dilated small bowel loops proximal to the infarcted bowel. B: Mesenteric veno-occlusive disease in a 15-year-old boy. Pancreatitis led to occlusion of the portal and superior mesenteric veins. CT scan shows severe thickening of all the visible small bowel loops in the anterior abdomen. The loops are also mildly dilated.
Mesenteric ischemia in the pediatric population is usually due to neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis. After the neonatal period, arterial occlusion may occur as a complication of abdominal trauma or volvulus. CT findings in patients with mesenteric arterial occlusion include bowel wall thickening secondary to edema or hemorrhage, intramural gas (pneumatosis) (Fig. 8.27A), and portal or mesenteric venous gas (53,54,55,56). Abrupt termination of the superior mesenteric artery at the point of occlusion, dilatation of bowel loops proximal to the infarcted segment, stranding of the adjacent mesentery, and ascites are other findings. Mesenteric vein occlusion can occur as a complication of pancreatitis or hypercoagulable states. On CT, the involved bowel and associated mesentery are thickened owing to hemorrhage and venous congestion (Fig. 8.27B). Thrombus may be seen in the superior mesenteric artery or vein or their major branches after intravenous contrast administration.
Graft versus host disease (GVHD) is a complication of heterotopic bone marrow transplantation affecting 50% to 70% of allogeneic transplants. Donor T lymphocytes cause selected damage to the cellular lining of recipient target organs—usually the skin, liver, and gastrointestinal tract (57,58,59). It can affect the entire bowel from the duodenum to rectum, but more commonly it involves the small bowel. CT findings are dilated fluid-filled loops of bowel with intense mucosal enhancement in the affected bowel segments (Fig. 8.28). Mucosal enhancement reflects the histologic finding of mucosal destruction and replacement by a thin layer of
P.266

vascular granulation tissue. There is loss of the normal fold pattern. The bowel wall may or may not be thickened. Extraintestinal findings include ringlike mucosal enhancement of the gallbladder and urinary bladder walls similar to that seen in the bowel, increased attenuation of the mesenteric fat, engorged mesenteric vessels, and ascites.
Figure 8.28. Graft versus host disease. Coronal reformation in a 20-month-old girl following bone marrow transplantation for acute myelogenous leukemia shows multiple, fluid-filled loops of small bowel with increased mucosal enhancement. The mesenteric vessels (arrow) supplying the affected area are mildly dilated.
Radiation injury involves the small bowel more often than it does the large bowel and is limited to segments of intestine included in the radiation port (39). CT findings include bowel wall and serosal thickening, adherence of adjacent bowel loops, increased attenuation of the mesenteric fat, and retraction of the mesentery. Strictures are a late complication.
Hemorrhagic Conditions
Duodenal and small bowel hemorrhage in children is usually the result of blunt abdominal trauma or Henoch-Schönlein purpura. Less frequent causes include bleeding diatheses, such as hemophilia, aplastic anemia and idiopathic thrombocytopenia, and invasive endoscopic procedures. If a history of trauma or coagulopathy is absent, nonaccidental trauma needs to be considered as a cause for the hemorrhage. CT findings include circumferential or eccentric wall thickening, thickening of the valvulae conniventes, and intraluminal clot (Fig. 8.29). The bowel lumen may be obstructed by hematoma or by an associated intussusception (53,60). The attenuation of the wall can be increased when the hematoma is acute (Fig. 8.29), although this can be difficult to identify after administration of intravenous contrast material.
Figure 8.29. Small bowel hemorrhage. A: Henoch-Schönlein purpura, intramural hematoma. There is circumferential, homogenous wall thickening in several segments of jejunum (arrows). The high attenuation of the bowel wall is from acute hemorrhage. B: Bleeding diathesis, intraluminal hematoma. High-attenuation clotted blood (arrow) is seen in the descending duodenum.
Small Bowel Obstruction
The diagnosis of small bowel obstruction is usually established by clinical history, physical examination, and plain abdominal radiography. CT can aid in determining the location and cause of the obstruction when conventional imaging studies are indeterminate (61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70). There are numerous causes for small bowel obstruction, but the more common causes are intussusception, inguinal hernia, appendicitis, superior mesenteric artery syndrome, and adhesions.
Bowel obstruction can be diagnosed on CT when there are dilated fluid or contrast-filled loops of bowel proximal to a transition zone, beyond which the small bowel and/or colon are collapsed (Fig. 8.30). In the setting of adhesions, beaklike narrowing may be seen at the site of obstruction (71). The sensitivity of CT for detecting small bowel obstruction ranges from about 65% to 100% (64,65,66). The highest sensitivities have been reported in high-grade or long-standing obstruction (61,68). False-negative diagnoses occur in low-grade partial or early obstruction.
In partial obstruction, the small bowel may be minimally dilated and the transition zone may be barely apparent or not seen (64,69). The bowel distal to the obstruction is not completely collapsed, and the colon is normal or minimally dilated and contains fluid and gas. Ileus has a CT appearance similar to that of partial small bowel obstruction.
Closed-loop obstruction refers to the occlusion of a segment of bowel at two points, blocking ingress and
P.267

egress of bowel contents. In this scenario, there is eventually compromise of arterial blood flow, leading to ischemia and ultimately infarction (i.e., strangulated bowel). Closed-loop obstruction is most commonly due to midgut volvulus or adhesive bands and less often to internal hernias. CT findings include a distended, U-shaped, fluid-filled loop of bowel, two adjacent collapsed loops of bowel at the site of obstruction (Fig. 8.31), a beaklike appearance of the segments of bowel entering and exiting the closed loop, a whirled or twisted configuration of the bowel near the site of obstruction, and dilated and stretched mesenteric vessels converging toward the site of obstruction (72). Bowel wall thickness is normal.
Figure 8.30. High-grade small bowel obstruction. Axial (A) and coronal (B) reformatted scans in this 8-year-old boy with prior surgery for appendicitis show multiple dilated loops of fluid-filled small bowel proximal to the point of obstruction (arrow) in the jejunum. Small bowel loops in the right abdomen below the transition point are collapsed. An adhesion was confirmed at surgery.
CT signs of ischemia or strangulation include thickened bowel wall, dilated mesenteric vessels, increased attenuation of the mesenteric fat owing to hemorrhage, pneumatosis intestinalis, gas in portal and mesenteric veins, and ascites (69,71,72). The bowel wall can have a layered appearance resulting from contrast enhancement of the mucosa and muscularis layers with an intervening hypoattenuating layer resulting from submucosal edema, or it may show poor or absent enhancement following intravenous contrast administration.
Hernia
A hernia is a protrusion of abdominal contents, usually bowel and omentum, through a congenital or acquired defect in the abdominal wall (external hernia) or peritoneal surface (internal hernia) (73,74). Inguinal and umbilical hernias are the most common hernias in children. History and physical examination usually suffice for the diagnosis of external hernia. By comparison, the diagnosis of internal hernia is difficult to establish clinically. CT is an excellent method for determining the presence and location of this type of protrusion.
Internal hernias most often occur in the paraduodenal region and are more common on the left than on the right. They arise as a result of a congenital defect in the mesocolon into which small bowel protrudes (75,76). In left paraduodenal hernias, small bowel usually is interposed between the stomach and the body of the pancreas (Fig. 8.32) or it lies behind the pancreas. On the right side, herniated bowel loops lie lateral and inferior to the descending duodenum (74).
Intussusception
Intussusception occurs when a segment of intestine (the intussusceptum) prolapses into the lumen of a more distal segment of bowel (the intussuscipiens). Affected children are typically between 3 months and 2 years of age. Approximately 90% of intussusceptions are ileocolic; the rest are ileoileocolic, colocolic, or ileoileal. More than 90% of intussusceptions have no pathologic lead point and are believed to be due to enlarged lymphoid follicles in the terminal ileum. The remaining cases have true
P.268

pathologic lead points, such as Meckel diverticula, polyps, duplication cysts, or hematomas.
Figure 8.31. Closed loop obstruction without infarction. A, Axial CT scan and B, coronal reformation show a dilated, U-shaped, fluid-filled loop of distal ileum (arrows). Note the normal bowel wall thickness and enhancement and normal caliber bowel loops proximal and distal to the obstruction. An adhesion with closed loop obstruction was confirmed surgically. The bowel was viable.
When viewed in cross section, the intussusception has a bull's-eye or target appearance (77), characterized by the following: a high-attenuation center related to the presence of contrast material in the lumen of the intussusceptum; an adjacent soft tissue layer representing the edematous wall of the intussusceptum; a surrounding layer of fat attenuation representing the invaginated mesentery; a layer of oral contrast material, which lies within the lumen of the intussuscipiens; and an outermost soft tissue layer representing the stretched wall of the intussuscipiens
P.269

(Fig. 8.33). Pathologic lead points appear as intraluminal water or soft tissue masses (Fig. 8.34).
Figure 8.32. Left paraduodenal hernia. CT scan through the upper abdomen of a 15-year-old boy shows a loop of unopacified jejunum (arrows) and its mesentery to the left of the pancreatic head (P). At surgery, the bowel had herniated through a defect in the mesocolon.
Figure 8.33. Colocolic intussusception. There is an intussusception (arrows) in the descending colon, which has a target appearance with a soft-tissue center representing the proximal intussusceptum, a middle layer of fat (f), which represents the mesentery, and an outer layer representing intussuscipiens. Note the proximal colonic dilatation. The intussusception was idiopathic and reducible.
Figure 8.34. Small bowel intussusception. There is a central polypoid soft tissue mass (arrow) which acted as the lead point of an intussusception in the proximal ileum. Note the adjacent layer of fat corresponding to intussuscepted mesentery and the outer soft tissue layer representing the intussuscipiens. A hamartoma was found at surgery.
It should be noted that incidental, self-limiting intussusceptions are not uncommon findings on CT. These do not result in obstruction, and they do not have a pathologic lead point. Most incidental intussusceptions are enteroenteric (jejunum > ileum) and <3 cm long (mean 2.2 cm) (Fig. 8.35) (78). Although transient intussusceptions are usually not clinically significant, if they are recurrent or persist, further evaluation with a small bowel study is warranted to evaluate for underlying lead point.
Figure 8.35. Transient intussusception. CT examination was performed for evaluation of a pelvic mass. The patient had no symptoms referable to bowel. There is a small intussusception (arrows) in the distal jejunum, which was seen on only one image. Note the absence of proximal bowel dilatation, supporting the diagnosis of a self-limiting intussusception.
Superior Mesenteric Artery Syndrome
The superior mesenteric artery (SMA) syndrome refers to mechanical obstruction of the third part of the duodenum as it courses between the superior mesenteric artery and lumbar spine. Patients often have a history of rapid and marked weight loss, leading to excessive loss of retroperitoneal and mesenteric fat. CT findings include abrupt narrowing of the third duodenum as it crosses the midline and a dilated proximal duodenum (Fig. 8.36) (79).
Appendicitis
Acute appendicitis is the most common surgical cause of acute abdominal pain in the pediatric population. There are a number of protocols for performing CT for evaluation of appendicitis. These include (a) full abdominopelvic scanning after intravenous and oral contrast administration, (b) imaging limited to the lower abdomen and pelvis without any contrast material, (c) imaging of the full abdomen and pelvis or limited to the lower abdomen and pelvis with the use of only oral and rectal contrast agents,
P.270

(d) imaging of the lower abdomen and pelvis with the use of only rectal contrast agent, and (e) imaging of the whole abdomen or pelvis with only intravenous contrast (80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90). Although the choice of CT technique is dependent on the clinical situation, local preference, and available resources, the use of intravenous contrast does appear to improve diagnostic accuracy (83). The reported sensitivity of CT using such methodology has ranged from 97% to 100%, and the specificity has ranged from 94% to 98% (90,91,92,93,94,95).
Figure 8.36. Superior mesenteric artery syndrome. The third portion of the duodenum is compressed as it passes between the aorta (A) and the superior mesenteric artery (arrow). Note the normal relationship of the superior mesenteric vein (arrowhead), to the right of the artery. The duodenum (D) proximal to the obstruction is dilated.
Figure 8.37. Normal appendix. CT scan shows a contrast and air-filled appendix (arrow), 6 mm in diameter, with imperceptible wall thickness medial to the cecal tip. Note absence of periappendiceal inflammation.
Rectal contrast is generally well tolerated in children. The amount of contrast material administered is based on the size of the patient and the degree of fullness and discomfort that the patient can tolerate when the fluid is instilled. The administered volume of fluid ranges from 500 mL in small children to 1,000 mL in adolescents (90).
Figure 8.38. Uncomplicated appendicitis. A, Axial and B, coronal CT images scans. The appendix is dilated, measuring 1.5 cm in diameter, and fluid-filled and has a thickened wall which enhances (arrow). Periappendiceal inflammatory changes are present.
The normal appendix has a wall thickness of ≤3 mm and a diameter that is usually ≤6 mm (Fig. 8.37) (88,89,90,96). However, a diameter >6 mm has been reported, and then findings of a thick enhancing wall and periappendiceal inflammation will need to be present for the diagnosis of appendicitis (97). The lumen of the normal appendix may be fluid filled or contain small amounts of air or oral contrast agent. The wall usually does not enhance after administration of intravenous contrast medium.
The characteristic CT signs of appendicitis are a distended appendix (>6 mm in diameter) and an enhancing thick wall (>3 mm in diameter) (Fig. 8.38) (96,98,99,100,101,102). In early appendicitis, the inflammatory changes may be limited to the appendiceal tip (101). Identification of an appendicolith in an individual with acute right lower quadrant pain is also considered highly suggestive of acute appendicitis (103). Appendicoliths have been noted in 40% to 65% of children with appendicitis and in approximately 2% to 15% without appendicitis (96,98,103) (Fig. 8.38). Other findings of appendicitis include cecal wall thickening, inflammatory stranding of the pericecal fat, mesenteric lymphadenopathy, and free peritoneal fluid. These signs are nonspecific and may be seen with various right lower quadrant and pelvic infectious or inflammatory conditions.
Findings suggesting appendiceal perforation include phlegmon (Fig. 8.39), abscess (Fig. 8.40), extraluminal air (Fig. 8.41), an extraluminal appendicolith (Fig. 8.41),
P.271

and a defect in the enhancing appendiceal wall (104,105). CT findings of phlegmon include an ill-defined nonsuppurative soft tissue mass, loss of definition of fascial planes, and streaky soft tissue infiltration of the adjacent mesenteric fat (Fig. 8.39). Abscesses appear as walled-off extraluminal fluid collections with peripheral contrast enhancement (Fig. 8.40). Similar to abscesses elsewhere in the body, they may contain air bubbles or an air–fluid level. Phlegmons and small abscesses usually respond to antibiotic therapy alone without surgery. Large abscesses are usually managed with percutaneous drainage (106).
Figure 8.39. Perforated appendicitis. CT scan through the pelvis shows cecal wall thickening (white arrows), phlegmon (open arrow), and mesenteric lymphadenopathy (N). C, cecum. No appendix was identifiable, but the diagnosis was presumed perforated appendicitis, which was surgically confirmed.
Figure 8.40. Perforated appendicitis. Coronal reformation shows several thick-walled, low-attenuation fluid collections with enhancing walls (arrows).
Figure 8.41. Perforated appendicitis. Extraluminal appendicolith (black arrow) and extraluminal air (white arrow) are present in this patient with a perforated appendix.
Acute mesenteric vein thrombosis is a rare complication of appendicitis (107). Contrast-enhanced CT demonstrates a filling defect in the superior mesenteric vein. A high-attenuation thrombus on noncontrast scans indicates a relatively acute occlusion. In patients with associated phlebitis, the wall of the vein is thickened and may show rim enhancement; adjacent mesenteric edema also may be seen.
Meckel Diverticulum
The omphalomesenteric duct is an in utero tubular structure that connects the midgut at the level of the ileum to the yolk sac (108). The duct normally involutes in the first trimester. Meckel diverticulum develops when the ileal end of the duct remains open. Patients may present with abdominal pain owing to intussusception with the diverticulum as the lead point or with bleeding owing to the presence of ectopic gastric mucosa in the diverticulum. Uncomplicated Meckel diverticula are difficult to diagnose on imaging studies. An inflamed Meckel diverticulum may be seen at CT, appearing as a fluid-filled tube with enhancing walls, usually located within 60 cm of the ileocecal valve (Fig. 8.42).
P.272

Figure 8.42. Meckel diverticulum. Coronal reformation shows a fluid-filled tube with enhancing walls (arrow) in close proximity to the ileum (I).
Mesenteric Adenitis
Mesenteric adenitis refers to inflammation of the lymph nodes in the bowel mesentery. The most common site of inflammation is the right lower quadrant (109,110). Inciting pathogens include Yersinia enterocolitica and Yersinia pseudotuberculosis. Affected patients may present with findings mimicking those of appendicitis. CT findings include clustered and enlarged mesenteric lymph nodes (>5 mm in shortest diameter) (Fig. 8.43).
Colon
Technique
Administration of oral contrast agents well in advance of the CT study usually serves to opacify the colon and rectum. Rectal contrast, either positive or negative (water or air), can help to clarify suspected colonic pathology but is usually not necessary for a diagnosis. Administration of intravenous contrast agent can be helpful in evaluating causes of wall thickening and mural lesions. Scanning is performed during the portal venous phase of contrast enhancement.
CT colonography is being used to evaluate colonic pathology in adults, but experience with this technique is still limited in children (111). CT colonography requires a bowel preparation similar to that used for conventional colonography. A rectal tube is inserted and the colon is insufflated with room air or carbon dioxide. The colon is scanned with the patient both supine and prone using narrow collimation, a reconstruction interval of 1 mm, and a low-dose technique. Two-dimensional axial and 3D volume-rendered images, including “fly-through” views, are acquired and viewed on a computer workstation. The role of CT colonography in children has been in polyp detection (Fig. 8.44).
Figure 8.43. Mesenteric adenitis. Enlarged, soft tissue attenuation lymph nodes (arrows) are seen in the small bowel mesentery of this 4-year-old boy with right lower quadrant pain.
Normal Anatomy
The colon extends from the cecal tip to the anus. The ascending and descending colon are retroperitoneal, whereas the transverse and sigmoid colon are intraperitoneal. The colon is easily recognized by its location and its haustral markings when distended by contrast or air. Inherent fecal material also serves as identifier of the colon and rectum. On CT, the thickness of the wall of the colon should not exceed 3 mm (12).
Several variations in colonic anatomy need to be recognized so that they are not mistaken for pathology. The transverse colon may ascend more superiorly than usual, lying anterior and superior to the liver, or it may descend more caudally into the pelvis. Part of the right or left colon may fill the evacuated renal fossa in patients who have renal agenesis or a nephrectomy.
Congenital Anomalies
Colonic duplication cysts constitute 15% to 20% of all gastrointestinal tract duplications (3). Clinical findings include a palpable mass, bowel obstruction, and rectal
P.273

bleeding. Like other gastrointestinal duplications, most are spherical, low-attenuation masses with thin walls (Fig. 8.45). They usually arise near the cecum and do not communicate with the colonic lumen. In some cases, the duplication is tubular, rather than spherical, and may involve a long segment of the colon or the entire colon. Unlike spherical duplications, tubular duplications can communicate with the lumen.
Figure 8.44. Virtual colonoscopy. Coronal reformatted (A) and 3D endoluminal (B) images show a large lobulated polypoid mass (arrows) in the splenic flexure. (Reprinted from
Anupindi S, Perumpillichira J, Israel EJ, et al. Low-dose CT colonography in children: initial experience, technical feasibility, and utility. Pediatr Radiol 2005 35:518–524, with permission.
) (See color insert.)
Figure 8.45. Rectal duplication. The rectal duplication (Dup) appears as a round mass with thin smooth walls and near-water-attenuation contents. The air-filled rectum (R) is displaced anteriorly.
Congenital anorectal malformation, also known as imperforate anus, is characterized by an abnormal termination of the hindgut. Prior to surgical intervention, CT has been used to show the relationship of the intestine to the levator sling and the amount of residual muscle mass. In cases of postoperative incontinence, CT scans can demonstrate the position of the pulled-through rectum within the levator sling (Fig. 8.46) (112).
Figure 8.46. Anorectal malformation. CT scan in a 10-year-old boy with incontinence following surgery for imperforate anus. The rectum (arrow) is eccentrically positioned within the levator sling (arrowheads). Typically, it should be centrally positioned.
P.274

In nonrotation of the bowel, the entire colon lies in the left abdomen. In reverse nonrotation, the entire colon is on the right and in incomplete rotation, the cecum is high and near the midline.
Neoplasia
Colonic tumors are usually detected on barium studies or at colonoscopy. CT can be useful to further characterize a mass and determine its extent. Juvenile polyps are the most common benign neoplasm of the colon in children. They are inflammatory and not adenomatous as they are in adults and are thought to represent mucus-retention cysts that develop when the orifices of the mucus glands are blocked. Rare benign tumors include lipomas, neurofibromas, and hemangiomas. Colonic polyps appear as well-defined pedunculated intraluminal masses or as sessile masses of soft tissue attenuation (Fig. 8.44). Lipomas have a typical fatty appearance on CT. Neurofibromas present as focal soft tissue masses, whereas hemangiomas are usually intramural nodules in the rectal wall that enhance after intravenous contrast administration.
Malignant neoplasms include lymphoma, adenocarcinoma, and carcinoid (neuroendocrine carcinoma) (113,114). Lymphoma produces marked bowel wall thickening, often >3 cm in diameter. Typically, colonic lymphoma is homogeneous, although large tumors may show low-attenuation areas representing necrosis. The bowel lumen is usually normal or dilated at the site of tumor involvement. Unlike adenocarcinoma, luminal narrowing and bowel obstruction are uncommon. Colonic lymphoma is often associated with mesenteric or retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy. In patients with AIDS, cytomegalovirus infection can cause a focal mass indistinguishable from that seen in patients with lymphoma (115).
Figure 8.47. Colonic adenocarcinoma. A: Axial CT scan in a 14-year-old girl demonstrates circumferential thickening of the rectum (arrows) with luminal narrowing. Note the absence of stratification, which is typical of malignant tumors. There is spread of tumor into the pericolonic fat. B: CT scan in a 13-year-old girl shows focal thickening of the ascending colon (arrows) and luminal narrowing with associated small bowel (SB) dilatation due to obstruction.
CT findings of adenocarcinoma include circumferential or eccentric wall thickening and an irregular or polypoid mass (Fig. 8.47). Luminal narrowing and bowel obstruction are common. Other findings include tumor extension into adjacent organs or the pericolonic fat, mesenteric lymph node enlargement, omental or mesenteric masses, and ascites. Liver and lung are common sites for metastases.
Carcinoid tumors arise from neuroendocrine cells in the mucosa of the bowel and are often small. Most tumors are found in the appendix (114). They may present as a primary colonic mass, but more often they are occult and present with metastatic spread to the mesentery or liver.
Inflammatory and Infectious Diseases of the Colon
Idiopathic Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) includes Crohn colitis (granulomatous colitis) and ulcerative colitis. Patients with either disease can present with cramping abdominal pain, rectal urgency, and bright red rectal bleeding. Barium studies and colonoscopy are superior to CT for showing mucosal changes, but CT can provide information about colonic wall and extracolonic changes (116,117,118,119).
P.275

Figure 8.48. Crohn colitis. A: There is circumferential wall thickening in the cecum (white arrow), sigmoid colon (S), and terminal ileum (TI) and proliferation of mesenteric fat around the sigmoid colon. Also note dilated, widely spaced vessels (open arrow) (so-called “comb” sign) in the sigmoid mesocolon and a small amount of ascites (A) in the right lower quadrant. B: Transverse CT in another patient shows symmetric wall thickening of the right, transverse and left colon. Note the irregular appearance of the serosa, a finding not typically seen in ulcerative colitis.
Crohn colitis most commonly involves the right colon and rectum. CT findings include wall thickening, inflammatory changes in the pericolonic fat, fatty proliferation of mesentery (creeping fat), and mesenteric lymphadenopathy (Fig. 8.48). There may be serosal irregularity, skip lesions, and involvement of small bowel. Engorged, tortuous, and widely spread mesenteric vessels (comb sign) can also be seen. Abscesses and fistulae can develop in areas with severe inflammation (Fig. 8.49). Fistulae are especially common in the perirectal area.
Ulcerative colitis begins in the anus and extends proximally without skip lesions (Fig. 8.50) (118). Increased deposition of fat is usually limited to the perirectal space (Fig. 8.50). Narrowing and shortening of the colon with obliteration of the normal haustration is characteristic of chronic ulcerative colitis. Abscess and fistulae are rare.
Figure 8.49. Complicated Crohn disease. A: Perianal fistulae. Two small collections of air (arrows) are present within the right lateral wall of the anus, representing intramural fistulae. B: Perianal abscess. A low-attenuation perianal fluid collection (arrows) is seen in another patient.
In Crohn disease, the wall thickening ranges between 5 and 15 mm (mean, 11 mm). In ulcerative colitis, it ranges between 6 and 10 mm (mean, 8 mm) (116,117,118,119).
Other Inflammatory Colitis
Pseudomembranous colitis is a pancolonic disease caused by overgrowth of Clostridium difficile bacteria in the setting
P.276

of antibiotic therapy. An enterotoxin produced by the bacillus results in mucosal ulceration, creating pseudomembranes of sloughed mucosal cells, inflammatory cells, fibrin, and mucin. CT findings include marked, low-attenuation wall thickening (mean, 15 mm), irregular mucosal contour, pooling of contrast material between thickened low-attenuation haustral folds (accordion sign), pericolonic soft tissue stranding, and ascites (Fig. 8.51) (120,121,122,123,124). The accordion sign is not specific for pseudomembranous colitis, and it can occur in any severe colonic inflammatory process (125).
Figure 8.50. Ulcerative colitis. CT shows thickened rectal wall (arrow). There also is increased perirectal fat.
Neutropenic colitis, also known as typhlitis, occurs in severely neutropenic patients with aplastic anemia, leukemia, bone marrow transplantation, HIV infection, or other immunosuppressive conditions. CT is the study of choice for diagnosis because of the risk of perforation with contrast enema and endoscopy. CT findings include marked circumferential, low density thickening of the cecum and ascending colon (Fig. 8.52), and pericolonic fluid and soft tissue stranding. Pneumatosis also may be noted (118).
Infectious Colitis
CT findings of infectious colitis are nonspecific and include wall thickening, pericolonic soft tissue stranding, and ascites (Fig. 8.53). All or parts of the colon may be affected. Diffuse colonic involvement is common with E. coli and Cytomegalovirus infections. Predominantly right-sided involvement is more common with colitis caused by Salmonella, Campylobacter, Yersinia, tuberculosis, and amebiasis, whereas left-sided involvement predominates in colitis caused by Shigella or herpes (118).
Figure 8.51. Pseudomembranous colitis. There is severe low-attenuation, mural thickening of the right and transverse colon. Intraluminal contrast agent is insinuating between thickened edematous folds in the transverse colon, producing the accordion sign (arrows). The left colon is fluid filled and shows mild wall thickening.
Figure 8.52. Neutropenic colitis in a 7-year-old girl receiving chemotherapy for leukemia. There is concentric low-attenuation wall thickening in the cecum and ascending colon (arrows). B, bladder.
P.277

Figure 8.53. E. coli colitis in a 14-year-old boy with abdominal pain and diarrhea. There is marked thickening of the hepatic flexure and transverse and descending colon (arrows) with the accordion sign. Also note a small amount of ascites (a).
Noninflammatory Colonic Disorders
Cystic fibrosis is an inherited disease characterized by a generalized dysfunction of the exocrine glands. Gastrointestinal complications occur in 85% to 90% of patients, and the most common of these are meconium ileus, fibrosing colonopathy, and meconium ileus equivalent syndrome. The first two complications occur predominantly in neonates and young children who present with abdominal distention and small bowel obstruction. Meconium ileus equivalent syndrome has a predilection for adolescents and young adults who usually present with acute or chronic abdominal pain, constipation, and a palpable right lower quadrant mass. In most cases, plain abdominal radiographs and barium enema examinations suffice for diagnosis. In some cases, the clinical findings may mimic those of an acute abdomen and CT may be the initial imaging study of choice (126,127). CT findings include colonic wall thickening (mean thickness, 6.4 mm), the accordion sign, pericolonic soft tissue stranding, increased pericolonic fat, and mesenteric lymphadenopathy (Fig. 8.54). The disease involves the cecum and ascending colon in continuity, with variable distal extension. Sinus tracts, fistulae, abscesses, and extensive small bowel involvement are not typical of meconium ileus equivalent syndrome and help to differentiate it from Crohn disease (126,127).
Figure 8.54. Cystic fibrosis. A: CT scan through the mid abdomen of a 14-year-old boy with chronic right lower abdominal pain shows mural thickening of the ascending and transverse colon (arrows). B: More caudal scan shows thickened cecum (C). Pericolonic fatty proliferation and small associated lymph nodes are also present. Colonoscopy showed nonspecific acute and chronic inflammation and no evidence of Crohn disease.
Hemolytic uremic syndrome is a disorder characterized by a prodrome of bloody diarrhea followed by acute renal failure, hemolytic anemia, and thrombocytopenia. The cause is thought to be an antigen–antibody reaction to bacterial toxins, E. coli serotype O 157:H7 being one of the most frequent pathogens. This serotype produces a verotoxin, resulting in a vasculitis which in turn causes deposition of fibrin thrombi in the microvasculature of the kidneys and other organs. Shigella, Salmonella, Campylobacter, Yersinia, and enteroviruses also have been implicated as causes of the hemolytic uremic syndrome. CT findings include colonic wall
P.278

thickening, which may be homogeneous or show a layered appearance; pericolonic soft tissue stranding; and ascites (Fig. 8.55) (128). The edematous kidneys may have a lower attenuation value than normal on unenhanced CT scans.
Figure 8.55. Hemolytic uremic syndrome. There is thickening of the wall of the ascending colon (arrow). Also note a small amount of pericolonic ascites (A).
Figure 8.56. Pneumatosis intestinalis in a 7-year-old boy on steroid therapy. Axial CT (A) at soft tissue windows and coronal CT (B) at lung settings shows innumerable gas collections in the dependent and nondependent walls of the colon. Wall thickening and pericolonic inflammatory changes are absent, typical of benign pneumatosis. The white arrows in part A and the black arrows in part B indicate pneumatosis.
Colonic edema can occur in the setting of cirrhosis and portal hypertension. It usually affects the ascending colon (129).
Miscellaneous Disorders
Perirectal abscesses usually are associated with Crohn disease (Fig. 8.49). Other causes include perforation owing to foreign body or trauma and leakage at a site of surgical anastomosis.
Pneumatosis intestinalis refers to the presence of gas in the wall of the colon and/or small bowel. It is most often associated with bowel necrosis, usually owing to necrotizing colitis of infancy, but it also may be seen in more benign conditions. Benign causes include (a) increased mucosal permeability, related to steroid therapy, immunosuppression, chemotherapy, or graft versus host disease; (b) mucosal disruption related to Crohn disease, ulcerative colitis, or endoscopy; and (c) pulmonary diseases, such as asthma, cystic fibrosis, or mechanical ventilation. On CT, pneumatosis may have a cystic appearance, appearing as well-defined round air collections in the subserosal area of the bowel, or a linear appearance manifesting as streaks of gas within and parallel to the bowel wall (Fig. 8.56). Cyst rupture may result in a benign pneumoperitoneum.
P.279

References
1. Canon CL. Gastrointestinal Tract. In: Lee JKT, Sagel SS, Stanley RJ, et al., eds. Computed Body Tomography with MRI Correlation. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006:771–828.
2. Callahan MJ, Taylor GA. CT of the pediatric esophagus. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:1391–1396.
3. Macpherson RI. Gastrointestinal tract duplications: clinical, pathologic, etiologic, and radiologic considerations. Radiographics 1993;13:1063–1080.
4. Dahms BB. The gastrointestinal tract. In: Stocker JT, Dehner LP, eds. Pediatric Pathology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 2001; 631–703.
5. Soye JA, Yarr J, Dick AC, et al. Multidetector-row computed tomography three-dimensional volume reformatted “transparency” images to define an upper pouch fistula in oesophageal atresia. Pediatr Radiol 2005;35:624–626.
6. Rabushka LS, Fishman EK, Kuhlmann JE, et al. diffuse esophageal leiomyomatosis in a patient with Alport syndrome: CT demonstration. Radiology 1991;179:176–178.
7. Berkovich GY, Levine MS, Miller WT. CT findings in patients with esophagitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:1431–1434.
8. Braverman I, Gomori JM, Polv O, et al. The role of CT imaging in the evaluation of cervical esophageal foreign bodies. J Otolaryngol 1993;22:311–314.
9. Fishman EK, Urban BA, Hruban RH. CT of the stomach: spectrum of disease. Radiographics 1996;16:10035–1054.
10. Horton KM, Fishman EK. Current role of CT in imaging of the stomach. Radiographics 2003;23:75–87.
11. Gossios KJ, Tsianos EV, Demou LL, et al. Use of water or air as oral contrast media for computed tomographic study of the gastric wall: comparison of the two techniques. Gastrointest Radiol 1991;16:293–297.
12. Desai RK, Tagliabue JR, Wegryn SA, et al. CT evaluation of wall thickening in the alimentary tract. Radiographics 1991;11:771–783.
13. Faerber EN, Balsara R, Vinocur CD, et al. Gastric duplication with hemoptysis: CT findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993;161:1245–1246.
14. Ueda D, Taketazu M, Itoh S, et al. A case of gastric duplication cyst with aberrant pancreas. Pediatr Radiol 1991;21:379–380.
15. Cho J-S, Shin K-S, Kwon S-T, et al. Heterotopic pancreas in the stomach: CT findings. Radiology 2000:127:139–144.
16. Levy AD, Remotti HE, Thompson WM, et al. Gastrointes-tinal stromal tumors: radiologic features with pathologic correlation. Radiographics 2003;23:283–304.
17. Chung EM, Levy AD, Miettinen M, Siegel MJ. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the pediatric population: imaging features with clincopathologic correlation. RSNA 2007.
18. Egloff A, Lee EY, Dillon JE. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) of stomach in a pediatric patient. Pediatr Radiol 2005;35:728–729.
19. Ripolles T, Garcia-Aguayo J, Martinez M-J, et al. Gastrointestinal bezoars: sonographic and CT characteristics. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;177:65–69.
20. Kenney PJ, Brinsko RE, Patel DV. Gastric involvement in chronic granulomatous disease of childhood: demonstration by computed tomography and upper gastrointestinal studies. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1985;9:563–565.
21. Abbara S, Kalan MM, Lewicki AM. Intrathoracic stomach revisited. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:403–414.
22. Tu RK, Starshak RH, Brown B. CT diagnosis of gastric rupture following blunt abdominal trauma in a child. Pediatr Radiol 1992;22:146.
23. Hong SS, Kim AY, Byun JH, et al. MDCT of small-bowel disease: value of 3D imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:1212–1221.
24. Horton KM, Fishman EK. The current status of multidetector row CT and three-dimensional imaging of the small bowel. Radiol Clin N Am 2003;41:199–212.
25. Balthazar EJ. CT of the gastrointestinal tract: principles and interpretation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991;156:23–32.
26. Aidlen J, Anupindi SA, Jaramillo D, et al. Malrotation with midgut volvulus: CT findings of bowel infarction. Pediatr Radiol 2005;35:529–531.
27. Strouse PJ. Disorders of intestinal rotation and fixation (“malrotation”). Pediatr Radiol 2004;34:837–851.
28. Zerin JM, DiPietro MA. Mesenteric vascular anatomy at CT: normal and abnormal appearances. Radiology 1991;179:739–742.
29. Clark P, Ruess L. Counterclockwise barber-pole sign on CT: SMA/SMV variance without midgut malrotation. Pediatr Radiol 2005;35:1125–1127.
30. Henesch SM, Nance ML, Jaramillo D. Enhanced CT perfusion cut-off sign in midgut volvulus. Pediatr Radiol 2006;36:355–357.
31. Hughes JA, Cook JV, Said A, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumour of the duodenum in a 7-year-old boy. Pediatr Radiol 2004;34:1024–1027.
32. Levy AD, Abbott RM, Rohrmann CA, et al. Gastrointestinal hemangiomas: imaging findings with pathologic correlation in pediatric and adult patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;177:1073–1081.
33. Scafidi DE, McLeary MS, Young LW. Diffuse neonatal gastrointestinal hemangiomatosis: CT findings. Pediatr Radiol 1998;28:512–514.
34. Siegel MJ, Evans SJ, Balfe DM. Small bowel disease in children: diagnosis with CT. Radiology 1988;169:127–130.
35. Pickhardt P, Siegel MJ. Abdominal manifestations of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;171:1007–1013.
36. Pickhardt PJ, Siegel MJ. Posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder of the abdomen: CT evaluation in 51 patients. Radiology 1999;213:73–78.
37. Gore M, Balthazar EJ, Ghahremani GG, et al. CT features of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;167:3–15.
38. Jabra A, Fishman E, Taylor G. Crohn disease in the pediatric patient: CT evaluation. Radiology 1991;179:495–498.
39. Jabra AA, Fishman EK, Taylor GA. CT findings in inflammatory bowel disease in children. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;162:975–979.
40. Jamieson DH, Shipman PJ, Israel DM, et al. Comparison of multidetector CT and barium studies of the small bowel: inflammatory bowel disease in children. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:1211–1216.
41. Raptopoulos V, Schwartz RK, McNicholas MMJ, et al. Multiplanar helical CT enterography in patients with Crohn's disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;169:1545–1550.
42. Riddlesberger MM. CT of complicated inflammatory bowel disease in children. Pediatr Radiol 1985;15:384–387.
43. Meyers MA, McGuire PV. Spiral CT demonstration of hypervascularity in Crohn disease: “vascular jejunization of the ileum” or the “comb sign.” Abdom Imaging 1995;20: 327–332.
44. Doerfler O, Ruppert-Kohlymayr A, Reittner P, et al. Helical CT of the small bowel with alternative oral contrast material in patients with Crohn disease. Abdom Imaging 2003;28:313–318.
45. Mazzeo S, Caramella D, Battolla L, et al. Crohn disease of the small bowel: spiral CT evaluation after oral hyperhydration with isotonic solution. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2001;25:612–616.
46. Abcarian PW, Demas BE. Systemic Yersinia enterocolitica infection associated with iron overload and deferoxamine therapy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991;157:773–775.
47. Donnelly LF. CT findings of immunocompromised children with acute abdominal symptoms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;167:909–913.
48. Jeffrey RB, Nyberg DA, Bottles K, et al. Abdominal CT in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1986;146:7–13.
49. Sivit CJ, Taylor GA, Bulas DI, et al. Posttraumatic shock in children: CT findings associated with hemodynamic instability. Radiology 1992;182:723–236.
50. Strouse PJ, Close BJ, Marshall KW, et al. CT of bowel and mesenteric trauma in children. Radiographics 1999;19:1237–1250.
P.280

51. Fakhri A, Fishman EK, Jones B, et al. Primary intestinal lymphangiectasia: clinical and CT findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1985;9:767–770.
52. Puri AS, Aggarwal R, Gupta RK, et al. Intestinal lymphangiectasia: evaluation by CT and scintigraphy. Gastrointest Radiol 1992;17:119–121.
53. Balthazar EJ, Hulnick D, Megibow AJ, et al. Computed tomography of intramural intestinal hemorrhage and bowel ischemia. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1987;11:76–72.
54. Chou CK. CT manifestations of bowel ischemia. Radiographics 2002;178:87–91.
55. Smerud M, Johnson C, Stephens D. Diagnosis of bowel infarction: a comparison of plain films and CT scans in 23 cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990;154:99–103.
56. Wiesener W, Khurana B, Ji J, et al. CT of acute bowel ischemia. Radiology 2003;226:635–650.
57. Benya EC, Sivit CJ, Quinones RR. Abdominal complications after bone marrow transplantation in children: sonographic and CT findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993;161:1023–1027.
58. Day DL, Carpenter BLM. Abdominal complications in pediatric bone marrow transplant recipients. Radiographics 1993;13:1101–1112.
59. Donnelly LF, Morris CL. Acute graft-versus-host disease in children: abdominal CT findings. Radiology 1996;199:265–268.
60. Siskind BN, Burrell MI, Pun H, et al. CT demonstration of gastrointestinal involvement in Henoch-Schönlein syndrome. Gastrointest Radiol 1985;10:352–354.
61. Balthazar EJ. CT of small-bowel obstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;162:255–261.
62. Boudiaf M, Soyer P, Terem C, et al. CT evaluation of small bowel obstruction. Radiographics 2001;21:613–624.
63. Caoili EM, Paulson EK. CT of small bowel obstruction: another perspective using multiplanar reformations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:993–998.
64. Frager D, Medwid SW, Baer JW, et al. CT of small-bowel obstruction: value in establishing the diagnosis and determining the degree and cause. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;162:37–41.
65. Furukawa A, Yamasaki M, Furuichi K, et al. Helical CT in the diagnosis of small bowel obstruction. Radiographics 2001;21:341–355.
66. Gazelle GS, Goldberg MA, Wittenberg J, et al. Efficacy of CT in distinguishing small-bowel obstruction from other causes of small bowel dilatation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;162:43–47.
67. Jabra AA, Eng J, Zaleski CG, et al. CT of small-bowel obstruction in children: sensitivity and specificity. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;177:431–436.
68. Maglinte DDT, Gage SN, Harmon BH, et al. Obstruction of the small intestine: accuracy and role of CT in diagnosis. Radiology 1993;188:61–66.
69. Nicolaou S, Kai B, Ho S, et al. Imaging of acute small-bowel obstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;185:1036–1044.
70. Taourel PG, Fabre J-M, Pradel JA, et al. Value of CT in the diagnosis and management of patients with suspected acute small-bowel obstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995;165:1187–1192.
71. Ha HK, Park CH, Kim SK, et al. CT analysis of intestinal obstruction due to adhesions: early detection of strangulation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1993;17:386–389.
72. Balthazar EJ, Birnbaum BA, Megibow AJ, et al. Closed-loop and strangulating intestinal obstruction: CT signs. Radiology 1992;185:769–775.
73. Miller PA, Mezwa DG, Feczko PJ, et al. Imaging of abdominal hernias. Radiographics 1995;15:333–347.
74. Zarvan NP, Lee FT, Yandow DR. Abdominal hernias: CT findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995;164:1391–1395.
75. Day DL, Drake DG, Leonard AS, et al. CT findings in left paraduodenal hernia. Gastrointest Radiol 1988;13:27–29.
76. Warshauer DM, Mauro MA. CT diagnosis of paraduodenal hernia. Gastrointest Radiol 1992;17:13–15.
77. Cox TD, Winters WD, Weinberger E. CT of intussusception in the pediatric patient: diagnosis and pitfalls. Pediatr Radiol 1996;26:26–32.
78. Strouse PJ, DiPietero MA, Saez F. Transient small-bowel intussusception in children on CT. Pediatr Radiol 2003;33:316–320.
79. Santer R, Young C, Rossi T, et al. Computed tomography in superior mesenteric artery syndrome. Pediatr Radiol 1991;21:154–155.
80. Birnbaum BA, Wilson SR. Appendicitis at the millennium. Radiology 2000;215:337–348.
81. Callahan MJ, Rodrijuez DP, Taylor GA. How I do it: CT of appendicitis in children. Radiology 2002;224:325–332.
82. Fefferman NR, Roche KJ, Pinkey LP, et al. Suspected appendicitis in children: focused CT technique for evaluation. Radiology 2001;220:691–695.
83. Kaiser S, Finnbogason T, Jorulf H, et al. Suspected appendicitis in children: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced versus nonenhanced helical CT. Radiology 2004;231:427–433.
84. Lowe LH, Penney MW, Stein SM, et al. Unenhanced limited CT of the abdomen in the diagnosis of appendicitis in children: comparison with sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:31–35.
85. Mullins ME, Kircher MF, Ryan DP, et al. Evaluation of suspected appendicitis in children using limited helical CT and colonic contrast material. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:37–41.
86. Malone AJ, Wolf CR, Malmed AS, et al. Diagnosis of acute appendicitis: value of unenhanced CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993;160:763–766.
87. Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, et al. Helical CT technique for the diagnosis of appendicitis: prospective evaluation of a focused appendix CT examination. Radiology 1997;202:139–144.
88. Sivit CJ. Imaging the child with right lower quadrant pain and suspected appendicitis: current concepts. Pediatr Radiol 2004;34:447–453.
89. Sivit CJ, Dudgeon DL, Applegate KE, et al. Evaluation of suspected appendicitis in children and young adults: helical CT. Radiology 2000;216:430–433.
90. Sivit CJ, Siegel MJ, Applegate KE, et al. When appendicitis is suspected in children. Radiographics 2001;21:247–262.
91. Acousta R, Crain EF, Goldman HS. CT can reduce hospitalization for observation in children with suspected appendicitis. Pediatr Radiol 2005;35:495–500.
92. Applegate KE, Sivit CJ, Salvator AE, et al. Effect of cross-sectional imaging in negative appendectomy and perforation rates in children. Radiology 2001;220:103–107.
93. Doria AS, Moineddin R, Kellenberger CJ, et al. US or CT for diagnosis of appendicitis in children and adults? A meta-analysis. Radiology 2006;241:83–94.
94. Garcia Pena BM, Taylor GA, Lund KP, et al. Effect of computed tomography on patient management and costs in children with suspected appendicitis. Pediatrics 1999;104: 440–446.
95. Rodriguez DP, Vargas S, Callahan MJ, et al. Appendicitis in young children: imaging experience and clinical outcomes. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186:1158–1164.
96. Friedland J, Siegel MJ. CT appearance of acute appendicitis in childhood. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;168:439–442.
97. Taylor GA, Callahan MJ, Rodriguez D, et al. CT for suspected appendicitis in children: an analysis of diagnostic errors. Pediatr Radiol 2006;36:331–337.
98. Applegate KE, Sivit CJ, Myers MT, et al. Using helical CT to diagnose acute appendicitis in children: spectrum of findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:501–505.
99. Balthazar EJ, Birnbaum BA, Yee J, et al. Acute appendicitis: CT and US correlation in 100 patients. Radiology 1994;190:31–35.
100. Jabra AA, Shalaby-Rana EI, Fishman EK. CT of appendicitis in children. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1997;21:661–666.
101. Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA. Distal appendicitis: CT appearance and diagnosis. Radiology 1997;204:709–712.
102. Rao PM, Wittenberg J, McDowell RK, et al. Appendicitis: use of arrowhead sign for diagnosis at CT. Radiology 1997;202:363–366.
P.281

103. Lowe LH, Penney MW, Scheker LE, et al. Appendicolith revealed on CT in children with suspected appendicitis: how specific is it in the diagnosis of appendicitis? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:981–984.
104. Bixby SD, Lucey BC, Soto JA, et al. Perforated versus nonperforated acute appendicitis: accuracy of multidetector CT detection. Radiology 2006;241:780–786.
105. Horrow MM, White DS, Horrow JC. Differentiation of perforated from nonperforated appendicitis at CT. Radiology 2003;227:46–51.
106. Jamieson DH, Chait PG, Filler R. Interventional drainage of appendiceal abscesses in children. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;169:1619–1622.
107. Yu JS, Bennett WF, Bova JG. CT of superior mesenteric vein thrombosis complicating periappendiceal abscess. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1993;17:309–312.
108. Levy AD, Hobbs CM. Meckel diverticulum: radiologic features with pathologic correlation. Radiographics 2004;24:565–587.
109. Macari M, Hines J, Balthazar E, et al. Mesenteric adenitis: CT diagnosis of primary versus secondary causes, incidence, and clinical significance in pediatric and adult patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;178:853–858.
110. Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA. CT diagnosis of mesenteric adenitis. Radiology 1997;202:145–149.
111. Anupindi S, Perumpillichira J, Israel EJ, et al. Low-dose CT colonography in children: initial experience, technical feasibility, and utility. Pediatr Radiol 2005;35:518–524.
112. Kohda E, Fujioka M, Ikawa H, et al. Congenital anorectal anomaly: CT evaluation. Radiology 1985;157:349–353.
113. Earls JP, Colon-Negron E, Dachman AH. Colorectal carcinoma in young patients: CT detection of an atypical pattern of recurrence. Abdom Imaging 1994;19:441–445.
114. Sasi OA, Sathiapalan R, Rifai A, et al. Colonic neuroendocrine carcinoma in a child. Pediatr Radiol 2005;35:339–343.
115. Rich JD, Crawford JM, Kazanjian SN, et al. Discrete gastrointestinal mass lesions caused by cytomegalovirus in patients with AIDS: report of three cases and review. Clin Infect Dis 1992;15:609–614.
116. Horton KM, Corl FM, Fishman EK. CT evaluation of the colon: inflammatory disease. Radiographics 2000;20: 399–418.
117. Philpotts LE, Heiken JP, Westcott MA, et al. Colitis: use of CT findings in differential diagnosis. Radiology 1994;190:445–449.
118. Thoeni RF, Cello JP. CT imaging of colitis. Radiology 2006;240:623–637.
119. Choi D, Jin Lee S, Ah Cho Y, et al. Bowel wall thickening in patients with Crohn's disease: CT patterns and correlation with inflammatory activity. Clin Radiol 2003;58:68–74.
120. Blickman G, Boland GWL, Cleveland RH, et al. Pseudo-membranous colitis: CT findings in children. Pediatr Radiol 1995;25:S157–S159.
121. Boland GW, Lee MJ, Cats AM, et al. Antibiotic-induced diarrhea: specificity of abdominal CT for the diagnosis of clostridium difficile disease. Radiology 1994;191:103–106.
122. Fishman EK, Kavuru M, Jones B, et al. Pseudomembranous colitis: CT evaluation of 26 cases. Radiology 1991;180:57–60.
123. Kawamoto S, Horton KM, Fishman EK. Pseudomembranous colitis: spectrum of imaging findings with clinical and pathologic correlation. Radiographics 1999;19:887–897.
124. Ros PR, Buetow PC, Pantograg-Brown L, et al. Pseudo-membranous colitis. Radiology 1996;198:1–9.
125. Macari M, Balthazar EJ, Megibow AJ. The accordion sign at CT: a nonspecific finding in patients with colonic edema. Radiology 1999;211:743–746.
126. Fields TM, Michel SJ, Butler CL, et al. Abdominal manifestations of cystic fibrosis in older children and adults. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:1199–1203.
127. Pickhardt P, Yagan N, Siegel MJ, et al. CT of colonic disease in cystic fibrosis. Radiology 1998;206:727–730.
128. Tanaka O, Matsuura K, Nigai J, et al. Hemorrhagic colitis caused by Escherichia coli preceding hemolytic-uremic syndrome: radiologic features. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992;158:551–552.
129. Guingrich JA, Kuhlman JE. Colonic wall thickening in patients with cirrhosis: CT findings and clinical implications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;172:919–924.
Berliner Datenrettung in Deutschland